I. WRITTEN COMMUNICATION
Demonstrate effective development, interpretation and
expression of ideas through written communication.
Description: Assignments to be assessed for the communication competency requires students to present a
grammatically correct essay effectively organized with an introduction, conclusion, thesis statement, supportive
reasoning, and appropriately documented evidence.
Objectives:
⢠Focused
⢠Organized
⢠Correct grammar
⢠Spelling
⢠Style
⢠Follow the assignment
⢠Bibliography
⢠Format
II. CRITICAL THINKING
Critical Thinking Core Objective: Students will engage in creative thinking, innovation, and inquiry analysis,
evaluation, synthesis of information, organizing concepts, and constructing solutions.
Description: Students will respond to the reading assignment of the Constitution and will demonstrate critically
thinking, innovation and inquiry, and demonstrate analysis, evaluation, and synthesis of information.
Objectives:
⢠Inquiry o Analytical interpretation of the document.
o Investigation of alternative points.
⢠Analysis o Problem-solving methods.
o Dissect and fully understand and explain.
⢠Synthesis o Logical deductions to form an argument.
o A student may use new or existing concepts.
⢠Product
o Supply a coherent conclusion or solution to the historical inquiry
III. SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Social Responsibility Core Objective: Students will demonstrate intercultural competence and civic knowledge by engaging effectively in local, regional, national and global communities.
Description: The essay will demonstrate intercultural competence, knowledge of civic responsibility, and the
ability to engage effectively in local, regional, national, and global communities.
Objectives:
⢠Citizenship â civic identity as it relates to the surrounding culture.
⢠Social Justice- The treatment of others in a fair, nondiscriminatory and ethical manner.
⢠Ecology- The relationship between living organisms with respect to each other and their natural environment.
IV. PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY
Personal Responsibility Core Objective: Students will demonstrate the ability to connect choices, actions, and
consequences of ethical decision-making.
Description: The essay will demonstrate the ability to connect choices, actions, and consequences to ethical
decision-making.
Objectives:
⢠Inquiry
o The critical inquiry may involve the analytical interpretation of evidence and arguments.
o The interpretive inquiry may include an investigation into alternative points of view.
⢠Connections- The use of research or content knowledge to enhance and clarify the argument/discussion.
⢠Response-The extent to which a meaningful, personal connection is made to the ethical dilemma.
o How does the Constitution apply to you and why?
⢠To be written in the first person.
1) CHOOSE 4 ARTICLES OF THE CONSTITUTION TO ANALYZE. YOU CAN CHOOSE TO
AGREE/DISAGREE WITH AN ARTICLE YOU CHOOSE. BUT YOU MUST FOLLOW THE CRITERIA BELOW:
- DO YOU AGREE WITH IT? WHY? EXPLAIN WITH EXAMPLES
-DOES IT APPLY TO TODAY’S SOCIETY? HOW? WITH EXAMPLES
-HOW IT APPLIES TO ME, WHY WITH EXAMPLES
———–OR———–
-DO YOU DISAGREE? WHY? EXPLAIN WITH EXAMPLES, GIVE A SOLUTION, SOLVE THE PROBLEM
WITH EXAMPLES
-WHY IT DOES’NT APPLY TO TODAY’S SOCIETY WITH EXAMPLES
- HOW IT DOES’NT APPLY TO ME. WHY? WITH EXAMPLES
Sample Solution
There were a few measurable markers that agents used to attach Gacy to the homicides. A portion of these include fiber investigation, dental and radiology records, utilizing the disintegration procedure of the human body, and facial recreation in recognizing the people in question. Examiners discovered filaments that took after human hair in both Gacy’s vehicle and close to the slither space where the bodies were covered. Notwithstanding these hair tests, examiners additionally discovered filaments that contained hints of Gacy’s blood and semen in a similar region. Blood having a place with the casualties was found on a portion of the strands, which would later legitimately attach Gacy to the violations. The strands in Gacy’s vehicle were broke down by criminological researchers and coordinated Piest’s hair tests. Moreover, the pursuit hounds that confirmed that Piest had been in Gacy’s vehicle showed this by a “demise response”, which told specialists that Piest’s dead body had been within Gacy’s vehicle. Out of Gacy’s 33 known casualties, just 25 were ever convincingly distinguished. A significant number of Gacy’s casualties had comparative physical portrayals and were in this way difficult to recognize by simply asking the general population. To recognize the people in question, specialists went to Betty Pat Gatliff, a pioneer in criminological science and facial reproduction. Facial reproduction is the way toward reproducing the facial highlights of a person by utilizing their remaining parts. Certain facial highlights, for example, facial structures, nasal structure, and generally face shape can be valuable in distinguishing a casualty even long in the afterlife. By utilizing these highlights, and with the assistance of program, criminological agents can make a picture of an individual’s face, which is instrumental in recognizing casualties after their bodies have rotted. Facial recreation should be possible in a few measurements. Two-dimensional facial reproductions is utilized with skull radiographs and depend on pre-passing photos and data. Be that as it may, this can’t perfect