I’m working on a philosophy multi-part question and need a sample draft to help me understand better.
- What is the range of signs presented?
- What is the relation between words and signs?
- What is the signifier and the signified?
- What is FDS’s “world-changing” claim?
- What is the origin of language on the account that FDS is challenging?
- How does FDS’s critique of this view of the origin of language relate to Nietzsche’s account of the origin of truth and lie in a nonmoral sense?
- What is the importance of structure and syntax as it relates to meaningfulness?
- What is structural linguistics and what is its range or the range of structural signs?
- What is the relation between structuralism and subjectivity and self-identity? And how does this relate to the prevalence of the notion of “narrative”?
- How is the matter of social-constructivism related to structuralism and the changing understanding of history and how history is told?
- How does structuralism challenge western philosophy’s basic epistemological structure and the very notion of objectivity?
- How does structuralism challenge existentialism? (Can we understand those parameters into which we are born if the structure or super structure itself contains biases to which we inevitably remain blind?)
