Select two styles of dance, such as ballet, modern dance, or folk dance.
Describe each style of dance and include the following:
History and development of the style
Discussion of your understanding of the use of line, form, repetition, and rhythm in each piece
Sample Solution
y circulated over space nor arbitrarily appropriated. Or maybe, they happen in some type of groups or patterns. Various specialists have recognized different sociological, transient, and conduct attributes of guilty parties and wrongdoing areas that illuminate the non-irregular nature of wrongdoing grouping as Chainey and Ratcliffe (2005) have talked about in their exploration. Looking at both reasonable decision point of view (Cornish and Clarke 1986, 1987; Clarke and Felson, 1993) and dialog of routine exercises hypothesis (Cohen and Felson, 1979; Felson, 1998) Brantingham and Brantingham (1993a) explained the possibility that wrongdoings happen as criminally inspired when people come into contact with appropriate focuses as they travel among places and through regions that are known to them and wherein they are agreeable (mindfulness spaces). Further, they expressed that wrongdoings happen inside urban communities where criminal conduct is exceptionally designed and as often as possible confined (Brantingham and Brantingham, 1993b). Brantingham and Brantingham (1993a) contended that specific regions will encounter unbalanced measure of various sorts of wrongdoing due to the recently arrangement structure on urban regions and furthermore the individuals inside the group in that. In the event that this thought is joined with place-explicit endeavors by wrongdoing avoidance specialists to decrease wrongdoing then it is truly worried about the dislodging of wrongdoing. The focal fundamental of uprooting concerns is that criminally inspired wrongdoers, when kept from carrying out wrongdoing at a specific area or with a certain goal in mind, won’t be deterred from guiltiness yet will essentially be dislodged to perpetrate wrongdoing in some different habits. Repetto (1974), Hakim and Rengert (1981) distinguished five types of relocation as the consequence of blocked criminal chances. The initial three are worldly dislodging where the hour of the offense changes, spatial uprooting where the area changes, and target removal where the objective changes. Different sorts of uprooting incorporate technique dislodging, where the strategy the guilty party uses to submit the offense changes, lastly type removal, where the wrongdoer changes from one kind of offense to an>
y circulated over space nor arbitrarily appropriated. Or maybe, they happen in some type of groups or patterns. Various specialists have recognized different sociological, transient, and conduct attributes of guilty parties and wrongdoing areas that illuminate the non-irregular nature of wrongdoing grouping as Chainey and Ratcliffe (2005) have talked about in their exploration. Looking at both reasonable decision point of view (Cornish and Clarke 1986, 1987; Clarke and Felson, 1993) and dialog of routine exercises hypothesis (Cohen and Felson, 1979; Felson, 1998) Brantingham and Brantingham (1993a) explained the possibility that wrongdoings happen as criminally inspired when people come into contact with appropriate focuses as they travel among places and through regions that are known to them and wherein they are agreeable (mindfulness spaces). Further, they expressed that wrongdoings happen inside urban communities where criminal conduct is exceptionally designed and as often as possible confined (Brantingham and Brantingham, 1993b). Brantingham and Brantingham (1993a) contended that specific regions will encounter unbalanced measure of various sorts of wrongdoing due to the recently arrangement structure on urban regions and furthermore the individuals inside the group in that. In the event that this thought is joined with place-explicit endeavors by wrongdoing avoidance specialists to decrease wrongdoing then it is truly worried about the dislodging of wrongdoing. The focal fundamental of uprooting concerns is that criminally inspired wrongdoers, when kept from carrying out wrongdoing at a specific area or with a certain goal in mind, won’t be deterred from guiltiness yet will essentially be dislodged to perpetrate wrongdoing in some different habits. Repetto (1974), Hakim and Rengert (1981) distinguished five types of relocation as the consequence of blocked criminal chances. The initial three are worldly dislodging where the hour of the offense changes, spatial uprooting where the area changes, and target removal where the objective changes. Different sorts of uprooting incorporate technique dislodging, where the strategy the guilty party uses to submit the offense changes, lastly type removal, where the wrongdoer changes from one kind of offense to an>
