Dilemma 1: Young child both in urban and rural areas, using contraceptive implant to decrease the risk of pregnancy (sometimes after parentâs consent) but getting tested STI positive for having unprotected sex. Parents not aware of sexually transmitted diseases.
Dilemma 2: Parents leaving (e.g.13 or 14 y/o) older child to supervise younger children (e.g.8 or 9 y/o) in the house.
Dilemma 3: a 15 y/o girl was staying in the house of auntie (mumâs sister) while the mum was in the hospital ICU. A child sex offender (also mumâs new partner) was visiting the house of auntie at night with few other people (drinking and smoking the night away). Child protection taskforce had sexual harm concern as the sex offender was visiting the house where the 15 y/o was staying. The taskforce was trying to remove the child from that house to a safer place. But the child sex offender was on the loose and the police was only looking for him during the day time, not at night (even after police had information that he visits the house at night). The case was a priority too.
Reflect on your use of a specific social work intervention –
Discuss the alignment between your values and the organisations â
Dignity and worth of individual, Non-judgemental, no assumptions, professional
Sample Solution
curious approximately the character of this mismatch. My angle, then, is to regard improvement help for instance of outside intervention into nearby settings. at some stage in the changes of technique, useful resource has remained a count number of introducing new functions. introduced in from outside are fabric resources, technical knowledge, financial policies, political structures etc, along side attached norms and values. Such creation inevitably implies interference in present systems with the plain, although regularly non-articulated, intention of changing or changing prevailing functions and thereby attaining positive societal change. on this study, i’m able to investigate how interventionist rationales relate to the specifics and dynamics of a neighborhood placing at implementation. The studies hassle is formulated accordingly: how powerful is software of resource to the improvement of the recipient u . s .? the first bankruptcy of this thesis includes a quick advent at the specifics of improvement aid and a heritage on eu’s Cooperation with Nigeria. After that, chapters follow that each solutions part of the studies question from a Disciplinary factor of view. chapter two seems at the moral case for useful resource and gives an overview of several theories that designate why aid giving is useless. chapter 3 makes a speciality of why aid is given and is split in components: the first one seems at institutional resource-giving, whereas the second one has the recipient on the core of its argumentation. The fourth chapter places together all the facts and looks for conflicts between them. After the conflicts are resolved, chapter 5 in the end gives an integrative solution to the question what the motives are behind development resource. the realization discusses the results of this studies and proposes thoughts for future studies. Defining improvement aid resource comes in many bureaucracy, is given via many donors and distributed to loads of recipients. This makes defining improvement useful resource a difficult venture. relying at the definition used, some useful resource flows are protected in one evaluation and excluded in some other. terms like official Developmental aid, reputable useful resource, development resource, foreign resource, Humanitarian useful resource can all check with the same concept or one just slightly one of a kind. quite often they’re used interchangeable, further complicating a proper evaluation. looking to address the hassle of defining resource, Riddell has given an overview of the maximum not unusual phrases and they are distinctive meaning. overseas resource is the broadest term and Riddell defines it as ‘all resources ransferred by way of donors to recipients’ (Riddell, 2008: 17). As Riddell points out, this time period does not say whatever approximately who the donors or the recipients are, the motives at the back of the switch and whether the transaction is voluntarily or not. development useful resource further narrows this down, because it consists of the a part of overseas resource that is going from rich to poor international locations, ambitions to lessen poverty and focuses on human welfare and development (Riddell, 2008: 17). The term legit improvement resource [ODA] turned into first utilized by the development help Committee [DAC] of the business enterprise for financial Co-operation and improvement [OECD] and is to be visible one of a kind from legitimate resource [OA]. genuinely put, the distinction among the 2 lies within the recipients of the aid: resource going to the poorest growing nations or the lower and upper center-earnings international locations is called ODA, whereas OA is aid centered at more ‘superior growing countries and nations and territories in transition’ (Riddell, 2008: 18). Arguably the motives for giving resource to a country with a population dwelling in extreme poverty can be different from the ones for giving resource to a rustic with an economy this is already starting to develop at a quick rate. due to the fact that maximum resources do now not specify what shape of useful resource they’re discussing, the picture here will no longer be as special as preferred and some generalizations have to be made with a purpose to draw any end at all. From here on, the time period improvement useful resource may be used with its definition as proposed via Riddell, unless said in any other case. improvement useful resource is shipped thru numerous forms of donors. Bilateral aid is ODA given from the government of 1 donor us of a to the authorities of a recipient usa (Riddell, 2008 :). Multilateral resource is ODA distributed through an global corporation, inclusive of the distinctive bodies of the United nations [UN] (Riddell, 2008 :). Non-governmental companies [NGOs] have become an increasing number of important as a participant inside the discipline of development useful resource (Riddell, 2008 :). NGOs may be locally primarily based or acting on a international stage and are based in both donor and recipient countries (Riddell, 2>
