As a chief operating officer of a hospital, you have been tasked with opening a new ambulatory care center in your city.
Write a 2-3 page paper in which you:
Specify whether you would utilize the professional autonomy, social contract, or free market perspective as the paradigm to design the structure of your new center. Debate at least two (2) advantages and two (2) disadvantages of your chosen perspective. Provide at least two (2) examples of your perspective in action to support your response.
Analyze the key components of three (3) sources of law related to the effects that each source could potentially have on your healthcare organizationâs new initiative.
Use at least two (2) quality references. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.
Sample Solution
The paper “Brain science: Culture And The Self” is a great case of a clarified list of sources on brain research. Chua, Hannah Faye., Leu, Janxin., and Nisbett, Richard E. “Culture and Diverging Views of Social Events.” Society for Personality and Social Psychology. The article by Chua, Leu, and Nisbett makes a significant correlation of the East Asians’ and Americans’ perspectives on regular get-togethers so as to discover the impact of culture on the separating perspectives on get-togethers. One of the significant discoveries of the exploration led is that the Americans will in general spotlight more on oneself and to have a more prominent feeling of individual office than East Asians. The examination likewise dissected how these two gatherings varied in their comprehension of get-togethers. At last, the investigation makes a huge commitment to the comprehension of “the social contrasts in impression of physical upgrades, fake social improvements, and memory of occasions concerning oneself.” Hong, Ying-yi., Ip, Grace., Chiu, Chi-yue., Morris, Michael W., and Menon, Tanya. “Self Cultural Identity and Dynamic Construction of the Self: Collective Duties and Individual Rights in Chinese and American Cultures.” In their investigation announced in this article, the writers analyze the impacts of social character enactment on Chinese and North Americans’ unconstrained self-ideas, utilizing the dynamic constructivist way to deal with culture and perception. They explicitly control the striking nature of individual self (“I”), aggregate self (“we”), and social character so as to make their decisions. Altogether, they presume that “lay hypotheses of social association in a culture ought to be viewed as inactive information structures, which can be actuated by signs in the earth. At the point when social personality is initiated, people originating from societies with notably various originations of social association would shape distinctive unconstrained originations of oneself.” Singelis, Theodore M. what’s more, Brown, William. “Culture, Self, and Collectivist Communication; Linking Culture to Individual Behavior.” This article by Singelis and Brown offers a hypothetical structure and comparing philosophy to interface the significant factors at the way of life level to the individual level and, eventually, to the particular result factors. The creators keep up that if there ought to be the headway in principle about culture’s effect on correspondence, it is essential to inspect how culture influences singular level procedures and how these procedures influence correspondence. Along these lines, the different talks and the discoveries of this examination have incredible ramifications with respect to the comprehension of culture’s impact on correspondence and the connection among culture and self.>
The paper “Brain science: Culture And The Self” is a great case of a clarified list of sources on brain research. Chua, Hannah Faye., Leu, Janxin., and Nisbett, Richard E. “Culture and Diverging Views of Social Events.” Society for Personality and Social Psychology. The article by Chua, Leu, and Nisbett makes a significant correlation of the East Asians’ and Americans’ perspectives on regular get-togethers so as to discover the impact of culture on the separating perspectives on get-togethers. One of the significant discoveries of the exploration led is that the Americans will in general spotlight more on oneself and to have a more prominent feeling of individual office than East Asians. The examination likewise dissected how these two gatherings varied in their comprehension of get-togethers. At last, the investigation makes a huge commitment to the comprehension of “the social contrasts in impression of physical upgrades, fake social improvements, and memory of occasions concerning oneself.” Hong, Ying-yi., Ip, Grace., Chiu, Chi-yue., Morris, Michael W., and Menon, Tanya. “Self Cultural Identity and Dynamic Construction of the Self: Collective Duties and Individual Rights in Chinese and American Cultures.” In their investigation announced in this article, the writers analyze the impacts of social character enactment on Chinese and North Americans’ unconstrained self-ideas, utilizing the dynamic constructivist way to deal with culture and perception. They explicitly control the striking nature of individual self (“I”), aggregate self (“we”), and social character so as to make their decisions. Altogether, they presume that “lay hypotheses of social association in a culture ought to be viewed as inactive information structures, which can be actuated by signs in the earth. At the point when social personality is initiated, people originating from societies with notably various originations of social association would shape distinctive unconstrained originations of oneself.” Singelis, Theodore M. what’s more, Brown, William. “Culture, Self, and Collectivist Communication; Linking Culture to Individual Behavior.” This article by Singelis and Brown offers a hypothetical structure and comparing philosophy to interface the significant factors at the way of life level to the individual level and, eventually, to the particular result factors. The creators keep up that if there ought to be the headway in principle about culture’s effect on correspondence, it is essential to inspect how culture influences singular level procedures and how these procedures influence correspondence. Along these lines, the different talks and the discoveries of this examination have incredible ramifications with respect to the comprehension of culture’s impact on correspondence and the connection among culture and self.>
