Write a research paper on the Bill Clinton political sex scandal that occurred with Monica Lewinsky.
In writing your essay, consider the following questions, and organize your essay to address each:
- Use your introduction to give a brief description of the scandal. Who were the people involved, and what happened?
- Who was the person in office with the political power? Was is a man or a woman? What was the politicianâs class, and how can you tell?
- What ended up happening to the non-famous person? Were you able to find out anything about him/her after the scandal died down? What was it?
- What ended up happening to the politician? Is/was he still in office after this scandal occurred?
Conclude your essay with a discussion of what you noticed about what the scandal revealed about gender and power. Do you think the outcome would have been different if the genders of the people involved was reversed? Why or why not? In what way?
Sample Solution
re partial privatization, combined with investments in infrastructure, military, and education, M.B.S is hopeful that this will create an impenetrable division between Saudi Arabia and total oil dependence/Dutch Disease. One of the most intriguing aspects of Vision 2030 is the blue print for NEOM, a mega-city run on clean renewable energy that will connect Saudi Arabia to Jordan and Egypt (Ellyat). NEOM is intended to be funded through foreign direct investment (which they are aiming to increase through these kinds of attractions) as well as the partial privatization of Saudi Aramco. NEOM aims to be a new and modern technological hub that will embrace the digital era in order to become a major middle-eastern commercial location (Ellyat). The building of NEOM will produce a large amount of jobs for the citizens and create a sustainable environment in which, perhaps, new and old businesses can thrive. However, the question is will the people of Saudi Arabia take advantage of these new job opportunities as well as the growth of their nation? The past says more than likely not. The government revenue and expenditures of Saudi Arabia rely heavily on oil generated royalties. This is primarily due to the lack of implementation of personal income tax on the citizens of this country. And so, the social contract between the people and government is dominated and dictated by the rentierâ effect; this rentier social contract has a direct negative impact on the power of the people, however, they have silently agreed to its repercussions. With the oil royalties funding the fiscal system, the people of the country acquiesce their government representation for their emancipation from taxation, gift of free education, as well as free health care. As the people and the petro-state rely on economic stability fueled by a steadily depleting resource they remove themselves from any glimpse of change and growth. They b>
re partial privatization, combined with investments in infrastructure, military, and education, M.B.S is hopeful that this will create an impenetrable division between Saudi Arabia and total oil dependence/Dutch Disease. One of the most intriguing aspects of Vision 2030 is the blue print for NEOM, a mega-city run on clean renewable energy that will connect Saudi Arabia to Jordan and Egypt (Ellyat). NEOM is intended to be funded through foreign direct investment (which they are aiming to increase through these kinds of attractions) as well as the partial privatization of Saudi Aramco. NEOM aims to be a new and modern technological hub that will embrace the digital era in order to become a major middle-eastern commercial location (Ellyat). The building of NEOM will produce a large amount of jobs for the citizens and create a sustainable environment in which, perhaps, new and old businesses can thrive. However, the question is will the people of Saudi Arabia take advantage of these new job opportunities as well as the growth of their nation? The past says more than likely not. The government revenue and expenditures of Saudi Arabia rely heavily on oil generated royalties. This is primarily due to the lack of implementation of personal income tax on the citizens of this country. And so, the social contract between the people and government is dominated and dictated by the rentierâ effect; this rentier social contract has a direct negative impact on the power of the people, however, they have silently agreed to its repercussions. With the oil royalties funding the fiscal system, the people of the country acquiesce their government representation for their emancipation from taxation, gift of free education, as well as free health care. As the people and the petro-state rely on economic stability fueled by a steadily depleting resource they remove themselves from any glimpse of change and growth. They b>
