four of the types of intelligences from Gardnerâs list. Describe how at least two intelligences relate to your way of thinking and give examples from your nursing practice.
the positive or negative impact of using multiple intelligences when mentoring nurses (those with experienced and/or novice nurses). Include specific examples from your nursing practice/experience.
how to improve the mentoring/learning process using the concepts of multiple intelligences.
Fully details how using the concepts of multiple intelligences can improve the mentoring/learning process
Addresses 4 multiple intelligences from Gardner’s list. Discusses how at least 2 relate to your nursing practice, with clear examples
Sample Solution
epression as a pointer of reduced mental wellbeing by referencing most research ponders that have examined this relationship, have neglected to moreover explore the positive connection between’s on-line kinships and different markers of poor mental wellbeing, for example, tension and confidence. This oversight shows an absence of legitimacy with respect to the exploration led. Regardless of this, there is a relationship present between on-line companionships and decreased mental wellbeing. Confidence is another marker of mental wellbeing that is basic to mull over when researching the connection between on-line fellowships and decreased mental wellbeing in young people (Pantic, 2014). It is imperative to get whether there is likewise a relationship present between the utilization of DP to create on-line kinships, and low degrees of confidence. Confidence alludes to a person’s sure and contrary impression of their own worth (Mehdizadeh, 2010). Mehdizadeh (2010) moreover expresses that the control of one’s confidence is a need that each individual holds since it goes about as a wellspring of inspiration, thus why confidence is viewed as a significant marker of mental wellbeing. Albeit once more, the connection between on-line companionships and low degrees of confidence isn’t one that is causal. There is a variety of articles that do approve the positive connection between’s on-line fellowships and lower levels of confidence, especially among the pre-adult populace. Seabrook, Kern and Rickard (2016) examine the negative outcomes of on-line fellowships by alluding to the possibility of examination. O’Keeffe and Clarke-Pearson (2011) further depicts Facebook specifically, as a DP that is usually used to post photographs of individuals living it up and to post announcements sharing incredible accomplishments. O’Keefe (2011) and Turner-August (2014) both express that these steady shows of bliss and happiness can drive teenagers to contrast their very own lives and the lives of their on-line companions, bringing about lower levels of confidence. While considering the unnecessary measure of time spent on Facebook by most youths, these correlations are incredibly negative to their mental prosperity. A dependence on DP is an inexorably basic idea that has as of late prompted a reliance on-line companionships, and this reliance on-line fellowships subsequently prompts the negligence of individual up close and personal kinships (Pantic, 2014). As referenced beforehand, this carelessness of individual up close and personal companionships is emphatically corresponded with reduced mental wellbeing for youths particularly. Dependence is a reason for lessened mental wellbeing as it shows a few social issues, for example, habitual conduct and serious over-dependence’s (LaRose and Eastin, 2004). DP and its addictive nature is incredibly tricky for young people. Teenagers feel this over the top need to keep up on-line companionships as a methods for maintaining a strategic distance from a Fear of Missing Out or FOMO, thusly counteracting the upkeep of eye to eye kinships (Sharma, 2015). This results in less fortunate degrees of mental wellbeing in teenagers, by the by the relationship isn’t causal. The examination exhibited by Sharma (2015) includes an adjusted FOMO scale and an altered compulsion scale. Both of these scales present>
epression as a pointer of reduced mental wellbeing by referencing most research ponders that have examined this relationship, have neglected to moreover explore the positive connection between’s on-line kinships and different markers of poor mental wellbeing, for example, tension and confidence. This oversight shows an absence of legitimacy with respect to the exploration led. Regardless of this, there is a relationship present between on-line companionships and decreased mental wellbeing. Confidence is another marker of mental wellbeing that is basic to mull over when researching the connection between on-line fellowships and decreased mental wellbeing in young people (Pantic, 2014). It is imperative to get whether there is likewise a relationship present between the utilization of DP to create on-line kinships, and low degrees of confidence. Confidence alludes to a person’s sure and contrary impression of their own worth (Mehdizadeh, 2010). Mehdizadeh (2010) moreover expresses that the control of one’s confidence is a need that each individual holds since it goes about as a wellspring of inspiration, thus why confidence is viewed as a significant marker of mental wellbeing. Albeit once more, the connection between on-line companionships and low degrees of confidence isn’t one that is causal. There is a variety of articles that do approve the positive connection between’s on-line fellowships and lower levels of confidence, especially among the pre-adult populace. Seabrook, Kern and Rickard (2016) examine the negative outcomes of on-line fellowships by alluding to the possibility of examination. O’Keeffe and Clarke-Pearson (2011) further depicts Facebook specifically, as a DP that is usually used to post photographs of individuals living it up and to post announcements sharing incredible accomplishments. O’Keefe (2011) and Turner-August (2014) both express that these steady shows of bliss and happiness can drive teenagers to contrast their very own lives and the lives of their on-line companions, bringing about lower levels of confidence. While considering the unnecessary measure of time spent on Facebook by most youths, these correlations are incredibly negative to their mental prosperity. A dependence on DP is an inexorably basic idea that has as of late prompted a reliance on-line companionships, and this reliance on-line fellowships subsequently prompts the negligence of individual up close and personal kinships (Pantic, 2014). As referenced beforehand, this carelessness of individual up close and personal companionships is emphatically corresponded with reduced mental wellbeing for youths particularly. Dependence is a reason for lessened mental wellbeing as it shows a few social issues, for example, habitual conduct and serious over-dependence’s (LaRose and Eastin, 2004). DP and its addictive nature is incredibly tricky for young people. Teenagers feel this over the top need to keep up on-line companionships as a methods for maintaining a strategic distance from a Fear of Missing Out or FOMO, thusly counteracting the upkeep of eye to eye kinships (Sharma, 2015). This results in less fortunate degrees of mental wellbeing in teenagers, by the by the relationship isn’t causal. The examination exhibited by Sharma (2015) includes an adjusted FOMO scale and an altered compulsion scale. Both of these scales present>
