Decision analysis and rational decision making model are presented as tools to improve health care provider decisions. Clinical Decision Analysis (CDA) is always cautioned to be used as as “a reference in decision making” or “detailed care is required when interpreting the results of CDA studies and applying them to clinical practice”. I argue that health care providers has no interest to use decision analysis or rational decision making support. They are complicated, they take time to develop and as evidence changes with high speed, they get out-dated quickly. Therefore the money spent for clinical decision analysis or rational decision making support tools are wasted.
Do you agree with my position? if yes, why? If no, how can we use these in medical decision making, How can we integrate them into medical decisions? What can we do to make them cost effective?
Sample Solution
mark, luke and john have been now not usually on the same area on the equal time and did not all began out as disciples at the same time. did they have the equal access to jesus at all times? i it viable that they misinterpreted or just didnât pay attention each phrase he said? what if they had ulterior motives and simply refused to relay the messages he gave them for his human beings. judas had ulterior reasons, so we canât say they have been all honesty and authentic servants. peter denied him, hence we will easily say, their dedication changed into no longer iron clad, so what if ,for his or her personal achievement and ego, they relay what they wanted to leaving out precious stuff. there are a variety of speculations as to who said and did what, thus leaving the concept of the infallibility of the bible hanging. mark 7: 36 outlines that âjesus attempted to preserve a few miracle memories hush hush, telling the recipients to suppress identical. (jesus commanded them no longer to inform everyone. however the extra he did so, the more they stored talking).[7] mark nine:nine outlines as followed âas they have been coming down the mountain, jesus admonished them not to tell every person what they had visible till the son of man had risen from the uselessâ.[8] there are numerous who may also argue that god made us perfect in his sight and known as us his masterpiece, yes god is capable of doing that and greater. however the bible was written with the aid of guy and thus cannot be seen as infallible. the thought that the bible is infallible is just a fallacy, an unqualified and hasty generalization. in line with sire, w james, (why appropriate arguments fail),âthe bible is complete of contradictions, we are able toât trust it to inform the truth.â [9] letâs study some of the contradictions in the bible the tale of the final supper as recorded in matthew, mark and luke nearly mirrors each different as mentioned here, âon the first day of the pageant of unleavened bread, when it become standard to sacrifice the passover lamb, jesusâ disciples requested him, âwherein do you want us to move and make preparations as a way to devour the passover?â this could be seen in matthew, mark and luke although with distinct wording and timeframes as to what came about subsequent. in an editorial copied from www.gotquestions.org, the subsequent turned into cited: âthe bible does now not explicitly nation on which day of the week jesus turned into crucified. the two maximum broadly held views are friday and wednesday. a few, but, the usage of a synthesis of each the friday and wednesday arguments, argue for thursday as the dayâ. [10] matthew claimed that jesus turned into arrested and crucified that same day (wednesday) mark claimed that he was arrested and crucified the next day. (thursday) luke claims that he changed into arrested and crucified on (friday) the closing supper and crucifixion of jesus as outlined by matthew, mark and luke can be read inside the underneath mentioned chapters of their writings. while one reads those three books of the bible clean variations may be visible of their interpretation of the sequence of occasions as it relates to âthe remaining supper and crucifixion of jesusâ. does that no longer say that the bible is not that infallible e-book that is being advertised? are bookstores, philosophers, pastors and all others promoting a ebook that they are being hypocrites approximately? would they wager in this reality, or is it a fallacy inclusive of a âhasty generalization âto mention, for the reason that e-book became written by means of guys who’ve firsthand understanding or had been stimulated by god, there are no errors. it is simply feasible that one or greater of the biblical writers could have been under the influence of alcohol, fell asleep, turned into indignant or simply too lazy to edit nicely and dot every âiâ and move each âtâ. for if there is one instance of confusion that may be mentioned such as that visible in the story of the ultimate supper and crucifixion, then we will without problems assume that there are extra instances, a number of which i will outline under. allowâs study a few different contradictory memories within the bible. the story of cain and abel is one which screams âcontradictionâ: after murdering his brother, cain runs off and shacks up with some other female- genesis four:16-17[11] outlines that cain went>
mark, luke and john have been now not usually on the same area on the equal time and did not all began out as disciples at the same time. did they have the equal access to jesus at all times? i it viable that they misinterpreted or just didnât pay attention each phrase he said? what if they had ulterior motives and simply refused to relay the messages he gave them for his human beings. judas had ulterior reasons, so we canât say they have been all honesty and authentic servants. peter denied him, hence we will easily say, their dedication changed into no longer iron clad, so what if ,for his or her personal achievement and ego, they relay what they wanted to leaving out precious stuff. there are a variety of speculations as to who said and did what, thus leaving the concept of the infallibility of the bible hanging. mark 7: 36 outlines that âjesus attempted to preserve a few miracle memories hush hush, telling the recipients to suppress identical. (jesus commanded them no longer to inform everyone. however the extra he did so, the more they stored talking).[7] mark nine:nine outlines as followed âas they have been coming down the mountain, jesus admonished them not to tell every person what they had visible till the son of man had risen from the uselessâ.[8] there are numerous who may also argue that god made us perfect in his sight and known as us his masterpiece, yes god is capable of doing that and greater. however the bible was written with the aid of guy and thus cannot be seen as infallible. the thought that the bible is infallible is just a fallacy, an unqualified and hasty generalization. in line with sire, w james, (why appropriate arguments fail),âthe bible is complete of contradictions, we are able toât trust it to inform the truth.â [9] letâs study some of the contradictions in the bible the tale of the final supper as recorded in matthew, mark and luke nearly mirrors each different as mentioned here, âon the first day of the pageant of unleavened bread, when it become standard to sacrifice the passover lamb, jesusâ disciples requested him, âwherein do you want us to move and make preparations as a way to devour the passover?â this could be seen in matthew, mark and luke although with distinct wording and timeframes as to what came about subsequent. in an editorial copied from www.gotquestions.org, the subsequent turned into cited: âthe bible does now not explicitly nation on which day of the week jesus turned into crucified. the two maximum broadly held views are friday and wednesday. a few, but, the usage of a synthesis of each the friday and wednesday arguments, argue for thursday as the dayâ. [10] matthew claimed that jesus turned into arrested and crucified that same day (wednesday) mark claimed that he was arrested and crucified the next day. (thursday) luke claims that he changed into arrested and crucified on (friday) the closing supper and crucifixion of jesus as outlined by matthew, mark and luke can be read inside the underneath mentioned chapters of their writings. while one reads those three books of the bible clean variations may be visible of their interpretation of the sequence of occasions as it relates to âthe remaining supper and crucifixion of jesusâ. does that no longer say that the bible is not that infallible e-book that is being advertised? are bookstores, philosophers, pastors and all others promoting a ebook that they are being hypocrites approximately? would they wager in this reality, or is it a fallacy inclusive of a âhasty generalization âto mention, for the reason that e-book became written by means of guys who’ve firsthand understanding or had been stimulated by god, there are no errors. it is simply feasible that one or greater of the biblical writers could have been under the influence of alcohol, fell asleep, turned into indignant or simply too lazy to edit nicely and dot every âiâ and move each âtâ. for if there is one instance of confusion that may be mentioned such as that visible in the story of the ultimate supper and crucifixion, then we will without problems assume that there are extra instances, a number of which i will outline under. allowâs study a few different contradictory memories within the bible. the story of cain and abel is one which screams âcontradictionâ: after murdering his brother, cain runs off and shacks up with some other female- genesis four:16-17[11] outlines that cain went>
