“Many of you have found your placements for field hours are not functioning during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, some of you continue to have
the opportunity to complete your hours. For those without options, I have been given permission to offer alternatives to the field hours (due to the
current situation).
Should you have the need, you can watch the following 4 videos of a conversation between Salvador Minuchin and Jay Haley about Family therapy.
Afterwards, write a 4 – 6 page reaction paper based on the videos. Express your thoughts about Dr. Minuchin’s perspective. Include how it relates to
the content of our course. You may (might even WANT TO) include any disagreements or concerns you have with Dr. Minuchin’s perspective (e.g.,
how well thought out is his theory? are there biases/limitations to his theory based on culture as we’ve defined it?).
Sample Solution
ideas also the assortments behind both them. I will give a short review of the logical and philosophical ways to deal with the thought of choice. On the off chance that determinism is valid, at that point the idea of human ethical quality is simply a fantasy of decision. Subsequently, through and through freedom is the most reasonable on account of individuals on the grounds that as we know about our unrestrained choice or our capacity to pick and this makes us answerable for moral activities and every single other go about as people. Determinism is the idea that everything is controlled by past occasions. It is firmly related with the domino impact; as one domino falls the following will fall et cetera. This shut all inclusive view implies that there everything is foreordained and fated to happen ruling out anything new to appear. Each activity, thought or cognizant choice that we make as a human is the impact of our past activity. 90. From a more noteworthy perspective, all occasions that have occurred in history are impacts of earlier occasions. This persuades everything is concrete and unalterable in past, present or future. Determinism is an expansive and radical thought that influences gushing convictions, for example, profound quality, science and religion. Contemporary researchers have assumed the general issue of human opportunity by connecting determinism and hereditary qualities through hereditary determinism. This idea joins determinism straightforwardly to DNA and the quality articulation of a human. Quality determinism is upheld by the possibility that on account of incidents with specific qualities it can prompt physical and mental modifications which implies that we are truly dictated by our qualities. Notwithstanding, this is the place hereditary determinists need to develop this thought and reason that since we are genuinely dictated by qualities our conduct should likewise be controlled by qualities. This thought our conduct is controlled by our hereditary cosmetics appears to be excessively radical and leaves no room opportunity since we are hereditarily foreordained making us casualties to our hereditary cosmetics. Since science has the capacity to modify hereditary qualities then that implies they have the ability to change our physical conclusions just as our conduct judgments. This information on qualities implies we can change ourselves and eventually adjust our conduct which will modify our ethical quality. In spite of the fact that, on the off chance that assurance is valid, at that point human profound quality is just a deception since everything that happens would be viewed as a need. In the event that all events are set in time normally without aggravations, at that point there would be no space for unethical behavior since ethical quality would not exist.>
ideas also the assortments behind both them. I will give a short review of the logical and philosophical ways to deal with the thought of choice. On the off chance that determinism is valid, at that point the idea of human ethical quality is simply a fantasy of decision. Subsequently, through and through freedom is the most reasonable on account of individuals on the grounds that as we know about our unrestrained choice or our capacity to pick and this makes us answerable for moral activities and every single other go about as people. Determinism is the idea that everything is controlled by past occasions. It is firmly related with the domino impact; as one domino falls the following will fall et cetera. This shut all inclusive view implies that there everything is foreordained and fated to happen ruling out anything new to appear. Each activity, thought or cognizant choice that we make as a human is the impact of our past activity. 90. From a more noteworthy perspective, all occasions that have occurred in history are impacts of earlier occasions. This persuades everything is concrete and unalterable in past, present or future. Determinism is an expansive and radical thought that influences gushing convictions, for example, profound quality, science and religion. Contemporary researchers have assumed the general issue of human opportunity by connecting determinism and hereditary qualities through hereditary determinism. This idea joins determinism straightforwardly to DNA and the quality articulation of a human. Quality determinism is upheld by the possibility that on account of incidents with specific qualities it can prompt physical and mental modifications which implies that we are truly dictated by our qualities. Notwithstanding, this is the place hereditary determinists need to develop this thought and reason that since we are genuinely dictated by qualities our conduct should likewise be controlled by qualities. This thought our conduct is controlled by our hereditary cosmetics appears to be excessively radical and leaves no room opportunity since we are hereditarily foreordained making us casualties to our hereditary cosmetics. Since science has the capacity to modify hereditary qualities then that implies they have the ability to change our physical conclusions just as our conduct judgments. This information on qualities implies we can change ourselves and eventually adjust our conduct which will modify our ethical quality. In spite of the fact that, on the off chance that assurance is valid, at that point human profound quality is just a deception since everything that happens would be viewed as a need. In the event that all events are set in time normally without aggravations, at that point there would be no space for unethical behavior since ethical quality would not exist.>
