We can work on Supreme Court Interpretation of Law Descriptive Essay – Assignment Help

I need an explanation for this Political Science question to help me study.

Requirements for Midterm: Eight (8) pages. Title Page—not part of the page requirement—must include name, class, and title of your paper; Times New Roman, 12-point font with 1inch margins; and page numbers.

YOU WILL LOSE POINTS FOR NO TITLE PAGE, BIBLIOGRAPH/CITATION PAGE, OR PAGE NUMBERS.

In your answer, make sure to include a thesis statement and roadmap—you will lose points for not having your TS and RM in your FIRST paragraph.

Your paper must clearly have an argument. It must also include a beginning (thesis statement and roadmap), middle (evidence and summary of scholars/case e.t.c. and your argument), and an end (conclusion).

Respond to this statement:

“The Court follows the legal model and simply interprets the law.”

Using two (2) of the authors/theories that we have read in class so far describe how these two chosen theories adds to or complicates our understanding of the Court’s role as “simple interpreters of the law.” In your response, be sure to use current examples.

Th authors to be used can be

1 Barnum

2 Martin Sweet

3 George I. Lovell and Scott E. Lemieux

if you can not write the essay I am willing to just get help and I will pay for that too if you can help me find landmark court cases that prove that the Supreme Court doesn’t only intercept the law but also allows public opinion to sway their rulings.

Is this question part of your assignment?

Place order