How have you explored the profession of pharmacy? Please provide specific examples.
How have your past experiences and your career interests prepared you to excel in the healthcare field?
List your leadership skills and describe how these skills would positively impact the profession of Pharmacy.
Describe any community service related activities for which you have volunteered, and highlight any accomplishments.
Describe hobbies, recreational interests or other personally rewarding activities in which you participate, and elaborate on their importance to you.
You may use the space below to tell us anything else you would like us to know about you.
Sample Solution
Innovation fuse in the homeroom is the hypothesis, advancement, usage, the board, and assessment of procedures and assets for learning. Innovation is an expansive term that frequently portrays a control committed to strategies or approaches to make adapting increasingly proficient (Earle, R. S. 2000 ). It is the obligation of every instructor to give an instructive program that suitably underpins every youngster’s learning improvement and learning objectives. In an innovation based society, kids must comprehend and plan to be profitable, autonomous, imaginative, and educated people. Having legitimate access to innovation and having the option to utilize innovation is basic and will be one of the numerous abilities essential for later use in the working environment. Innovation is a vital device that kids use to beneficially complete thoughts, gain information abilities, and take care of issues. Innovation is both adaptable and inherently persuading to youngsters; it is perfect to extending the learning experience. Research on the viability of innovation has concentrated on advanced education, however look into additionally recommends that employments of explicit innovation can improve understudies of all evaluations learning abilities too. Innovation has numerous advantages. Innovation has numerous advantages; it permits understudy simple access to data, it offers an assortment of answers for issues and it has been utilized to improve understudies’ evaluations. Coordinating innovation in the study hall is helpful and enables understudies to be incorporated into society just as furnishing kids with boundless potential outcomes. Be that as it may, numerous teachers accept that acquainting youngsters with innovation is destructive. They accept that innovation supports apathy, can be costly, and that it meddles with youngsters associating with educators and their colleagues. With the goal for innovation to be appropriately utilized in the study hall, teachers must put time and be keen on getting the correct preparing required to have the option to compelling in coordinating innovation and not upsetting kids from appropriately learning. Despite the fact that utilizing innovation in the study hall has been discussed, all inclusive, fusing innovation in the study hall has been advantageous. Innovation tends to singular needs. Understudies need the chances to autonomously investigate complex issues and to develop, to gain from their friends, to reflect of their encounters, and to become mindful pioneers in their very own learning. Innovation prepares instructors and teachers to evaluate and have the option to concentrate on every individual’s understudy qualities and shortcomings. Lee (2002) proposed two methodologies that help instructors to evaluate the youngsters’ capacity to utilize innovation and its advantages on every understudy. First is a dominance learning approach that prompts the responsibility frameworks, which causes instructors to set principles for every understudy as they progress through the school educational program. Second, Lee (2002) recommended that instructors must build up a methodology which evaluates the youngster’s reasoning capacities. The two methodologies help to set a pattern from which teachers fill in as aides and spotlight on the acing aptitudes and information understudies need to meet necessities set out by the instructors to meet roundabout prerequisites. Innovation reconciliation in the homeroom. The company for open telecom (2011) demonstrates that innovation mix in the homerooms happens constantly after some time and pursues a succinct example. At first, educators fuse new bits of innovation into the customary study hall, in the end after some time, they watch changes in the understudy’s commitment among their friends, their conduct, and instructors at that point start to try different things with joining the utilization of innovation in new and progressively suitable manners. Be that as it may, all together for this procedure to be fruitful, it can take around four years or more from the underlying introduction of innovation to changes start to watch (organization for open telecom, 2011). In any case, crosswise over various rates, educators’ innovation utilizes in the study halls may vacillate contingent upon their very own convictions about innovation and the understudy’s general dominance of specific abilities. For instance, on the off chance that instructors have support from the two understudies and the leading body of training, at that point educators will feel increasingly able and secure to coordinate innovation. Generally backing