What were the issues to be decided by the judges in the case of Riggs v. Palmer? What arguments did the Majority judges make to support their decision? What arguments did the Dissenting judge make to support his decision? How did each of the Majority and Dissenting judges view the judgeâs role of interpretation? What connections can be drawn between the judgesâ reasoning and philosophical/ legal theories covered during the course?
Which of the two positions (i.e., either the majority or the dissenting judges) makes the strongest, and most persuasive case, and why? Be sure to provide argumentation in support of your position.
Sample Solution
On January 27, 2017, President Trump signed an government order banning citizens from Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Iran, Sudan, Yemen and Iran from getting into america. Immigration from these nations became briefly suspended as nicely. This posed a huge problem for the yankee humans as they believed that this type of ban was a blatant act of discrimination and became in violation of the primary change. The President claimed that this order become a plan to save you Islamic terrorists from coming into the us. Refugees from these Muslim international locations have been given non secular checks, whilst Christians and other non-Muslim religions were granted priority access. The order would suspend entry into the us for a hundred and twenty days till it changed into decided that those detained did now not pose a threat to america. almost right now, protests erupted everywhere in the u . s . a ., aggressively objecting to the order. Human rights activists rallied to condemn President Trumps order, insisting that it turned into discrimination in clean form, however disguised to seem like he become attempting to make america more secure. maximum of those affected had been girls, children as well as guys attempting to flee from violence of their u . s . to the safety of the usa. sooner or later after the executive order become signed, a judge in the big apple city temporarily blocked part of the order siting that it was in violation of the charter. a day after that every other judge blocked an additional part of the order trying to restore the rights of the human beings. On February fifth, 2017 the ban was now not renewed by means of the government. in keeping with the regulation, the order is unlawful. Over 50 years in the past, there had been legal guidelines created to prevent discrimination towards immigrants primarily based on national starting place. The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 was created mainly for that reason. This become accomplished inside the overdue nineteenth century. legal guidelines existed excluding all Asian and jap humans in what became referred to as the Asiatic Barred zone, as well as eastern Europeans and Africans from immigration quotas which could benefit Western Europeans. It seemed as even though President Trump turned into trying to recreate a new edition of the Asiatic barred quarter, the usage of an govt order. He also claimed that he turned into flawlessly in his rights to discriminate, looking at a 1952 law that indicates the proper of the President to temporarily deny entry to people he unearths do not have the nice interest of america at heart. but, this regulation was constrained through Congress in 1965 blatantly mentioning that no character may be âdiscriminated against inside the issuance of an immigrant visa due to the personâs race, sex, nationality, area of beginning or region of house.â The simplest exceptions are those furnished for by means of Congress. (Bier, 2017)>
On January 27, 2017, President Trump signed an government order banning citizens from Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Iran, Sudan, Yemen and Iran from getting into america. Immigration from these nations became briefly suspended as nicely. This posed a huge problem for the yankee humans as they believed that this type of ban was a blatant act of discrimination and became in violation of the primary change. The President claimed that this order become a plan to save you Islamic terrorists from coming into the us. Refugees from these Muslim international locations have been given non secular checks, whilst Christians and other non-Muslim religions were granted priority access. The order would suspend entry into the us for a hundred and twenty days till it changed into decided that those detained did now not pose a threat to america. almost right now, protests erupted everywhere in the u . s . a ., aggressively objecting to the order. Human rights activists rallied to condemn President Trumps order, insisting that it turned into discrimination in clean form, however disguised to seem like he become attempting to make america more secure. maximum of those affected had been girls, children as well as guys attempting to flee from violence of their u . s . to the safety of the usa. sooner or later after the executive order become signed, a judge in the big apple city temporarily blocked part of the order siting that it was in violation of the charter. a day after that every other judge blocked an additional part of the order trying to restore the rights of the human beings. On February fifth, 2017 the ban was now not renewed by means of the government. in keeping with the regulation, the order is unlawful. Over 50 years in the past, there had been legal guidelines created to prevent discrimination towards immigrants primarily based on national starting place. The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 was created mainly for that reason. This become accomplished inside the overdue nineteenth century. legal guidelines existed excluding all Asian and jap humans in what became referred to as the Asiatic Barred zone, as well as eastern Europeans and Africans from immigration quotas which could benefit Western Europeans. It seemed as even though President Trump turned into trying to recreate a new edition of the Asiatic barred quarter, the usage of an govt order. He also claimed that he turned into flawlessly in his rights to discriminate, looking at a 1952 law that indicates the proper of the President to temporarily deny entry to people he unearths do not have the nice interest of america at heart. but, this regulation was constrained through Congress in 1965 blatantly mentioning that no character may be âdiscriminated against inside the issuance of an immigrant visa due to the personâs race, sex, nationality, area of beginning or region of house.â The simplest exceptions are those furnished for by means of Congress. (Bier, 2017)>
