Most Important Factors in Establishing an Effective Therapeutic Alliance Between the Client and Hypnotherapist
A therapeutic alliance is defined as an agreement between the patient and the hypnotherapist on the therapeutic interventions, the tasks required to achieve those goals, as well as a feeling of a personal relationship between the patient and the hypnotherapist. Hypnotherapy is defined by the National Health Service of the United Kingdom as “a sort of alternative therapy that employs hypnosis, which is an altered state of consciousness.” Relaxation, tranquility, quiet, or imagery experiences are common hypnosis suggestions (NHS Choices, 2017). An effective therapeutic connection may boost client involvement as well as commitment in the treatment, making certain intervention strategies more likely to be effective (Uccheddu and Viola, 2006). It is also the degree to which the patient and therapist collaborate or connect emotionally, but it is thought to be a common and generic element because it is seen to pass across different treatment modalities. Both therapists and clients agree on what renders therapy successful, but one constant conclusion is that the therapeutic alliance’s quality predicts a positive therapeutic outcome (Lynch, 2012). The study will establish the most important factors for an effective therapeutic alliance between the client and hypnotherapist.
Factors in Establishing an Effective Therapeutic Alliance Between the Client and Hypnotherapist
Empathy
From the perspective of hypnotherapy achievements, empathy has been widely used. Empathy is the Hypnotherapist’s sensitive capacity and desire to understand the patient’s ideas, feelings, and challenges from the client’s perspective. Various key components make up therapeutic empathy: cognitive (recognizing the patient’s experience accurately), affective (understanding the patient’s feelings), as well as behavioral, which is expressing empathy to the patient. Several psychotherapy orientations, like person-centered, cognitive-behavioral, psychodynamic, or experiential, consider empathy a major psychotherapy element. Empathy is intended to assist patients to feel understood as well as improve the therapist-client interaction, resulting in a favorable therapeutic outcome. It also makes patients feel safer as well as at ease while self-disclosing or working on tough themes, lowers premature termination, gives a corrective emotional experience, increases cognitive-affective functioning, and encourages patients to self-heal (Schnur and Montgomery, 2010).
Given the significance of facilitating conditions and forming a therapeutic bond for an effective therapeutic outcome, relationship empathic skills training is essential for new hypnotherapists. Therapists should change their response style in line with how every patient defines and experiences helpfulness to receive effective training in the expression of empathy. Therapists can further improve client outcomes by tailoring their interpersonal presentations to other important client characteristics that influence the therapeutic alliance. Continuous learning for licensed therapists should place a strong emphasis on therapeutic interaction. For experienced practitioners, regular evaluation of interrelationship aspects is critical, and such aspects should be especially emphasized through peer consultation, ongoing training, or supervision. In order for hypnotherapists to be successful, they must take care of themselves to better care for their clients. Clinicians should be on the lookout for a decrease in their capacity to empathize with and empathize with their patients, which could signal professional stress and burnout (Lambert and Barley, 2001). In practice or research, emphasizing relationships is more likely to improve client outcomes than the present focusing on individual approaches.
A hypnotist’s use of rapport, an empathy-like feeling, can help encourage hypnotic actions and sensations. Empathy is a hypnotizable attribute which can be consistently found in high hypnotizable; therefore, empathy is necessary for establishing a hypnotic alliance. On its own (or in combination with hypnosis), empathy may help patients endure less suffering and pain during extensive medical procedures. The hypothesis is that there exists something alluring about empathy which can provide anxiolysis or analgesia during an intensive medical treatment simply by having a hypnotherapist participate in empathic treatment with patients. In such experiments, however, the hypnosis team can gain more in terms of anxiolysis, analgesia, as well as the frequency of negative impacts than the empathetic attention team in terms of anxiolysis, analgesia, or the frequency of negative effects. The increased advantage could be attributed to the particular hypnotic instructions they got, as well as the therapeutic empathy’s hypnotic-like link. As the hypnotic encounter progresses, patients in hypnotic interactions have a tendency to replicate one another’s body language or autonomic psychophysiology (Wickramasekera, 2015)
Freedom
Freedom is a crucial element of therapeutic partnership and the patient’s engagement in the process of analysis. There is no chance of a healthy therapeutic alliance and effective therapeutic activity unless the client freely decides to join the analytic process or willingly participates in it. The same would be true from the analyst’s perspective, but as hypnotherapists, they are more willing to acknowledge that their involvement in the process as trained healers is entirely voluntary. Any form of coercion, on the other hand, will have to be considered countertherapeutic. One of the goals of the process of analysis is to aid the patient to realize the neurotic restrictions on their basic freedom, understand why they exist, and discover a method to break free from them (Schafer, 2005).