and inspirational desires from the network and the organization will likewise affect educators’ convictions and their ability to incorporate innovation. Innovation in the study hall and its incorporation is a developmental procedure that requires practice. Innovation abilities must expand upon one another and it must co-advance as innovation is presented and acclimatized in the school culture. Innovation and evaluation scores. Lee (2009) analyzed a homeroom that utilized broad utilization of innovation to decide the distinctions on institutionalized appraisal scores among understudies who utilized PCs widely versus the individuals who had restricted PC use. Lee (2009) study found through the act of instructional strategies: 53% of educators utilized PCs as option in contrast to worksheets/exercise manuals, where as 53% of instructors use PCs for exercises, for example, audits, penetrates and rehearses, while 33% utilized PCs to advance community oriented learning(van Braak, Tondeur, &ump; Valcke, 2004; Lee, 2009). Be that as it may, PC instructional strategies changed the teaching method of learning. The investigation additionally discovered understudies’ innovation use into their day by day schedules in many classes was low notwithstanding the choices utilized. Another instructional strategy presented in Lee’s (2009) study is venture based learning. Further, he clarified that undertaking based learning empower students to learn while playing out an errand or movement. Difficulties of joining innovation in instruction. Research by Clark (1992) has indicated that joining innovation in the study hall regularly has numerous hindrances. To begin with, it has demonstrated that the training framework has gotten brought together, test driven, dreary, indifferent, and unimportant to the requesting always changing universe of the youngsters. The centralization denies instructors of the opportunity to arrange showing learning and seriously take an interest in the readiness of schedules or course readings. Additionally, this confiscates the instructors to freely compose getting the hang of as per every kid’s individual learning styles and needs. Lidstone and Stoltman (2006) archived that the absence of well-prepared teachers fills in as an obstruction to cutting edge learning in more than one school. As per them, instructors and approach producers need to accomplish amicability among objectives set out by the educators of the homeroom and the educational plan set out by the school, however so as to accomplish such a sensitive parity, they should put the fundamental devices as a result. Innovation can’t supplant the instructing techniques built up by the schools. Witt (2004) directed research about the effect of innovation on educators’ and understudies’ desires for learning and found that acquainting innovation upsets instructors’ frame of mind with have the option to appropriately educate. So as to understand such a problem, educators must figure out how to utilize innovation in a powerful way and must teach their understudies on the most proficient method to appropriately utilize innovation with the goal that understudies profit by it instead of be upset by it. Innovation and its Effectiveness. The issues engaged with assessing the adequacy of innovation in enlightenment are mind boggling. However innovation, used as an essential instilled actualize, must improve instructing, learning, and accomplishment. Instruction pioneers and policymakers are looked with questions and choices in regards to the usage of innovation. One of the key objectives of the No Child Left Behind Act is to upgrade instruction through innovation, with a particular spotlight on what works I mechanical applications (U.S. Division of Education, 2002a). Relatedly, the updated National Technology Plan (U.S. Branch of Education, 2000) explicitly calls for exact examinations to be directed in schools and homerooms that are intended to figure out which employments of innovation are most effective’under which conditions and with which understudies. Duty of Teachers Administrators and educators ought to get satisfactory, customized, and proceeding with training about how to best incorporate innovation into their schools and courses and ought to be assessed on their capability in doing as such. Overseers and educators are key innovative interfaces in the schools: one is answerable for carrying innovation into the locale or building, the other for carrying it into the study hall. They are likewise significant innovation partners. Fruitful mechanical executions will to a great extent rely on the inspiration, information, and aptitude of executives and instructors to actualize and use innovation in viable manners to upgrade learning for all understudies. It is basic that these instructors be completely upheld in such manner through satisfactory pre-administration planning, continuous and best in class in-administration exercises, and connections to neighborhood schools and different assets for extra help and learning. Consequently, managers and educators must be considered responsible for the viability of their employments of innovation to help an upgraded learning condition for the instructive network, just as for topic learning for the scope of understudies found in their study halls. In other working environment conditions, as new apparatuses are fused into the work cycle laborers are assessed on their capability in using them. So also, as instructors are instructed how to use innovation to help educating and learning, they ought to be considered responsible for their capacity to do so adequately.>
