State-local relationships
Intergovernmental relations at the local level
The specifics and organization for this assignment must include one of the above topics and focus on your city/county/state (Savannah/Chatham/Georgia) and contain the following:
A short description of the problem that includes an overview of the present situation in regard to the problem.
The resources and constraints (for example, social, political, or economic) in dealing with the problem.
Outline and evaluate at least two alternative approaches to resolving the issues and recommend the best course of action to solve the problem.
In any governmental activity, there will be competing interests between and among the various functions. When we refer to intergovernmental relations, it is the result of the Kastnbaum Commission discussed in our readings. The Commission’s focus was centered at the federal level. Our text suggests that as a result of those commission recommendations, there has occurred what is referred to as the unraveling of the cooperative paradigm which has led to the concept of opportunism between and among administrative activities/functions at all levels of government. In that regard, there are often competing bureaucratic subsystems as described in our readings.
You hold the principle administrative office, as described by Weber, in a governmental agency. This can be in a local- or state-level agency. The function that you choose could include, but is not limited to, water, sanitation, health, law enforcement, or any bureaucratic subsystem. You are currently engaged in a debate with the legislature, council/commission, or whatever policy-making board in your community or state. You have discovered that your function is not meeting the desired goals established by the legislative policy. Without more resources, the ability of your function/activity will be unable to even meet minimum standards in the delivery of the service/product. In every political subdivision, there are finite resources; improving your department’s share of those resources will require a sound argument because whatever you are successful in getting will necessarily mean some other activity will get less. Make an argument as to why your budget should be increased over another function of your choice.
Sample Solution
DVCVA 2004 intently connects the common and criminal procedures through new police powers, and through another criminal offense of break of a non-attack request. It likewise makes another offense of causing or allowing the passing of a kid or powerless individual. It likewise requires the reception of a code of training and an unfortunate casualties’ store, to be financed by extra charges on fines and some fixed punishments. It makes the influence for the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority to recuperate cash from guilty parties, and makes an assortment of different changes to criminal method, controls and condemning. Non-attack or occupation orders are key apparatuses in giving assurance to the individuals who fall inside the classification of “related people”. Preceding the establishment of the DVCVA 2004 qualification stretched out to those living respectively as man and spouse (“companions”), or previous companions, and the individuals who live or have lived in a similar family unit (with the exception of on the off chance that they are workers, occupants or visitors, or a tenant). DVCVA 2004 broadens the class of “related individual” to incorporate companions in an equivalent sex relationship living in an equal relationship to that of a couple. The ability to connect an intensity of capture to a non-attack request is expelled by this demonstration. Rather, basic ambush turns into an arrestable offense under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 and break of a non-attack request turns into a criminal (arrestable) offense. In the event that, for reasons unknown, no indictment is mounted, maybe as a result of the desires of the person in question, that does not counteract an application to the common court to submit for rupture of the request. Nothing avoids the initiation of common procedures while criminal procedures are pending, after capture, however apparently a family court ought to anticipate the assurance of the criminal procedure. Another criminal offense is made under s42A will be culpable on conviction on prosecution by a term of detainment not surpassing five years, or a fine, or both, and on rundown conviction by a term of detainment not surpassing a year, or a fine not surpassing the statutory least, or both. The arraignment should demonstrate the presence and terms of the request; the way that the litigant knew about the request; direct that adds up to break of that request, gave the rupture is pertinent just to sentence and not to blame or guiltlessness; and the absence of sensible reason.>
DVCVA 2004 intently connects the common and criminal procedures through new police powers, and through another criminal offense of break of a non-attack request. It likewise makes another offense of causing or allowing the passing of a kid or powerless individual. It likewise requires the reception of a code of training and an unfortunate casualties’ store, to be financed by extra charges on fines and some fixed punishments. It makes the influence for the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority to recuperate cash from guilty parties, and makes an assortment of different changes to criminal method, controls and condemning. Non-attack or occupation orders are key apparatuses in giving assurance to the individuals who fall inside the classification of “related people”. Preceding the establishment of the DVCVA 2004 qualification stretched out to those living respectively as man and spouse (“companions”), or previous companions, and the individuals who live or have lived in a similar family unit (with the exception of on the off chance that they are workers, occupants or visitors, or a tenant). DVCVA 2004 broadens the class of “related individual” to incorporate companions in an equivalent sex relationship living in an equal relationship to that of a couple. The ability to connect an intensity of capture to a non-attack request is expelled by this demonstration. Rather, basic ambush turns into an arrestable offense under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 and break of a non-attack request turns into a criminal (arrestable) offense. In the event that, for reasons unknown, no indictment is mounted, maybe as a result of the desires of the person in question, that does not counteract an application to the common court to submit for rupture of the request. Nothing avoids the initiation of common procedures while criminal procedures are pending, after capture, however apparently a family court ought to anticipate the assurance of the criminal procedure. Another criminal offense is made under s42A will be culpable on conviction on prosecution by a term of detainment not surpassing five years, or a fine, or both, and on rundown conviction by a term of detainment not surpassing a year, or a fine not surpassing the statutory least, or both. The arraignment should demonstrate the presence and terms of the request; the way that the litigant knew about the request; direct that adds up to break of that request, gave the rupture is pertinent just to sentence and not to blame or guiltlessness; and the absence of sensible reason.>