on the grounds that cranial highlights are not constantly obvious or at the correct scale (Downing). So as to get a sensible and progressively precise delineation of the casualty’s face, a craftsman and a scientific anthropologist are normally essential (Downing). Three-dimensional facial remaking is finished by figures or high goals, three-dimensional pictures. PC programs can make facial reproductions by controlling filtered photos of the remaining parts and use approximations to reproduce facial highlights. These will in general produce results that don’t look counterfeit (Reichs and Craig 491). Here and there, specialists will utilize a strategy called superimposition as a procedure for facial recreation. Tragically, it’s anything but a regularly utilized technique, as it expects examiners to have some information about the personality of the remaining parts they are managing. By superimposing a photo of a person over the skeletal remains, specialists can check whether the facial highlights line up with the anatomical highlights, permitting them to distinguish a casualty. On account of John Wayne Gacy’s casualties, specialists had the option to utilize facial reproduction to distinguish nine of the bodies found in the slither space. The accompanying realistic shows the facial recreations of these nine casualties: Since facial recreation was insufficient to distinguish the entirety of the people in question, examiners got DNA profiles from every one of the unidentified casualties and effectively searched out DNA tests from guys over the United States who had been accounted for missing somewhere in the range of 1970 and 1979 (Cook County Sheriff’s Office 3).>
There were a few measurable markers that agents used to attach Gacy to the homicides. A portion of these include fiber investigation, dental and radiology records, utilizing the disintegration procedure of the human body, and facial recreation in recognizing the people in question. Examiners discovered filaments that took after human hair in both Gacy’s vehicle and close to the slither space where the bodies were covered. Notwithstanding these hair tests, examiners additionally discovered filaments that contained hints of Gacy’s blood and semen in a similar region. Blood having a place with the casualties was found on a portion of the strands, which would later legitimately attach Gacy to the violations. The strands in Gacy’s vehicle were broke down by criminological researchers and coordinated Piest’s hair tests. Moreover, the pursuit hounds that confirmed that Piest had been in Gacy’s vehicle showed this by a “demise response”, which told specialists that Piest’s dead body had been within Gacy’s vehicle. Out of Gacy’s 33 known casualties, just 25 were ever convincingly distinguished. A significant number of Gacy’s casualties had comparative physical portrayals and were in this way difficult to recognize by simply asking the general population. To recognize the people in question, specialists went to Betty Pat Gatliff, a pioneer in criminological science and facial reproduction. Facial reproduction is the way toward reproducing the facial highlights of a person by utilizing their remaining parts. Certain facial highlights, for example, facial structures, nasal structure, and generally face shape can be valuable in distinguishing a casualty even long in the afterlife. By utilizing these highlights, and with the assistance of program, criminological agents can make a picture of an individual’s face, which is instrumental in recognizing casualties after their bodies have rotted. Facial recreation should be possible in a few measurements. Two-dimensional facial reproductions is utilized with skull radiographs and depend on pre-passing photos and data. Be that as it may, this can’t perfect on the grounds that cranial highlights are not constantly obvious or at the correct scale (Downing). So as to get a sensible and progressively precise delineation of the casualty’s face, a craftsman and a scientific anthropologist are normally essential (Downing). Three-dimensional facial remaking is finished by figures or high goals, three-dimensional pictures. PC programs can make facial reproductions by controlling filtered photos of the remaining parts and use approximations to reproduce facial highlights. These will in general produce results that don’t look counterfeit (Reichs and Craig 491). Here and there, specialists will utilize a strategy called superimposition as a procedure for facial recreation. Tragically, it’s anything but a regularly utilized technique, as it expects examiners to have some information about the personality of the remaining parts they are managing. By superimposing a photo of a person over the skeletal remains, specialists can check whether the facial highlights line up with the anatomical highlights, permitting them to distinguish a casualty. On account of John Wayne Gacy’s casualties, specialists had the option to utilize facial reproduction to distinguish nine of the bodies found in the slither space. The accompanying realistic shows the facial recreations of these nine casualties: Since facial recreation was insufficient to distinguish the entirety of the people in question, examiners got DNA profiles from every one of the unidentified casualties and effectively searched out DNA tests from guys over the United States who had been accounted for missing somewhere in the range of 1970 and 1979 (Cook County Sheriff’s Office 3).>
