a. From your observation of the children at placement, select one child for whom you have concerns (this must be a different child than the one selected for the Behaviour Guidance assignment in 213).
b. Create an anecdotal observation of the child selected at some point throughout the day at placement.
c. Write a developmental inference based on the observation where you describe the childâs problem in developmental terms. Provide an in- text citation to support your inference.
d. Outline developmental strategy/ies to support the child in becoming accepted by peers.
Sample Solution
look into the case themselves, and 46% preferring to bypass the case on. the following question requested became in regards to PIN notices, which in particular asked if the officer has personally ever issued any for the duration of their time as an officer. even as the majority of officers had issued a PIN be aware earlier than (38 officers), there had been 12 officials who’ve now not ever issued one (proven in determine four.5 bar chart). The final question within this phase of the questionnaire asked if the officials have been privy to the sprint (2009) version, a tick list in which officials need to check with whilst assessing stalking allegations. All however two officers had been privy to the model, with forty eight participants responding with âsureâ to the question (discern 4.6). four.three opinions on stalking/stalkers the subsequent set of closed questions consists of agree and disagree answers. The purpose of those questions was to look how a lot the respondents believe the statements provided to them, to gain a wider know-how on their attitudes towards such conditions. figure four.7 suggests how respondents had been asked if they agree or disagree with the assertion âa stalker is not a criminal, they simply do now not apprehend their rights from their wrongsâ. The figure indicates how the general public of respondents had strongly disagreed with the statement (64%), with any other 30% nonetheless disagreeing, however not as strongly. The ultimate 3 contributors supplied combined views with the statement, with 1 participant strongly agreeing, 1 agreeing, and 1 being unsure. the following announcement âif an man or woman does now not appear afraid then i am less probably to take brief actionâ, supplied more of a aggregate of outcomes. figure four.8 suggests how only 12 respondents strongly disagreed with the statement, with the biggest amount of the pattern barely disagreeing (25 officers). 9 cops had been now not certain on their perspectives regarding the declaration, however there had been four officials who did agree that they’re much less in all likelihood to take brief motion. none of the individuals strongly agreed with the declaration. the next declaration turned into âstalking victims frequently overreactâ, wherein 30 respondents disagreed. whilst this changed into transcribed to 60% of the sample, the remaining solutions were break up. sixteen% of the respondents had been unsure (eight officials), and 22% (eleven respondents) strongly disagreed with the assertion. 1 respondent but, did consider the declaration (figure 4.nine). Respondents were additionally provided with the declaration âmale stalkers are greater critical than lady stalkersâ (discern 4.10). handiest 2% of the pattern agreed with the statement, and simply over half of of the sample disagreed (52%). furthermore, 30% strongly disagreed, with the final 16% being uncertain on their views. The very last announcement changed into âIf there was no physical violence, then I do not sense motion wishes to be takenâ (determine 4.11). not one of the participants agreed with this declaration, with all individuals either disagreeing or strongly disagreeing. The responses had been break up 50/50, with 25 law enforcement officials declaring they disagree, and 25 strongly disagreeing. four.4 Thematic analysis effects The final questions allowed the respondents to put in writing their solutions freely within the supplied area, without having pre-set answers provided for them. The facts changed into narro>
look into the case themselves, and 46% preferring to bypass the case on. the following question requested became in regards to PIN notices, which in particular asked if the officer has personally ever issued any for the duration of their time as an officer. even as the majority of officers had issued a PIN be aware earlier than (38 officers), there had been 12 officials who’ve now not ever issued one (proven in determine four.5 bar chart). The final question within this phase of the questionnaire asked if the officials have been privy to the sprint (2009) version, a tick list in which officials need to check with whilst assessing stalking allegations. All however two officers had been privy to the model, with forty eight participants responding with âsureâ to the question (discern 4.6). four.three opinions on stalking/stalkers the subsequent set of closed questions consists of agree and disagree answers. The purpose of those questions was to look how a lot the respondents believe the statements provided to them, to gain a wider know-how on their attitudes towards such conditions. figure four.7 suggests how respondents had been asked if they agree or disagree with the assertion âa stalker is not a criminal, they simply do now not apprehend their rights from their wrongsâ. The figure indicates how the general public of respondents had strongly disagreed with the statement (64%), with any other 30% nonetheless disagreeing, however not as strongly. The ultimate 3 contributors supplied combined views with the statement, with 1 participant strongly agreeing, 1 agreeing, and 1 being unsure. the following announcement âif an man or woman does now not appear afraid then i am less probably to take brief actionâ, supplied more of a aggregate of outcomes. figure four.8 suggests how only 12 respondents strongly disagreed with the statement, with the biggest amount of the pattern barely disagreeing (25 officers). 9 cops had been now not certain on their perspectives regarding the declaration, however there had been four officials who did agree that they’re much less in all likelihood to take brief motion. none of the individuals strongly agreed with the declaration. the next declaration turned into âstalking victims frequently overreactâ, wherein 30 respondents disagreed. whilst this changed into transcribed to 60% of the sample, the remaining solutions were break up. sixteen% of the respondents had been unsure (eight officials), and 22% (eleven respondents) strongly disagreed with the assertion. 1 respondent but, did consider the declaration (figure 4.nine). Respondents were additionally provided with the declaration âmale stalkers are greater critical than lady stalkersâ (discern 4.10). handiest 2% of the pattern agreed with the statement, and simply over half of of the sample disagreed (52%). furthermore, 30% strongly disagreed, with the final 16% being uncertain on their views. The very last announcement changed into âIf there was no physical violence, then I do not sense motion wishes to be takenâ (determine 4.11). not one of the participants agreed with this declaration, with all individuals either disagreeing or strongly disagreeing. The responses had been break up 50/50, with 25 law enforcement officials declaring they disagree, and 25 strongly disagreeing. four.4 Thematic analysis effects The final questions allowed the respondents to put in writing their solutions freely within the supplied area, without having pre-set answers provided for them. The facts changed into narro>
