Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion rowThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements _1883
view longer description
Range
threshold: pts
Edit ratingDelete rating50.0 to >40.0 pts
Meets Expectation
The Portfolio includes all four of the required components, as specified in the assignment including the Mindmap, Written Speech, Slide Presentation, and Video Recording.
_4372
Edit ratingDelete rating40.0 to >30.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
The Portfolio includes three of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
_8938
Edit ratingDelete rating30.0 to >20.0 pts
Below Expectation
The Portfolio includes two of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
_7434
Edit ratingDelete rating20.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
The Portfolio includes one or less of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
_4380
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts/ 50.0 pts
—
Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion rowThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent – Mindmap _9152
view longer description
Range
threshold: pts
Edit ratingDelete rating30.0 to >24.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Mindmap demonstrates strong knowledge of five module topics, as specified in the assignment.
_647
Edit ratingDelete rating24.0 to >18.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Mindmap demonstrates adequate knowledge of three-four module topics, as specified in the assignment.
_9538
Edit ratingDelete rating18.0 to >12.0 pts
Below Expectation
Mindmap demonstrates fair knowledge of two-three module topics, as specified in the assignment.
_1140
Edit ratingDelete rating12.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Mindmap fails to demonstrate fair knowledge of the module topics, as specified in the assignment.
_6694
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts/ 30.0 pts
—
Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion rowThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis and Evaluation – Written Speech _1306
view longer description
Range
threshold: pts
Edit ratingDelete rating50.0 to >40.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Written Speech demonstrates strong synthesis and evaluation of five module topics outlined in mindmap, as specified in the assignment.
_6760
Edit ratingDelete rating40.0 to >30.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Written Speech demonstrates adequate synthesis and evaluation of three-four module topics outlined in mindmap, as specified in the assignment.
_9070
Edit ratingDelete rating30.0 to >20.0 pts
Below Expectation
Written Speech demonstrates fair synthesis and evaluation of two-three module topics outlined in mindmap, as specified in the assignment.
_4657
Edit ratingDelete rating20.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Written Speech fails to demonstrate fair synthesis and evaluation of the module topics outlined in the mindmap, as specified in the assignment.
_1251
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts/ 50.0 pts
—
Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion rowThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis and Evaluation – Slide Presentation _9501
view longer description
Range
threshold: pts
Edit ratingDelete rating50.0 to >40.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Slide Presentation demonstrates strong synthesis and evaluation of five module topics outlined in mindmap, as specified in the assignment.
_3258
Edit ratingDelete rating40.0 to >30.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Slide Presentation demonstrates adequate synthesis and evaluation of three-four module topics outlined in mindmap, as specified in the assignment.
_8654
Edit ratingDelete rating30.0 to >20.0 pts
Below Expectation
Slide Presentation demonstrates fair synthesis and evaluation of two-three module topics outlined in mindmap, as specified in the assignment.
_5380
Edit ratingDelete rating20.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Slide Presentation fails to demonstrate fair synthesis and evaluation of the module topics outlined in the mindmap, as specified in the assignment.
_1508
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts/ 50.0 pts
—
Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion rowThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis and Evaluation – Video Recording _7226
view longer description
Range
threshold: pts
Edit ratingDelete rating50.0 to >40.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Video Recording demonstrates strong synthesis and evaluation of five module topics outlined in mindmap, as specified in the assignment.
_2654
Edit ratingDelete rating40.0 to >30.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Video Recording demonstrates adequate synthesis and evaluation of three-four module topics outlined in mindmap, as specified in the assignment.
_3197
Edit ratingDelete rating30.0 to >20.0 pts
Below Expectation
Video Recording demonstrates fair synthesis and evaluation of two-three module topics outlined in mindmap, as specified in the assignment.
_9376
Edit ratingDelete rating20.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Video Recording fails to demonstrate fair synthesis and evaluation of the module topics outlined in the mindmap, as specified in the assignment.
_5696
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts/ 50.0 pts
—
Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion rowThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources – Choice and Integration _112
view longer description
Range
threshold: pts
Edit ratingDelete rating40.0 to >32.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Cites and integrates at least five credible sources in Written Speech and Slide Presentation, as specified in the assignment.
_7986
Edit ratingDelete rating32.0 to >24.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Cites and integrates at least four credible sources in Written Speech and Slide Presentation, as specified in the assignment.
_8888
Edit ratingDelete rating24.0 to >16.0 pts
Below Expectation
Cites and integrates at least three credible sources in Written Speech and Slide Presentation, as specified in the assignment.
_6952
Edit ratingDelete rating16.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Cites and integrates less than three credible sources in Written Speech and Slide Presentation, as specified in the assignment.
_507
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts/ 40.0 pts
—
Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion rowThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization _7796
view longer description
Range
threshold: pts
Edit ratingDelete rating30.0 to >24.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format. Conforms to project requirements for each of the four components, as specified in the assignment.
_1898
Edit ratingDelete rating24.0 to >18.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Project is organized, adequately written, and in proper format. Conforms to most of the project requirements, as specified in the assignment.
_6743
Edit ratingDelete rating18.0 to >12.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major problems in organization and writing; does not completely follow proper format. In a significant way does not conform to project requirements, as specified in the assignment.
_8219
Edit ratingDelete rating12.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Project is not well organized or well written and is not in proper format. Does not conform to project requirements, as specified in the assignment.
_5988
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts/ 30.0 pts
—
Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion rowThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and Style _6466
view longer description
Range
threshold: pts
Edit ratingDelete rating20.0 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few or no minor errors in grammar and spelling; appropriate writing style; clear and concise with no unsupported comments.
_3812
Edit ratingDelete rating16.0 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Small number of significant but not major errors in grammar and spelling; generally appropriate writing.
_8928
Edit ratingDelete rating12.0 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; work needed on grammar and spelling; does not meet program expectations.
_4573
Edit ratingDelete rating8.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Poor quality; unacceptable in terms of grammar and/or spelling; inappropriate writing style that interferes with clarity.
_2139
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts/ 20.0 pts
—
Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion rowThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style _3947
view longer description
Range
threshold: pts
Edit ratingDelete rating30.0 to >24.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA, with no more than one significant error.
_6792
Edit ratingDelete rating24.0 to >18.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.
_9252
Edit ratingDelete rating18.0 to >12.0 pts
Below Expectation
Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA, with four to five significant errors.
_7815
Edit ratingDelete rating12.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA, with more than five significant errors.
_4743
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts/ 30.0 pts
—
Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion rowThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of criterion
view longer description
Range
threshold: 5 pts
Edit ratingDelete rating5to >0 pts
Full Marks
blank
Edit ratingDelete rating0to >0 pts
No Marks
blank_2
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts/ 5 pts
—
Total Points: 350.0
