Interview group of 5-10 males and 5-10 females about when they believe adulthood begins (must interview a minimum of 5 each male and female). List the most widely used criteria for determining when a person reaches adulthood. Describe the rituals and indicators of adulthood identified by the individuals. Generate a chart or table to show the most common indicators of adulthood between cultures as well as the different rituals or rites of passage.
Sample Solution
materialist and post-structuralism
perspectives. There is some display of a greater attachment to âpatriarchyâ and embrace the concept of hegemonic masculinity, which will be further critically examined in this chapter. Materialist perspectives are especially evident in the early histories of masculinity, which emerged as the claims of male liberationists started to be aired and the womenâs movement began its slow alteration of social life. In the 1970s, Natalie Davis famously urged womenâs historians to âbe interested in the history of both women and men,â claiming âthat we should not be working only on the subjected sex any more than an historian of class can focus exclusively on peasants.â Yet this invitation was largely ignored as âgenderâ continued to function as a synonymous word for women. In the late time of 1970s, Joseph Pleck was critiquing the sex role theory because of its inability to account for power . Beginning in the early 1980s, the Australian masculinist, R. W. Connell developed a way of theorizing diversity among masculinity that went beyond sex role theory while remaining firmly connected to the concept of patriarchy. Peter N. Stearns, a social historian, published a book called âBe a Man! Males in Modern Societyâ. Stearns worked with existing social histories to sketch changing masculine ideals in Europe and North America since the industrial revolution. Arguing that gender is â a valid, though not exclusive, means of social analysis,â Stearns traced the contemporary crisis of masculinity to long-term social structures associated with the broad process of change associated with industrialization and the rise of cities, and the development of modern society and a modernized outlook from the late eighteenth century to the present .â After describing the general challenges that industrialization posed to traditional forms of masculinity, Stearns outlined broad categories of men who, despite hailing from different national cultures, shared certain general characteristics. This formation of sociological ideal types provided an important starting point for more focused studies, which is precisely what Stearns had hoped to accomplish. . In the early 1990s, E. Anthony Rotundo argued that in the United States, traditional communal forms of manhood were overshadowed in the early nineteenth century by a new emphasis on the âself-made man,â a bourgeois model that was extended and confronted around 1900 by a more aggressive passionate manhood . Rotundoâs basic typology was extended in Michael Kimmelâs Manhood in America: A Cultural History. Kimmel, the sociologist, employs the notion of hegemonic masculinity for political as well as methodological reasons. Like John Tosh, who is known for similarly pioneering work on the history of British masculinities, Kimmel maintains that the concept allows sch>
materialist and post-structuralism perspectives. There is some display of a greater attachment to âpatriarchyâ and embrace the concept of hegemonic masculinity, which will be further critically examined in this chapter. Materialist perspectives are especially evident in the early histories of masculinity, which emerged as the claims of male liberationists started to be aired and the womenâs movement began its slow alteration of social life. In the 1970s, Natalie Davis famously urged womenâs historians to âbe interested in the history of both women and men,â claiming âthat we should not be working only on the subjected sex any more than an historian of class can focus exclusively on peasants.â Yet this invitation was largely ignored as âgenderâ continued to function as a synonymous word for women. In the late time of 1970s, Joseph Pleck was critiquing the sex role theory because of its inability to account for power . Beginning in the early 1980s, the Australian masculinist, R. W. Connell developed a way of theorizing diversity among masculinity that went beyond sex role theory while remaining firmly connected to the concept of patriarchy. Peter N. Stearns, a social historian, published a book called âBe a Man! Males in Modern Societyâ. Stearns worked with existing social histories to sketch changing masculine ideals in Europe and North America since the industrial revolution. Arguing that gender is â a valid, though not exclusive, means of social analysis,â Stearns traced the contemporary crisis of masculinity to long-term social structures associated with the broad process of change associated with industrialization and the rise of cities, and the development of modern society and a modernized outlook from the late eighteenth century to the present .â After describing the general challenges that industrialization posed to traditional forms of masculinity, Stearns outlined broad categories of men who, despite hailing from different national cultures, shared certain general characteristics. This formation of sociological ideal types provided an important starting point for more focused studies, which is precisely what Stearns had hoped to accomplish. . In the early 1990s, E. Anthony Rotundo argued that in the United States, traditional communal forms of manhood were overshadowed in the early nineteenth century by a new emphasis on the âself-made man,â a bourgeois model that was extended and confronted around 1900 by a more aggressive passionate manhood . Rotundoâs basic typology was extended in Michael Kimmelâs Manhood in America: A Cultural History. Kimmel, the sociologist, employs the notion of hegemonic masculinity for political as well as methodological reasons. Like John Tosh, who is known for similarly pioneering work on the history of British masculinities, Kimmel maintains that the concept allows sch>