curious approximately the character of this mismatch. My angle, then, is to regard improvement help for instance of outside intervention into nearby settings. at some stage in the changes of technique, useful resource has remained a count number of introducing new functions. introduced in from outside are fabric resources, technical knowledge, financial policies, political structures etc, along side attached norms and values. Such creation inevitably implies interference in present systems with the plain, although regularly non-articulated, intention of changing or changing prevailing functions and thereby attaining positive societal change. on this study, i’m able to investigate how interventionist rationales relate to the specifics and dynamics of a neighborhood placing at implementation. The studies hassle is formulated accordingly: how powerful is software of resource to the improvement of the recipient u . s .? the first bankruptcy of this thesis includes a quick advent at the specifics of improvement aid and a heritage on eu’s Cooperation with Nigeria. After that, chapters follow that each solutions part of the studies question from a Disciplinary factor of view. chapter two seems at the moral case for useful resource and gives an overview of several theories that designate why aid giving is useless. chapter 3 makes a speciality of why aid is given and is split in components: the first one seems at institutional resource-giving, whereas the second one has the recipient on the core of its argumentation. The fourth chapter places together all the facts and looks for conflicts between them. After the conflicts are resolved, chapter 5 in the end gives an integrative solution to the question what the motives are behind development resource. the realization discusses the results of this studies and proposes thoughts for future studies. Defining improvement aid resource comes in many bureaucracy, is given via many donors and distributed to loads of recipients. This makes defining improvement useful resource a difficult venture. relying at the definition used, some useful resource flows are protected in one evaluation and excluded in some other. terms like official Developmental aid, reputable useful resource, development resource, foreign resource, Humanitarian useful resource can all check with the same concept or one just slightly one of a kind. quite often they’re used interchangeable, further complicating a proper evaluation. looking to address the hassle of defining resource, Riddell has given an overview of the maximum not unusual phrases and they are distinctive meaning. overseas resource is the broadest term and Riddell defines it as ‘all resources ransferred by way of donors to recipients’ (Riddell, 2008: 17). As Riddell points out, this time period does not say whatever approximately who the donors or the recipients are, the motives at the back of the switch and whether the transaction is voluntarily or not. development useful resource further narrows this down, because it consists of the a part of overseas resource that is going from rich to poor international locations, ambitions to lessen poverty and focuses on human welfare and development (Riddell, 2008: 17). The term legit improvement resource [ODA] turned into first utilized by the development help Committee [DAC] of the business enterprise for financial Co-operation and improvement [OECD] and is to be visible one of a kind from legitimate resource [OA]. genuinely put, the distinction among the 2 lies within the recipients of the aid: resource going to the poorest growing nations or the lower and upper center-earnings international locations is called ODA, whereas OA is aid centered at more ‘superior growing countries and nations and territories in transition’ (Riddell, 2008: 18). Arguably the motives for giving resource to a country with a population dwelling in extreme poverty can be different from the ones for giving resource to a rustic with an economy this is already starting to develop at a quick rate. due to the fact that maximum resources do now not specify what shape of useful resource they’re discussing, the picture here will no longer be as special as preferred and some generalizations have to be made with a purpose to draw any end at all. From here on, the time period improvement useful resource may be used with its definition as proposed via Riddell, unless said in any other case. improvement useful resource is shipped thru numerous forms of donors. Bilateral aid is ODA given from the government of 1 donor us of a to the authorities of a recipient usa (Riddell, 2008 :). Multilateral resource is ODA distributed through an global corporation, inclusive of the distinctive bodies of the United nations [UN] (Riddell, 2008 :). Non-governmental companies [NGOs] have become an increasing number of important as a participant inside the discipline of development useful resource (Riddell, 2008 :). NGOs may be locally primarily based or acting on a international stage and are based in both donor and recipient countries (Riddell, 2>
