As an educator, when you apply for a position, many districts will ask you for your educational philosophy statement. This statement is a reflection of you and your beliefs and reasons for wanting to be an educator.
write a one page philosophy statement.
Sample Solution
Organ donation is another case which adds further difficulty. If Xâs heart failed and then was donated a heart from Y, X then shares matter with Y. What would happen in the resurrection of X and Y? However, I anticipate that Hershenov could possibly respond, that in the case of organ donation, what God could do is give Xâs original heart back. Also, if someone had lost their leg and had a prosthetic leg, God âcan makes new limbs for usâ (Hershenov,2003,34) The idea is that resurrection restores you. Nonetheless, Hershenovâs model requires the same matter in order for individuals to be resurrected. However, as I have exemplified, matter isnât unique to us as we are made up of multiple people. People who die later in history, will be composed of matter that once composed people earlier in history. For example, when X dies, Xâs dispersed matter is taken up by the plants and enter the food chain, this makes it inevitable that each of us contains vast numbers of matter that were once parts of people who were long dead. We could then, constitute some of the matter that made up Shakespeare? If Shakespeare were to get resurrected, would this mean that bits of individuals get taken away? How on earth is God going to resurrect everybody when everyoneâs materials overlap? Identity again, doesnât appear to be secure. Hershenov briefly acknowledges this problem and attempts to solve it by answering that âwe cannot all be resurrected at the same timeâ (Hersehnov,2003,34) The issue of shared matter only prevents God from instantaneously resurrecting everyone, instead staggered resurrection would happen. In staggered resurrection, the individuals who shared the same matter at their deaths, God could first resurrect one of them. Once this resurrected body had removed the needed matter. God could then use that same matter to resurrect the next person in line. On the other hand, this just seems to contradict Godâs nature. It seems strange that there would be restrictions that constrain God to stagger resurrections in this way. Why wouldnât God be able to raise all humans from >
Organ donation is another case which adds further difficulty. If Xâs heart failed and then was donated a heart from Y, X then shares matter with Y. What would happen in the resurrection of X and Y? However, I anticipate that Hershenov could possibly respond, that in the case of organ donation, what God could do is give Xâs original heart back. Also, if someone had lost their leg and had a prosthetic leg, God âcan makes new limbs for usâ (Hershenov,2003,34) The idea is that resurrection restores you. Nonetheless, Hershenovâs model requires the same matter in order for individuals to be resurrected. However, as I have exemplified, matter isnât unique to us as we are made up of multiple people. People who die later in history, will be composed of matter that once composed people earlier in history. For example, when X dies, Xâs dispersed matter is taken up by the plants and enter the food chain, this makes it inevitable that each of us contains vast numbers of matter that were once parts of people who were long dead. We could then, constitute some of the matter that made up Shakespeare? If Shakespeare were to get resurrected, would this mean that bits of individuals get taken away? How on earth is God going to resurrect everybody when everyoneâs materials overlap? Identity again, doesnât appear to be secure. Hershenov briefly acknowledges this problem and attempts to solve it by answering that âwe cannot all be resurrected at the same timeâ (Hersehnov,2003,34) The issue of shared matter only prevents God from instantaneously resurrecting everyone, instead staggered resurrection would happen. In staggered resurrection, the individuals who shared the same matter at their deaths, God could first resurrect one of them. Once this resurrected body had removed the needed matter. God could then use that same matter to resurrect the next person in line. On the other hand, this just seems to contradict Godâs nature. It seems strange that there would be restrictions that constrain God to stagger resurrections in this way. Why wouldnât God be able to raise all humans from >
