Satrapi, Marjane. Persepolis: The Story of a Childhood. Pantheon, 2004.
Post an entry discussing your response to Marjane Satrapi’s Persepolis. Focusing on the theme of travel, analyze one or two key scenes depicting travel or cross-cultural encounter. Explain its significance for our understanding of the film as a whole.
Discussion board assignments have two parts:
Post your initial response to the discussion topic or question. Each post should be 300-500 words and, ideally, will offer a detailed analysis or commentary on some aspect of the text. Respond in one of the following to ways:
Cite a provocative sentence from the text, and then analyze it. Discuss what is compelling, or interesting about it, and analyze its language, its imagery, and significance in terms of the larger thematic concern of travel.
Focus on once scene or thesis in the text and describe what is happening in it, how it connects to an important issue or problem, and why it is significant.
Sample Solution
Sepsis is a horrible disease with poor effects. expertise the best popularity tool and control are key to surviving sepsis. the overall articles bring collective facts on improving sepsis recognition and decreasing door-to-antibiotic time. The research described variety from degree III to degree VI in keeping with Melnyk and Fineout-Overholtâs (2015) level of evidence guide. Having meta-evaluation, randomized manipulate trials, or maybe well-designed controlled trials with out randomization would increase the validity of the consequences. As formerly stated, training is found effective in growing expertise and popularity on sepsis care. implementing an academic application on sepsis reputation and care is clinically big to improve sepsis outcomes. schooling need to be integrated right into a sepsis care package to improve compliance and sepsis popularity. moreover, if qSOFA or sofa have been used after SIRS standards to decide critical care popularity this would boom outcomes and offer information on affected person consequences. the general proof in the studies is not enough to make changes in medical practice. There isn’t always enough collective power of proof to make a change in medical practice. but, the articles did guide SIRS criteria for greatest sensitivity to sepsis reputation with qSOFA displaying better sensitivity to mortality. The resources of proof assist the persevering with use of SIRS standards for a sepsis triage screening device. recognizing sepsis and decreasing limitations are key to improving antibiotic administration. The results of the examine showed the significance of schooling and decreasing obstacles to enhancing sepsis recognition and management. in step with the evidence, SIRS criteria is offering higher popularity for sepsis. The proof ends in septic patients benefiting from an extra screening tool, the qSOFA, if they have 2+ SIRS standards to rule out better mortality and essential care needs. in addition evidence is wanted on qSOFA replacing SIRS for sepsis identification previous to imposing within the medical putting. It seems most evidence carried out is from retrospective studies. Randomized control trials or meta-evaluation could reinforce this declare for SIRS over qSOFA in emergency branch triage screening device for sepsis popularity.>
Sepsis is a horrible disease with poor effects. expertise the best popularity tool and control are key to surviving sepsis. the overall articles bring collective facts on improving sepsis recognition and decreasing door-to-antibiotic time. The research described variety from degree III to degree VI in keeping with Melnyk and Fineout-Overholtâs (2015) level of evidence guide. Having meta-evaluation, randomized manipulate trials, or maybe well-designed controlled trials with out randomization would increase the validity of the consequences. As formerly stated, training is found effective in growing expertise and popularity on sepsis care. implementing an academic application on sepsis reputation and care is clinically big to improve sepsis outcomes. schooling need to be integrated right into a sepsis care package to improve compliance and sepsis popularity. moreover, if qSOFA or sofa have been used after SIRS standards to decide critical care popularity this would boom outcomes and offer information on affected person consequences. the general proof in the studies is not enough to make changes in medical practice. There isn’t always enough collective power of proof to make a change in medical practice. but, the articles did guide SIRS criteria for greatest sensitivity to sepsis reputation with qSOFA displaying better sensitivity to mortality. The resources of proof assist the persevering with use of SIRS standards for a sepsis triage screening device. recognizing sepsis and decreasing limitations are key to improving antibiotic administration. The results of the examine showed the significance of schooling and decreasing obstacles to enhancing sepsis recognition and management. in step with the evidence, SIRS criteria is offering higher popularity for sepsis. The proof ends in septic patients benefiting from an extra screening tool, the qSOFA, if they have 2+ SIRS standards to rule out better mortality and essential care needs. in addition evidence is wanted on qSOFA replacing SIRS for sepsis identification previous to imposing within the medical putting. It seems most evidence carried out is from retrospective studies. Randomized control trials or meta-evaluation could reinforce this declare for SIRS over qSOFA in emergency branch triage screening device for sepsis popularity.>
