Directions Develop four well-developed paragraphs about the TV show you watched, keeping a clear focus on the portrayal of gender in the show.In the first paragraph, give a brief summary of the episodes you watched. In the second and third paragraphs, discuss how gender roles play out in the episodes you watched. You may discuss the roles of one male and one female character, or the different roles of two female characters, or you may focus both paragraphs on one male or female character. In the fourth paragraph, discuss how gender roles either conform to or challenge the gender stereotypes discussed in at least ONE of the readings. Provide clear and specific examples from the episodes. Provide quotes/paraphrases from the selected readings. Remember to provide in-text citations in MLA format for both the TV shows you watched and the reading(s) you selected. Also remember to add a Works Cited at the end of your analysis. (Don’t forget to cite each episode you watched, as well as the articles.
Sample Solution
The atmosphere of planet Earth has been exposed to huge changes, especially in regular temperature and climate designs, since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, around the year 1750. Since that time, the atmosphere has been progressively affected by anthropogenic drivers, for example, carbon dioxide and methane generation. Expanding convergences of these gases have prompted changes in accessible living space for some life forms, extraordinary climate examples and ocean level ascent, just as consequences for the wellbeing and economy of the human populace. As per the U.S. Ecological Protection Agency, changes in worldwide atmosphere can effectsly affect where species can live, how they communicate, and the planning of key life occasions, all of which can effectsly affect biological systems. For instance, one investigation demonstrates that Northeastern fowls that regularly spend the winter in the southern United States have been returning north in the spring 13 days sooner than they completed 100 years back (United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2017). Moves in relocation like this can result in constrained nourishment accessibility and changes to rearing cycles. A few animal groups have been moving their livable range because of changes in their typical ecological range, causing environment changes en route. For instance, as boreal woodlands attack the tundra, the living spaces of caribou, ice foxes, and frigid owls become incredibly decreased, as they rely upon the tundra condition for their territory (United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2017). Another normal case of this negative impact is the move in living space for the polar bear. The polar bear relies upon ocean ice for its living space, just as its chasing grounds, where it uses gaps in the ice to chase for seals. As the worldwide temperature expands, the mount of ocean ice inclusion diminishes, which decreases the capacity for the polar bear to get to its conventional nourishment supply. The loss of environment is sensational for the polar bear, as it can’t just move more remote north as different species can, since it as of now lives in the northernmost region of the planet. Consequently, the polar bear is an imperiled species because of the proceeded with impacts of worldwide environmental change. The point of worldwide ocean level ascent has been a piece of worldwide environmental change look into for quite a while, yet late discoveries demonstrate that the change is quickening instead of expanding at a consistent rate. The new investigation depends on 25 years of NASA and European satellite information and demonstrates that the quickening can possibly twofold the ocean level ascent by 2100 that had once been anticipated dependent on a consistent increment in ocean level. On the off chance that the rate keeps on expanding at its ebb and flow pace, ocean level could be 65 cm higher than it is today continuously 2100 (Weeman, 2018). The ascent of ocean surface dimensions are because of increments in worldwide temperature, which results in two kinds of changes. To begin with, the expanding temperature softens the ice sheets, discharging more water into the sea. Second, the expansion of this hotter water and the general increment in sea temperature causes warm extension (because of hydrogen holding) of the sea waters, which means the volume of the water increments as an immediate impact of the temperature increment. Around the globe, even little increments in ocean level can cause disastrous changes in living spaces, for people and natural life alike. Beach front populaces, particularly those that exist nearer to ebb and flow ocean level will lose utilization of the land, including homes, organizations and other framework in the zone. Populaces should move further inland, further focusing on the effectively thick human populace, especially in nations like the U.S. what’s more, China. Changes in ocean level will likewise influence land staying creatures and vegetation, which can make disturbances beach front biological systems and in the long run inland environments, as species that can move inland infringe on other set up environments. Worldwide environmental change likewise has potential wellbeing impacts on people. As indicated by the Executive Summary of the Impacts of Climate Change on Human Health in the United States, environmental change influences nourishment and water sources, the air that individuals inhale, the climate, and connections with both the regular and manufactured conditions. Expanded temperatures can prompt locally outrageous warmth occasions, expanding the recurrence of warmth related ailments and passings, particularly for the older, youthful kids, and those with incessant sicknesses. Climate examples and ocean level ascent will disturb framework and cause coast flooding, which will contrarily effect access to basic administrations like power, clean water, and crisis administrations (Crimmins, 2016). The adjustments in occasional climate examples will influence sustenance and water quality just as changes in irresistible operators, which will improve the probability of nourishment, water and vector-borne sicknesses, for example, Lyme illness (Crimmins, 2016). Despite the fact that there is a plenitude of proof supporting the issue of worldwide environmental change, naysayers still exist, utilizing disinformation techniques to confound people in general and defer activity on remediation endeavors. A significant number of these enormous associations