Choose 5 principles of Catholic Social Thought (CST),
1) state, define and describe these coherently; and
2) explain what each reveals about the interrelationship between âselfâ and âcommunityâ.
What are you being assessed on?
Assessment No.1 is designed to assess the first intended learning outcome:
- Describe coherently in writing the principles of Catholic Social Thought (CST), and through a personal written commentary, explain that the concepts of âselfâ and âcommunityâ are interrelated.
Construct a feature article stating, defining and describing, in writing, 3-5 principles of Catholic Social Thought (CST) as outlined in the unit; explain the inter-relationship between âselfâ and âcommunityâ (with reference to 3-5 principles of Catholic Social Thought that you have chosen)
⢠The 3-5 should be chosen from these nine principles: Dignity of the Human Person; Common Good; Preferential Option for the Poor; Subsidiarity; Universal Purpose of Goods; Stewardship of Creation; Promotion of Peace; Participation; Globalsolidarity.
Sample Solution
This paper will look at about selling human rights in Russia by means of assisting NGOs. in my view, there are three strategy of ecu Union (ecu) to promote human rights in Russia which include tracking and reporting human rights situations, convey human rights NGOs into ecu-Russia human right dialogue and spend massive monetary assets. The define for this paper included advent, historical past of the Russian human rights NGOs, theoretical framework the use of in this paper is liberalism technique, strategies of ecu to sell human rights in Russia and conclusion. in the current many years, variety of the NGOs in Russia has growing unexpectedly. Russia is the 1/3 largest buying and selling accomplice of the ecu and the monetary elements have play a dominant function in figuring out the eu’s human rights regulations vis-??-vis Russia. In 2001, Russia was domestic to about about 19,500 human rights NGOs which constituted about five% of all registered NGOs. The human rights movement has experienced fast geographical expansion even as for the duration of the whole Soviet period the movement changed into almost completely concentrated inside the Moscow and the human rights NGOs function in all 89 areas of the Russian Federation. in view that 2005, the ecu and Russia have held twice-every year consultations on human rights. On 17 November 2010, the present day round of the session on human rights become held. the european turned into raising the variety of worries which relate to the precise human rights troubles within the Russian Federation. It changed into encompass the problem concerning freedom of speech and meeting, prison conditions and unwell treatment with the aid of regulation enforcement organizations and impunity. besides that, Russian human rights NGOs are drastically numerous in length, structure and coverage ambit. consequently, they set the schedule, set up standards, monitor and propose enforcement, and act as aid and schooling groups inside the discipline of human rights. but, it does now not have interaction many Russian. that is because the project has contributed to this situation including many Russian human rights NGOs lack cautiously designed rules of strategic interplay with the public and media. NGO screw ups of public communique also can give an explanation for through one among their hard normative context. Russian perceives human rights in phrases of 3 awesome normative dimensions which include civil liberties, financial rights and individual rights. one of the demanding situations confronted by Russian human rights NGO is a resistant home normative context. constructing cooperative engagements with the government and setting up themselves in country-ruled coverage networks is another mission for the Russian human rights NGOs. In fashionable, mechanisms and practices amongst human rights NGOs in Russia is an important characteristic of the Russian human rights NGO network. this is due to its excessive involvement in diverse national and transnational knowledge, advocacy and coverage based networks. furthermore, interplay among human rights NGOs at both Russian and eu level has created forums in which the facts is transmitted and knowledge is shared. however, I would really like to apply the liberalism approach to relate this topic. that is because liberalism is a political and social philosophy advocating individual freedom, representational forms of authorities, development and reform and protection of civil liberties. ecu coverage presupposes the life of non-kingdom actors who can be encouraged to pressure governments to comply to human rights norms. nation actors act rationally to pursue strategic interests. but, it recognizes that choices at european stage should meet the interaction among actors. First approach of ecu Union (european) to promote human rights in Russia is tracking and reporting human rights situations. european practice of monitoring and reporting human rights situations inside the 1/3 international locations. It entails the essential statistics sharing between european establishments and the neighborhood human rights NGOs. Russian NGOs emerge as an vital source of statistics and information regarding the human rights scenario inside the Russian Federation. this is because of the statistics which give with the aid of NGOs is used to prepare european project annual human rights fact sheet, european Annual Human Rights Rep>
This paper will look at about selling human rights in Russia by means of assisting NGOs. in my view, there are three strategy of ecu Union (ecu) to promote human rights in Russia which include tracking and reporting human rights situations, convey human rights NGOs into ecu-Russia human right dialogue and spend massive monetary assets. The define for this paper included advent, historical past of the Russian human rights NGOs, theoretical framework the use of in this paper is liberalism technique, strategies of ecu to sell human rights in Russia and conclusion. in the current many years, variety of the NGOs in Russia has growing unexpectedly. Russia is the 1/3 largest buying and selling accomplice of the ecu and the monetary elements have play a dominant function in figuring out the eu’s human rights regulations vis-??-vis Russia. In 2001, Russia was domestic to about about 19,500 human rights NGOs which constituted about five% of all registered NGOs. The human rights movement has experienced fast geographical expansion even as for the duration of the whole Soviet period the movement changed into almost completely concentrated inside the Moscow and the human rights NGOs function in all 89 areas of the Russian Federation. in view that 2005, the ecu and Russia have held twice-every year consultations on human rights. On 17 November 2010, the present day round of the session on human rights become held. the european turned into raising the variety of worries which relate to the precise human rights troubles within the Russian Federation. It changed into encompass the problem concerning freedom of speech and meeting, prison conditions and unwell treatment with the aid of regulation enforcement organizations and impunity. besides that, Russian human rights NGOs are drastically numerous in length, structure and coverage ambit. consequently, they set the schedule, set up standards, monitor and propose enforcement, and act as aid and schooling groups inside the discipline of human rights. but, it does now not have interaction many Russian. that is because the project has contributed to this situation including many Russian human rights NGOs lack cautiously designed rules of strategic interplay with the public and media. NGO screw ups of public communique also can give an explanation for through one among their hard normative context. Russian perceives human rights in phrases of 3 awesome normative dimensions which include civil liberties, financial rights and individual rights. one of the demanding situations confronted by Russian human rights NGO is a resistant home normative context. constructing cooperative engagements with the government and setting up themselves in country-ruled coverage networks is another mission for the Russian human rights NGOs. In fashionable, mechanisms and practices amongst human rights NGOs in Russia is an important characteristic of the Russian human rights NGO network. this is due to its excessive involvement in diverse national and transnational knowledge, advocacy and coverage based networks. furthermore, interplay among human rights NGOs at both Russian and eu level has created forums in which the facts is transmitted and knowledge is shared. however, I would really like to apply the liberalism approach to relate this topic. that is because liberalism is a political and social philosophy advocating individual freedom, representational forms of authorities, development and reform and protection of civil liberties. ecu coverage presupposes the life of non-kingdom actors who can be encouraged to pressure governments to comply to human rights norms. nation actors act rationally to pursue strategic interests. but, it recognizes that choices at european stage should meet the interaction among actors. First approach of ecu Union (european) to promote human rights in Russia is tracking and reporting human rights situations. european practice of monitoring and reporting human rights situations inside the 1/3 international locations. It entails the essential statistics sharing between european establishments and the neighborhood human rights NGOs. Russian NGOs emerge as an vital source of statistics and information regarding the human rights scenario inside the Russian Federation. this is because of the statistics which give with the aid of NGOs is used to prepare european project annual human rights fact sheet, european Annual Human Rights Rep>
