- Imagine that Puritan-era Anne Bradstreet and Enlightenment-era Judith Sargent Murray read and
critique one another’s poems. What would each say about the other’s poem, both the favorable and the
unfavorable?
- You could say that both Edgar Allan Poeâs story âLigeiaâ and his poem âAnnabel Leeâ are about âmad
love,â or what the French call ‘l’amour fou.’ (The French were greater admirers of Poe than the
Americans, for many years.) My question is, What does the supernatural have to do with the special quality
of love in these two pieces? That is, how is the presence and the agency of the supernatural (in the story,
whatever it is that causes
Ligeiaâs return; in the poem, those angelsâ¦)âhow is this supernatural element used to justify the âcrazedâ
or obsessive nature of these romantic relationships?
- In a letter to Ralph Waldo Emerson, Walt Whitman said that one of the greatest lies of modern culture
was the way it repressed all talk about the human body and especially about sexâor, when it did talk
about sex, talked of it only as ânastiness.â He said such a culture would remain âcowardly and rotten,â so
long as it refused to âpublicly accept, and publicly name, with specific words, the things on which all
existence, all souls, all realization, all decency, all health, all that is worth being here for, all of woman and
of man, all beauty, all purity, all sweetness, all friendship, all strength, all life, all immortality, dependâ (p
1094).
How do the two sections assigned above from âSong of Myselfâ (#s 11 and 24) help to advance Whitmanâs
convictions about the body and sex? Thatâs reading them with the grain. But also read them against: What
ideas about genderâin relation to sex, desire, the particular bodies of men and women (as opposed to
simply
The Body)âdo these two sections of Whitmanâs poem reveal?
- Treat the four poems by Emily Dickinson as if they were chapters in the romantic life of their speaker.
Donât go searching for biographical details about Dickinson herself; rather, pretend that these four poems
are all we have from this one âI,â this speaker, and then tell that speakerâs love story. What can you tell,
from the poems
alone, about this speakerâs experience of love? And (now going against the grain) what about gender?
Can you even say whether the speaker is male or femaleâor whether the âyou,â the âthee,â is male or
female?
Read the following texts, paying special attention in each to the ways that gender and the relations
between the sexes are figured, and also to each authorâs underlying (not necessarily explicit) ideas about
gender and the sexes, and about love, sex, and marriage:
Anne Bradstreet, âA Letter to her Husband, Absent upon Public Employment,â 124-125
Judith Sargent Murray, 406-407, âOn the Equality of the Sexes,â 408-409 (just the poem, not the rest!)
Edgar Allan Poe, âAnnabel Lee,â 738-739
Poe, âLigeia,â 739-749
Walt Whitman [Section 11 from âSong of Myselfâ], âTwenty-eight young men bathe by the shore,â 1095
Whitman [Section 24 from âSong of Myselfâ], âWalt Whitman, a kosmos, of Manhattan the son,â 1105-1107
Emily Dickinson, âWild nights â Wild nights!,â 1254
Dickinson, âI never lost as much but twice,â 1250
Dickinson, âI cannot live with you,â 1266-1267
Dickinson, âMy life closed twice before itâs close,â 1271
Sample Solution
European Fascism Despotism is likewise a result of radicalism of the nineteenth century and response to progressivism of the nineteenth century. The nineteenth century radicals demanded the laissez – faire financial matters, male correspondence, specifically the advancement of people and the all inclusiveness of human reasons. The premise of every one of these goals is the sacredness of the person. Be that as it may, during the 1920s these liberal standards were tested (Paxton 36-41). The free enterprise economy drives a dingy, savage modern city, anthropological examination questions all uniformity, the monetary emergency restricted advancement and the likelihood to transform developing white collar class into low class, and the huge size of humankind To bring obliteration It is critical to explain certain things before continuing. Totalitarianism needs generally acknowledged definitions. The decision originated from Emilio Gentile (Italian totalitarianism), Stanley Payne (Spanish one party rule), Gerhart Hass (German and European one party rule), Roger Griffin (political scholar), Robert Paxton, Zeev Sternhell and Dave Renton. There is “Extremist least”. Next, there are a few ideas, for example, 14 focuses in Umberto Eco, 13 focuses in Dimitri Kitsikis, 10 focuses in Emilio Gentile. Every one of them underline comparable things that make up the extremist system. Quickly – if the world’s erudite people don’t do anything, it will decide the by and large acknowledged meaning of one party rule. Totalitarianism as a style as opposed to a procedural structure has gotten significant changes to me an approach to examine and show extremist development. One of the most significant components of European dictatorship is its procedural liquidity, the capacity to adjust to nearby mastery and standards. On the opposite side of the Atlantic Ocean we saw a compelling combination of the new Nazis and the new coalition development. This makes it considerably progressively perilous, and it gives the meaning of extremism, which can clarify that this adjustment is increasingly significant. It started with the “German antiquarian clash” that started throughout the entire existence of the European extremist history, student of history Ernst Norte upheld a few rhetoricists about the roots and understanding of the Nazi slaughter did. In the German paper in 1986: Hitler and national communists additionally carried out their “Asian” monstrosities? Didn’t the Guruku Islands be before the Auschwitz death camp? Is the slaughtering of the entire Bolshevik social class the sensible and pragmatic pioneer of “homicide” of national communism? 208 Klas-Göran Karlsson and Michael Schoenhals Review of studies on wrongdoings against humankind under the Communist organization>
European Fascism Despotism is likewise a result of radicalism of the nineteenth century and response to progressivism of the nineteenth century. The nineteenth century radicals demanded the laissez – faire financial matters, male correspondence, specifically the advancement of people and the all inclusiveness of human reasons. The premise of every one of these goals is the sacredness of the person. Be that as it may, during the 1920s these liberal standards were tested (Paxton 36-41). The free enterprise economy drives a dingy, savage modern city, anthropological examination questions all uniformity, the monetary emergency restricted advancement and the likelihood to transform developing white collar class into low class, and the huge size of humankind To bring obliteration It is critical to explain certain things before continuing. Totalitarianism needs generally acknowledged definitions. The decision originated from Emilio Gentile (Italian totalitarianism), Stanley Payne (Spanish one party rule), Gerhart Hass (German and European one party rule), Roger Griffin (political scholar), Robert Paxton, Zeev Sternhell and Dave Renton. There is “Extremist least”. Next, there are a few ideas, for example, 14 focuses in Umberto Eco, 13 focuses in Dimitri Kitsikis, 10 focuses in Emilio Gentile. Every one of them underline comparable things that make up the extremist system. Quickly – if the world’s erudite people don’t do anything, it will decide the by and large acknowledged meaning of one party rule. Totalitarianism as a style as opposed to a procedural structure has gotten significant changes to me an approach to examine and show extremist development. One of the most significant components of European dictatorship is its procedural liquidity, the capacity to adjust to nearby mastery and standards. On the opposite side of the Atlantic Ocean we saw a compelling combination of the new Nazis and the new coalition development. This makes it considerably progressively perilous, and it gives the meaning of extremism, which can clarify that this adjustment is increasingly significant. It started with the “German antiquarian clash” that started throughout the entire existence of the European extremist history, student of history Ernst Norte upheld a few rhetoricists about the roots and understanding of the Nazi slaughter did. In the German paper in 1986: Hitler and national communists additionally carried out their “Asian” monstrosities? Didn’t the Guruku Islands be before the Auschwitz death camp? Is the slaughtering of the entire Bolshevik social class the sensible and pragmatic pioneer of “homicide” of national communism? 208 Klas-Göran Karlsson and Michael Schoenhals Review of studies on wrongdoings against humankind under the Communist organization>