Innovation fuse in the homeroom is the hypothesis, advancement, usage, the board, and assessment of procedures and assets for learning. Innovation is an expansive term that frequently portrays a control committed to strategies or approaches to make adapting increasingly proficient (Earle, R. S. 2000 ). It is the obligation of every instructor to give an instructive program that suitably underpins every youngster’s learning improvement and learning objectives. In an innovation based society, kids must comprehend and plan to be profitable, autonomous, imaginative, and educated people. Having legitimate access to innovation and having the option to utilize innovation is basic and will be one of the numerous abilities essential for later use in the working environment. Innovation is a vital device that kids use to beneficially complete thoughts, gain information abilities, and take care of issues. Innovation is both adaptable and inherently persuading to youngsters; it is perfect to extending the learning experience. Research on the viability of innovation has concentrated on advanced education, however look into additionally recommends that employments of explicit innovation can improve understudies of all evaluations learning abilities too. Innovation has numerous advantages. Innovation has numerous advantages; it permits understudy simple access to data, it offers an assortment of answers for issues and it has been utilized to improve understudies’ evaluations. Coordinating innovation in the study hall is helpful and enables understudies to be incorporated into society just as furnishing kids with boundless potential outcomes. Be that as it may, numerous teachers accept that acquainting youngsters with innovation is destructive. They accept that innovation supports apathy, can be costly, and that it meddles with youngsters associating with educators and their colleagues. With the goal for innovation to be appropriately utilized in the study hall, teachers must put time and be keen on getting the correct preparing required to have the option to compelling in coordinating innovation and not upsetting kids from appropriately learning. Despite the fact that utilizing innovation in the study hall has been discussed, all inclusive, fusing innovation in the study hall has been advantageous. Innovation tends to singular needs. Understudies need the chances to autonomously investigate complex issues and to develop, to gain from their friends, to reflect of their encounters, and to become mindful pioneers in their very own learning. Innovation prepares instructors and teachers to evaluate and have the option to concentrate on every individual’s understudy qualities and shortcomings. Lee (2002) proposed two methodologies that help instructors to evaluate the youngsters’ capacity to utilize innovation and its advantages on every understudy. First is a dominance learning approach that prompts the responsibility frameworks, which causes instructors to set principles for every understudy as they progress through the school educational program. Second, Lee (2002) recommended that instructors must build up a methodology which evaluates the youngster’s reasoning capacities. The two methodologies help to set a pattern from which teachers fill in as aides and spotlight on the acing aptitudes and information understudies need to meet necessities set out by the instructors to meet roundabout prerequisites. Innovation reconciliation in the homeroom. The company for open telecom (2011) demonstrates that innovation mix in the homerooms happens constantly after some time and pursues a succinct example. At first, educators fuse new bits of innovation into the customary study hall, in the end after some time, they watch changes in the understudy’s commitment among their friends, their conduct, and instructors at that point start to try different things with joining the utilization of innovation in new and progressively suitable manners. Be that as it may, all together for this procedure to be fruitful, it can take around four years or more from the underlying introduction of innovation to changes start to watch (organization for open telecom, 2011). In any case, crosswise over various rates, educators’ innovation utilizes in the study halls may vacillate contingent upon their very own convictions about innovation and the understudy’s general dominance of specific abilities. For instance, on the off chance that instructors have support from the two understudies and the leading body of training, at that point educators will feel increasingly able and secure to coordinate innovation. Generally backing and inspirational desires from the network and the organization will likewise affect educators’ convictions and their ability to incorporate innovation. Innovation in the study hall and its incorporation is a developmental procedure that requires practice. Innovation abilities must expand upon one another and it must co-advance as