Write an essay. Start by identifying all three of your representatives. Then, pick the representative you are most interested in and explain why they interest you. Present the information you found in your research required above in the essay.
Sample Solution
post FTC enforcement and private litigation, and on the corresponding deterrent value of such enforcement and litigation, than on detailed prohibitions and rules. This system helps avoid imposing costly and draconian compliance mandates on entities which are not a priori threats to personal privacy, such as personal blogs, small businesses, and informational websites. The FTCâs approach seeks to allocate scarce regulatory resources to prevent the greatest threats to online privacy. To clarify, if a small entity behaves in an unfair or deceptive way, it can be prosecuted, but the FTC does not presume that every entity wants to harm online users. Several additional laws form the foundation on which the FTC carries out its charge: the Privacy Act of 1974, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, and the Childrenâs Online Privacy Protection Act. The American conception of privacy is predicated on ensuring the individualâs freedom from government intrusion and pushing back the growth of the administrative state. The framersâ distaste for excessive government power to invade the privacy of the people was forged into the Bill of Rights in the Third, Fourth, and Fifth Amendments. These amendments responded to the egregious British abuses of personal privacy; including the quartering of soldiers in private homes, the search and seizure of colonistsâ property, and forcing colonists to divulge information. Some of the first laws in the new republic constrained the governmentâs use of the census and its ability to compel information in court. The 1966 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) ensured that people could access records held by the government. Given this history of pushing back against government intrusion, it is reasonable to be skeptical that increasing government power is now the key to privacy in the U.S.>
post FTC enforcement and private litigation, and on the corresponding deterrent value of such enforcement and litigation, than on detailed prohibitions and rules. This system helps avoid imposing costly and draconian compliance mandates on entities which are not a priori threats to personal privacy, such as personal blogs, small businesses, and informational websites. The FTCâs approach seeks to allocate scarce regulatory resources to prevent the greatest threats to online privacy. To clarify, if a small entity behaves in an unfair or deceptive way, it can be prosecuted, but the FTC does not presume that every entity wants to harm online users. Several additional laws form the foundation on which the FTC carries out its charge: the Privacy Act of 1974, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, and the Childrenâs Online Privacy Protection Act. The American conception of privacy is predicated on ensuring the individualâs freedom from government intrusion and pushing back the growth of the administrative state. The framersâ distaste for excessive government power to invade the privacy of the people was forged into the Bill of Rights in the Third, Fourth, and Fifth Amendments. These amendments responded to the egregious British abuses of personal privacy; including the quartering of soldiers in private homes, the search and seizure of colonistsâ property, and forcing colonists to divulge information. Some of the first laws in the new republic constrained the governmentâs use of the census and its ability to compel information in court. The 1966 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) ensured that people could access records held by the government. Given this history of pushing back against government intrusion, it is reasonable to be skeptical that increasing government power is now the key to privacy in the U.S.>
