You have just won the mayoral race for your city. Youâve read the Nicholson textbook and noted that Page 240 begins to list the significant contributions of legal advice necessary to have a âfully adequate, feasible, or acceptableâ plan (Lister and Stockdale as cited by Nicholson,2012) . You now understand the challenges faced in joining EMCâs and LGAâs to prepare for emergency operations.
Your municipal police and local government attorneys have not held a disaster planning meeting in over five years. In 1000-1250 words write a local statute for presentation to your city council that outlines your plan to overcome this deficit, how to fund it, and operational aspects (including frequency, personnel required, etc.) Consider the limiting factors presented by Nicholson in Chapter 14.
Sample Solution
Privacy is the state of being left alone, being concealed or secluded, being free from publicity, scrutiny, surveillance, and unauthorized disclosure of oneâs information. Data privacy is the application of these principles to information technology. The International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) Glossary notes that data or information privacy is the âclaim of individuals, groups or institutions to determine for themselves when, how, and to what extent information about them is communicated to others.â Data protection, on the other hand, is the process of safeguarding important information from corruption, compromise or loss. In his article Data Privacy v. Data Protection, David Robinson clarifies that âdata protection is essentially a technical issue, whereas data privacy is a legal one.â This distinction matters because the terms are often used interchangeably in popular discourse, but do not mean the same thing. It is important to keep in mind that the laws and regulations that cover âmanagement of personal informationâ are typically grouped under âprivacy policyâ in the U.S. and under âprotection policyâ in the EU. Because the European Parliament has framed the GDPR as a âprotection policyâ, many people believe that the GDPR creates a morally superior regime to that which currently exists in the U.S. However, this belief conflates the value of privacy with a secular set of technical requirements on data protection. In addition, while the EUâs regulator for data protection, labels itself as the âglobal gold standardâ, this assertion is not yet warranted because various critical components of the GDPR such as data portability and the right to erasure are still being tested both in the marketplace and the courts. As a growing number of tech executives assert the need for new broad-sweeping federal privacy legislation in the U.S., many Americans are being persuaded by lofty descriptions of the GDPRâcontrasting them with what they see as a morally inferior laissez faire approach at homeâboth because they confuse data privacy and protection and because they are not aware of Americaâs own substantive personal informational privacy protections developed since the founding of our country. In addition, U.S. constituentsâ skewed understanding of their countryâs privacy framework exists, in part, due to the growing number of journalists who refer to the U.S. as the âwild west,â as if there are no laws or regulations on data privacy and protection. In reality, the U.S. privacy and data protection regime is arguably the oldest, most robust, well developed and effective in the world. The EUâs laws are relatively new, officially dating from this century, and still lack the history of judicial scrutiny and case law that characterizes U.S. law. The FTC is the most influential government body that enforces privacy and data protection in the U.S. It oversees essentially all business conduct in the country affecting interstate c>
Privacy is the state of being left alone, being concealed or secluded, being free from publicity, scrutiny, surveillance, and unauthorized disclosure of oneâs information. Data privacy is the application of these principles to information technology. The International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) Glossary notes that data or information privacy is the âclaim of individuals, groups or institutions to determine for themselves when, how, and to what extent information about them is communicated to others.â Data protection, on the other hand, is the process of safeguarding important information from corruption, compromise or loss. In his article Data Privacy v. Data Protection, David Robinson clarifies that âdata protection is essentially a technical issue, whereas data privacy is a legal one.â This distinction matters because the terms are often used interchangeably in popular discourse, but do not mean the same thing. It is important to keep in mind that the laws and regulations that cover âmanagement of personal informationâ are typically grouped under âprivacy policyâ in the U.S. and under âprotection policyâ in the EU. Because the European Parliament has framed the GDPR as a âprotection policyâ, many people believe that the GDPR creates a morally superior regime to that which currently exists in the U.S. However, this belief conflates the value of privacy with a secular set of technical requirements on data protection. In addition, while the EUâs regulator for data protection, labels itself as the âglobal gold standardâ, this assertion is not yet warranted because various critical components of the GDPR such as data portability and the right to erasure are still being tested both in the marketplace and the courts. As a growing number of tech executives assert the need for new broad-sweeping federal privacy legislation in the U.S., many Americans are being persuaded by lofty descriptions of the GDPRâcontrasting them with what they see as a morally inferior laissez faire approach at homeâboth because they confuse data privacy and protection and because they are not aware of Americaâs own substantive personal informational privacy protections developed since the founding of our country. In addition, U.S. constituentsâ skewed understanding of their countryâs privacy framework exists, in part, due to the growing number of journalists who refer to the U.S. as the âwild west,â as if there are no laws or regulations on data privacy and protection. In reality, the U.S. privacy and data protection regime is arguably the oldest, most robust, well developed and effective in the world. The EUâs laws are relatively new, officially dating from this century, and still lack the history of judicial scrutiny and case law that characterizes U.S. law. The FTC is the most influential government body that enforces privacy and data protection in the U.S. It oversees essentially all business conduct in the country affecting interstate c>