get the vast majority of their financing from huge oil organizations, whose organizations won’t profit by authoritative activity for remediating environmental change. Be that as it may, the presently most vital partner bunch that contradicts environmental change is the Trump organization. It is hard to condense the significant positions against environmental difference in this organization, since the majority of the contentions have since a long time ago been refuted by numerous logical reports. For instance, Scott Pruitt, the ebb and flow EPA overseer questions “whether we can quantify ‘with accuracy’ the job of people on the atmosphere,” and he proposed, in light of this, that people may not be the real driver of an unnatural weather change (Mooney, 2017). As an impression of this position, the present organization has returned to the eco-friendliness measures recently set up by the Obama organization, a starting advance towards turning around the push to bring down carbon outflows. In view of the unconfirmed contention that environmental change isn’t completely brought about by people, the Trump organization has pushed toward settling for the easiest option, defunding real atmosphere research ventures, precluding environmental change as a national security danger, and even brought down the environmental change pages of the Environmental Protection Agency site (Greshko, 2018). The rundown of partners and associations that back the issue of environmental change is long and significant. One such association is the U.S. Worldwide Change Research Program. In the 2017 Executive Summary, it is expressed that the worldwide normal surface air temperature has expanded 1.8°F in the course of the most recent 115 years, which is the hottest ever of human progress (Wuebbles, 2017). The report reasons that the emotional changes are incredibly prone to be because of the adjustments in human exercises, in light of broad proof. The most significant point that is made in the official outline is the positive relationship between’s the expansion in anthropogenic generation of ozone depleting substance emanations and the numerous unfriendly impacts on the worldwide atmosphere and the Earth frameworks, including ocean surface temperature, sea fermentation, ocean level ascent, air contamination, and softening ice sheets. The measure of logical proof supporting worldwide environmental change is significant and there are various sources that can be talked about. The most usually talked about anthropogenic driver of the ebb and flow changes to the atmosphere is carbon dioxide. Carbon dioxide is a noteworthy contamination created by different procedures in human industry, for example, the fumes from burning motors in vehicles. Carbon dioxide is an ozone depleting substance, implying that it traps heat that is transmitting once again from the Earth’s surface, which at first touched base as sun powered radiation. Because of its capacity to build the normal worldwide temperature of the air, it turns out to be a piece of a few in number positive input circles, which intensify its impact. For instance, the expanding temperature of the environment permits more ocean ice and snow to dissolve, diminishing the planet’s albedo, or capacity to reflect sun powered radiation, which enables more radiation to be ingested at the surface, further expanding surface temperature. Liquefying of this snow and ice can likewise quicken the breakdown of natural issue from beneath the permafrost, discharging more carbon from the long haul cycle into the transient cycle, which will further add to the positive criticism circle (Schuur, 2015). The connection between the expansion in air carbon dioxide and surface temperature is unequivocally related, as appeared in the figure from Climate Central:>
The atmosphere of planet Earth has been exposed to huge changes, especially in regular temperature and climate designs, since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, around the year 1750. Since that time, the atmosphere has been progressively affected by anthropogenic drivers, for example, carbon dioxide and methane generation. Expanding convergences of these gases have prompted changes in accessible living space for some life forms, extraordinary climate examples and ocean level ascent, just as consequences for the wellbeing and economy of the human populace. As per the U.S. Ecological Protection Agency, changes in worldwide atmosphere can effectsly affect where species can live, how they communicate, and the planning of key life occasions, all of which can effectsly affect biological systems. For instance, one investigation demonstrates that Northeastern fowls that regularly spend the winter in the southern United States have been returning north in the spring 13 days sooner than they completed 100 years back (United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2017). Moves in relocation like this can result in constrained nourishment accessibility and changes to rearing cycles. A few animal groups have been moving their livable range because of changes in their typical ecological range, causing environment changes en route. For instance, as boreal woodlands attack the tundra, the living spaces of caribou, ice foxes, and frigid owls become incredibly decreased, as they rely upon the tundra condition for their territory (United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2017). Another normal case of this negative impact is the move in living space for the polar bear. The polar bear relies upon ocean ice for its living space, just as its chasing grounds, where it uses gaps in the ice to chase for seals. As the worldwide temperature expands, the mount of ocean ice inclusion diminishes, which decreases the capacity for the polar bear to get to its conventional nourishment supply. The loss of environment is sensational for the polar bear, as it can’t just move more remote north as different species can, since it as of now lives in the northernmost region of the planet. Consequently, the polar bear is an imperiled species because of the proceeded with impacts of worldwide environmental change. The point of worldwide ocean level ascent has been a piece of worldwide environmental change look into for quite a while, yet late discoveries demonstrate that the change is quickening instead of expanding at a consistent rate. The new investigation depends on 25 years of NASA and European satellite information and demonstrates that the quickening can possibly twofold the ocean level ascent by 2100 that had once been anticipated