Describe the different styles of parenting described by Baumrind, explain which style of parenting you think is most effective.
Explain the difference between problem-focused coping and emotion-focused coping
Describe Milgramâs experiment on obedience, be sure to touch on the method and results.
Describe what is cognitive dissonance. Give an example of cognitive dissonance.
Explain the bystander effect and diffusion of responsibility.
Sample Solution
2014, it is not up-to-date concerning recent events. MichaÅ Lubinaâs well-researched book âRussia and china â a political marriage of convenience â stable and successfulâ mediates valuable knowledge on China. The currently published book âChinaâs Belt & Road Initiativeâ served as the main source regarding the initiative, in particular, the chapters by Francis Schortgen and Thomas Lairson. It is problematic to stay up-to-date concerning developments around the BRI, as it is a broad concept rather than a concrete plan and changes occur (Eder, 2018). The primary sources of the two last-named works are a wellspring for deeper insights and the paper is largely based on them. Competent knowledge was provided by John Ikenberryâs and Darren Limâs assessment of âChinaâs emerging institutional statecraftâ. Regarding the theoretical part, Tim Dunneâs and Brian Schmidtâs chapter on realism served as a primary source, followed by John Mearsheimerâs take on structural realism in âInternational Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversityâ, especially his knowledge on offensive realism. Figure 1â1 Map of BRI (Source: Merics as seen in Eder, 2018)3 Analysis After presenting offensive realism, the theory is consulted to explain what China seeks to achieve with the BRI and its implication on the international system. 3.1 Theory In realism the sovereign state is the unitary actor in a system where anarchy prevails, meaning there is no centralised authority, which governs all states. Consequently, states rely on themselves to ensure their prosperity, territorial integrity and sovereignty, which realism dubs the survival of the state, being the primary interest of all states (Dunne & Schmidt, 2017, pp.105-106). Moreover, states can never be certain about other statesâ true intentions (Mearsheimer, 2006, p.73). Thus, the foreign policy of a state, oriented on its national interest, must aim to maximising its power, as outlined by offensive realism, since possessing an overwhelming amount of power represents simply the soundest strategy to guarantee survival (Mearsheimer, 2006, p.72; Zürn, 19>
2014, it is not up-to-date concerning recent events. MichaÅ Lubinaâs well-researched book âRussia and china â a political marriage of convenience â stable and successfulâ mediates valuable knowledge on China. The currently published book âChinaâs Belt & Road Initiativeâ served as the main source regarding the initiative, in particular, the chapters by Francis Schortgen and Thomas Lairson. It is problematic to stay up-to-date concerning developments around the BRI, as it is a broad concept rather than a concrete plan and changes occur (Eder, 2018). The primary sources of the two last-named works are a wellspring for deeper insights and the paper is largely based on them. Competent knowledge was provided by John Ikenberryâs and Darren Limâs assessment of âChinaâs emerging institutional statecraftâ. Regarding the theoretical part, Tim Dunneâs and Brian Schmidtâs chapter on realism served as a primary source, followed by John Mearsheimerâs take on structural realism in âInternational Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversityâ, especially his knowledge on offensive realism. Figure 1â1 Map of BRI (Source: Merics as seen in Eder, 2018)3 Analysis After presenting offensive realism, the theory is consulted to explain what China seeks to achieve with the BRI and its implication on the international system. 3.1 Theory In realism the sovereign state is the unitary actor in a system where anarchy prevails, meaning there is no centralised authority, which governs all states. Consequently, states rely on themselves to ensure their prosperity, territorial integrity and sovereignty, which realism dubs the survival of the state, being the primary interest of all states (Dunne & Schmidt, 2017, pp.105-106). Moreover, states can never be certain about other statesâ true intentions (Mearsheimer, 2006, p.73). Thus, the foreign policy of a state, oriented on its national interest, must aim to maximising its power, as outlined by offensive realism, since possessing an overwhelming amount of power represents simply the soundest strategy to guarantee survival (Mearsheimer, 2006, p.72; Zürn, 19>