Motivation
Problematic conduct is described as patient behavior that interferes with a fairly useful therapeutic method and, perhaps, with the final result in pharmacological or psychological therapies. In this sense, resisting medication, denying a mental illness, and hiding symptoms are all hazardous treatment behaviors. Therapists that insist on bringing medication, attempt to persuade clients to be more insightful, or persuade patients to abandon erroneous ideas are all attempting to address problematic behavior. Motivation aids the therapist in dealing with difficult client behavior in a non-aggressive, adaptive manner. Therapists who are aware of a troublesome behavior’s superordinate reason (that is, its instrumentality) have a better chance of proactively addressing this acceptable aim without perpetuating a problematic behavior. Motivation assists the therapist in satisfying the patient’s essential necessities by being sensitive to motives or behaviors that are suitable from the start, in addition to lowering problematic patient ’s condition (Westermann et al., 2015).
Trustworthy
The alliance’s basic foundation is trust, particularly infantile trust. Most patients attend therapeutic analysis with a sense of trust in the therapeutic analyst as well as the analytic process, at least implicitly. For patients who have an easy time trusting others, part of the analyst’s job is to help them establish a more stable situation that eliminates infantile assertions of naivete’ or ready compliance, as well as a refusal to examine, assess, and critique the analyst’s accomplishments. Excess infantile trust can lead to the patient avoiding some crucial tasks that are necessary for analytic functioning. Patients who have difficulties trusting should, on the other hand, be assisted in uncovering and resolving at least a few of the origins of their mistrust to establish the trusting security required to support analytical work. In such situations, developing and implementing a sense of confidence becomes a goal of the analytical process, taking great effort at times (Frank, 2004).
Neutrality and Abstinence
They are inherent alliance attributes, but only when viewed through the lens of cooperation. Neutrality is not a behavioral standard that dictates how a hypnotherapist should or should not perform or communicate with a patient. Neutrality is a mental state where the hypnotherapist examines the therapeutic contact with as much impartiality as possible as well as determines what plan of intervention and response is appropriate and suitable for supporting therapeutic work as well as the advancement of the patient. Neutrality relates to the analyst’s involvement in the process of analysis, but not in the same manner as reality-based engagement and countertransference (Meissner, 2007).
Conclusion
The most important factors for an effective therapeutic alliance between the client and hypnotherapist are empathy, freedom, trustworthiness, neutrality and abstinence, autonomy, and ethical considerations. Both therapists and clients agree on what renders therapy successful, but one constant conclusion is that the therapeutic alliance’s quality predicts a positive therapeutic outcome if the above factors are utilized. Besides the analysis and therapy being carried out with total honesty and without any concealment and dishonesty on the side of both the patient and the therapist, the confidentiality criteria must also be strictly adhered to. Given the significance of facilitating conditions and forming a therapeutic bond for an effective therapeutic outcome, relationship empathic skills training is essential for new hypnotherapists. Patients who have difficulties trusting should, on the other hand, be assisted in uncovering and resolving at least a few of the origins of their mistrust to establish the trusting security required to support analytical work. In conclusion, while the therapeutic alliance is a promising beginning point for developing both pharmaceutical and psychotherapeutic therapies, a therapy connection framework is required in symptom control.
References
Frank, K. A., 2004. The analyst’s trust and therapeutic action. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 73, 335–378.https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/j.2167-4086.2004.tb00161.x
Lambert, M.J. and Barley, D.E., 2001. Research summary on the therapeutic relationship and psychotherapy outcome. Psychotherapy: Theory, research, practice, training, 38(4), p.357.https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2F0033-3204.38.4.357
Lynch, M. M., 2012. Factors influencing successful psychotherapy outcomes.
Meissner, W.W., 2007. Therapeutic alliance: Theme and variations. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 24(2), p.231.https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2007-05779-003
NHS Choices. 2017. Hypnotherapy [online]. Available from:https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/hypnotherapy
Schafer, R., 2005. Caring and coercive aspects of the psychoanalytic situation. Journal of the British Psychoanalytic Association, 53, 771–787.https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/00030651050530032101
Schnur, J.B. and Montgomery, G.H., 2010. A systematic review of therapeutic alliance, group cohesion, empathy, and goal consensus/collaboration in psychotherapeutic interventions in cancer: Uncommon factors?. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(2), pp.238-247.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0272735809001603
Uccheddu, O.M. and Viola, A., 2006. Descriptive survey of Therapeutic Alliance in Hypnotherapy. European Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 7(1).
Westermann, S., Cavelti, M., Heibach, E., and Caspar F., 2015. Motive-oriented therapeutic relationship building for patients diagnosed with schizophrenia. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01294/full
Wickramasekera, I.E., 2015. Mysteries of hypnosis and the self are revealed by the psychology and neuroscience of empathy. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 57(3), pp.330-348.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00029157.2014.978495