dependent on a consistent increment in ocean level. On the off chance that the rate keeps on expanding at its ebb and flow pace, ocean level could be 65 cm higher than it is today continuously 2100 (Weeman, 2018). The ascent of ocean surface dimensions are because of increments in worldwide temperature, which results in two kinds of changes. To begin with, the expanding temperature softens the ice sheets, discharging more water into the sea. Second, the expansion of this hotter water and the general increment in sea temperature causes warm extension (because of hydrogen holding) of the sea waters, which means the volume of the water increments as an immediate impact of the temperature increment. Around the globe, even little increments in ocean level can cause disastrous changes in living spaces, for people and natural life alike. Beach front populaces, particularly those that exist nearer to ebb and flow ocean level will lose utilization of the land, including homes, organizations and other framework in the zone. Populaces should move further inland, further focusing on the effectively thick human populace, especially in nations like the U.S. what’s more, China. Changes in ocean level will likewise influence land staying creatures and vegetation, which can make disturbances beach front biological systems and in the long run inland environments, as species that can move inland infringe on other set up environments. Worldwide environmental change likewise has potential wellbeing impacts on people. As indicated by the Executive Summary of the Impacts of Climate Change on Human Health in the United States, environmental change influences nourishment and water sources, the air that individuals inhale, the climate, and connections with both the regular and manufactured conditions. Expanded temperatures can prompt locally outrageous warmth occasions, expanding the recurrence of warmth related ailments and passings, particularly for the older, youthful kids, and those with incessant sicknesses. Climate examples and ocean level ascent will disturb framework and cause coast flooding, which will contrarily effect access to basic administrations like power, clean water, and crisis administrations (Crimmins, 2016). The adjustments in occasional climate examples will influence sustenance and water quality just as changes in irresistible operators, which will improve the probability of nourishment, water and vector-borne sicknesses, for example, Lyme illness (Crimmins, 2016). Despite the fact that there is a plenitude of proof supporting the issue of worldwide environmental change, naysayers still exist, utilizing disinformation techniques to confound people in general and defer activity on remediation endeavors. A significant number of these enormous associations get the vast majority of their financing from huge oil organizations, whose organizations won’t profit by authoritative activity for remediating environmental change. Be that as it may, the presently most vital partner bunch that contradicts environmental change is the Trump organization. It is hard to condense the significant positions against environmental difference in this organization, since the majority of the contentions have since a long time ago been refuted by numerous logical reports. For instance, Scott Pruitt, the ebb and flow EPA overseer questions “whether we can quantify ‘with accuracy’ the job of people on the atmosphere,” and he proposed, in light of this, that people may not be the real driver of an unnatural weather change (Mooney, 2017). As an impression of this position, the present organization has returned to the eco-friendliness measures recently set up by the Obama organization, a starting advance towards turning around the push to bring down carbon outflows. In view of the unconfirmed contention that environmental change isn’t completely brought about by people, the Trump organization has pushed toward settling for the easiest option, defunding real atmosphere research ventures, precluding environmental change as a national security danger, and even brought down the environmental change pages of the Environmental Protection Agency site (Greshko, 2018). The rundown of partners and associations that back the issue of environmental change is long and significant. One such association is the U.S. Worldwide Change Research Program. In the 2017 Executive Summary, it is expressed that the worldwide normal surface air temperature has expanded 1.8°F in the course of the most recent 115 years, which is the hottest ever of human progress (Wuebbles, 2017). The report reasons that the emotional changes are incredibly prone to be because of the adjustments in human exercises, in light of broad proof. The most significant point that is made in the official outline is the positive relationship between’s the expansion in anthropogenic generation of ozone depleting substance emanations and the numerous unfriendly impacts on the worldwide atmosphere and the Earth frameworks, including ocean surface temperature, sea fermentation, ocean level ascent, air contamination, and softening ice sheets. The measure of logical proof supporting worldwide environmental change is significant and there are various sources that can be talked about. The most usually talked about anthropogenic driver of the ebb and flow changes to the atmosphere is carbon dioxide. Carbon dioxide is a noteworthy contamination created by different procedures in human industry, for example, the fumes from burning motors in vehicles. Carbon dioxide is an ozone depleting substance, implying that it traps heat that is transmitting once again from the Earth’s surface, which at first touched base as sun powered radiation. Because of its capacity to build the normal worldwide temperature of the air, it turns out to be a piece of a few in number positive input circles, which intensify its impact. For instance, the expanding temperature of the environment permits more ocean ice and snow to dissolve, diminishing the planet’s albedo, or capacity to reflect sun powered radiation, which enables more radiation to be ingested at the surface, further expanding surface temperature. Liquefying of this snow and ice can likewise quicken the breakdown of natural issue from beneath the permafrost, discharging more carbon from the long haul cycle into the transient cycle, which will further add to the positive criticism circle (Schuur, 2015). The connection between the expansion in air carbon dioxide and surface temperature is unequivocally related, as appeared in the figure from Climate Central:>