innovation is presented and acclimatized in the school culture. Innovation and evaluation scores. Lee (2009) analyzed a homeroom that utilized broad utilization of innovation to decide the distinctions on institutionalized appraisal scores among understudies who utilized PCs widely versus the individuals who had restricted PC use. Lee (2009) study found through the act of instructional strategies: 53% of educators utilized PCs as option in contrast to worksheets/exercise manuals, where as 53% of instructors use PCs for exercises, for example, audits, penetrates and rehearses, while 33% utilized PCs to advance community oriented learning(van Braak, Tondeur, &ump; Valcke, 2004; Lee, 2009). Be that as it may, PC instructional strategies changed the teaching method of learning. The investigation additionally discovered understudies’ innovation use into their day by day schedules in many classes was low notwithstanding the choices utilized. Another instructional strategy presented in Lee’s (2009) study is venture based learning. Further, he clarified that undertaking based learning empower students to learn while playing out an errand or movement. Difficulties of joining innovation in instruction. Research by Clark (1992) has indicated that joining innovation in the study hall regularly has numerous hindrances. To begin with, it has demonstrated that the training framework has gotten brought together, test driven, dreary, indifferent, and unimportant to the requesting always changing universe of the youngsters. The centralization denies instructors of the opportunity to arrange showing learning and seriously take an interest in the readiness of schedules or course readings. Additionally, this confiscates the instructors to freely compose getting the hang of as per every kid’s individual learning styles and needs. Lidstone and Stoltman (2006) archived that the absence of well-prepared teachers fills in as an obstruction to cutting edge learning in more than one school. As per them, instructors and approach producers need to accomplish amicability among objectives set out by the educators of the homeroom and the educational plan set out by the school, however so as to accomplish such a sensitive parity, they should put the fundamental devices as a result. Innovation can’t supplant the instructing techniques built up by the schools. Witt (2004) directed research about the effect of innovation on educators’ and understudies’ desires for learning and found that acquainting innovation upsets instructors’ frame of mind with have the option to appropriately educate. So as to understand such a problem, educators must figure out how to utilize innovation in a powerful way and must teach their understudies on the most proficient method to appropriately utilize innovation with the goal that understudies profit by it instead of be upset by it. Innovation and its Effectiveness. The issues engaged with assessing the adequacy of innovation in enlightenment are mind boggling. However innovation, used as an essential instilled actualize, must improve instructing, learning, and accomplishment. Instruction pioneers and policymakers are looked with questions and choices in regards to the usage of innovation. One of the key objectives of the No Child Left Behind Act is to upgrade instruction through innovation, with a particular spotlight on what works I mechanical applications (U.S. Division of Education, 2002a). Relatedly, the updated National Technology Plan (U.S. Branch of Education, 2000) explicitly calls for exact examinations to be directed in schools and homerooms that are intended to figure out which employments of innovation are most effective’under which conditions and with which understudies. Duty of Teachers Administrators and educators ought to get satisfactory, customized, and proceeding with training about how to best incorporate innovation into their schools and courses and ought to be assessed on their capability in doing as such. Overseers and educators are key innovative interfaces in the schools: one is answerable for carrying innovation into the locale or building, the other for carrying it into the study hall. They are likewise significant innovation partners. Fruitful mechanical executions will to a great extent rely on the inspiration, information, and aptitude of executives and instructors to actualize and use innovation in viable manners to upgrade learning for all understudies. It is basic that these instructors be completely upheld in such manner through satisfactory pre-administration planning, continuous and best in class in-administration exercises, and connections to neighborhood schools and different assets for extra help and learning. Consequently, managers and educators must be considered responsible for the viability of their employments of innovation to help an upgraded learning condition for the instructive network, just as for topic learning for the scope of understudies found in their study halls. In other working environment conditions, as new apparatuses are fused into the work cycle laborers are assessed on their capability in using them. So also, as instructors are instructed how to use innovation to help educating and learning, they ought to be considered responsible for their capacity to do so adequately.>
