After a successful Phase I and using the feedback given to you, analyze your company using the prescribed tools.
Key component of Phase II paper (SWOT Analysis and Stakeholder Analysis):
SWOT Analysis
Strengths â tangible internal resources available to the company (specialty engineering equipment, specially trained personnel).
Weaknesses â Factors that are within an organizationâs control that may be detracting from the companyâs ability to maintain its competitive advantage. Which areas of the organization will be targeted for improvement through your strategic plan?
Opportunities â Factors (which are influenced by competition) that, if incorporated, will allow for organizational success.
Threats â Factors beyond the control of the organization, and the organizationâs contingency plan for addressing these threats.
Major Stakeholder Analysis
List individuals who have a major influence over your organization (also note whether the influence is positive or negative).
List the individualâs level of importance within the organization, and their ability to influence adoption of policies, procedures, etc.
Describe how your organization incorporates the opinions of the stakeholder into the organizationâs activities.
Sample Solution
the terroristsâ enemies as it’s miles this which effect the terrorist motivations, strategies, organisational structures and desires. consequently, constructivist reading discourse in preference to the character is probable to give a extra correct view of actorâs motivations. an investigation into metaphorical structures of terrorism by using hulsse and spencer in 2008 shows that the exchange in the way the media constructed terrorism is probably because of us âgetting used to al qaeda terrorismâ[9]. terrorism therefore lends itself to constructivist knowledge as photographs of terror exist in exceptional tiers of production and the manner in which the media gives terrorism has a huge impact on how states respond to it. terrorism possibly quality lends itself to constructivist information because of the failure of other ir theories to recognize the constructivist orientation of al qaeda and this has lead them to come up with a nation centric analysis of terrorism. a constructivist technique, thanks to its multidisciplinary know-how can provide extra potential insights approximately the position of norms, thoughts, time and context in shaping the relation between states and terrorism as non-nation actor. realism has very little to make contributions to the discussion of al qaeda as a transnational actor publish Sep 11. that is because at realisms center is the perception that international affairs is a warfare for power among self-involved states. foreign coverage writer jack snyder argues because of this approach âit is tough for the nation-centric principle to provide an explanation for why the sectorâs most effective superpower introduced a conflict towards al qaeda, a non-country terrorist organizationâ[10]. worldwide members of the family writer burak okürkçü[11] that the assumptions of liberalism on democratic institutions with liberal values and neoliberal understanding of peaceful trade with the assist of institutions additionally fails to effectively well known terrorist agencies or explain terrorist hobby. an undivided opinion at the identity of âstateâ on one hand, fractured know-how of defining terrorism on the other hand makes it quite hard to set up a solid floor with traditional theories. one the alternative hand, constructivists do not have a photograph of the arena to be challenged by way of Sep 11 due to the fact they accept as true with the universe exists inside the thoughts of the people involved in it. âalthough constructivism offers no image of what the world is like, it pushes enquiry into the techniques with the aid of which people assemble understandingsâ[12]. from a constructivist factor of view September 11 came about because of a built identity that is antipathy for âthe westâ and additionally an businesses preference to assemble a new identity, one among a pan-islamic movement. lynch uses the basic tenets of constructivism which we mentioned as âthoughts, identities and normsâ[13] to show how al-qaedaâs strategy submit-9/11 lends itself to constructivist knowledge. consistent with lynch âal-qaedaâs strategy seeks to promote an islamic âidentificationâ, define the âpursuitsâ of all muslims as always in confrontation with the west, and form the ânormative environment wherein muslim politics are contestedâ[14]. sayf al-adel, an al-qaeda strategist argued in a march 2005 interview that the âattack of Sept. 11 had succeeded in its primary goal of enticing america into direct interventions in the arab locationâ[15]. this truly suggests why constructivists don’t forget a transnational group with ideological impact to be an eligible actor on the political degree. terrorist groups like al-qaeda lend themselves to constructivist knowledge due to the fact in contrast to the opposite ir theories constructivists see structures and actors as mutually constituted. this is because it isn’t always continually that the structure determines states pursuits and moves but occasionally agents can affect the character and the consequences of a shape. david schild makes use of the case examine of al qaeda in his dissertation piece to argue that we can use constructivism to apprehend the sports of al qaeda and this highlights the âvalue and appropriatenessâ[16] of constructivist enquiry. through this analysis of al-qaeda, david schild>
the terroristsâ enemies as it’s miles this which effect the terrorist motivations, strategies, organisational structures and desires. consequently, constructivist reading discourse in preference to the character is probable to give a extra correct view of actorâs motivations. an investigation into metaphorical structures of terrorism by using hulsse and spencer in 2008 shows that the exchange in the way the media constructed terrorism is probably because of us âgetting used to al qaeda terrorismâ[9]. terrorism therefore lends itself to constructivist knowledge as photographs of terror exist in exceptional tiers of production and the manner in which the media gives terrorism has a huge impact on how states respond to it. terrorism possibly quality lends itself to constructivist information because of the failure of other ir theories to recognize the constructivist orientation of al qaeda and this has lead them to come up with a nation centric analysis of terrorism. a constructivist technique, thanks to its multidisciplinary know-how can provide extra potential insights approximately the position of norms, thoughts, time and context in shaping the relation between states and terrorism as non-nation actor. realism has very little to make contributions to the discussion of al qaeda as a transnational actor publish Sep 11. that is because at realisms center is the perception that international affairs is a warfare for power among self-involved states. foreign coverage writer jack snyder argues because of this approach âit is tough for the nation-centric principle to provide an explanation for why the sectorâs most effective superpower introduced a conflict towards al qaeda, a non-country terrorist organizationâ[10]. worldwide members of the family writer burak okürkçü[11] that the assumptions of liberalism on democratic institutions with liberal values and neoliberal understanding of peaceful trade with the assist of institutions additionally fails to effectively well known terrorist agencies or explain terrorist hobby. an undivided opinion at the identity of âstateâ on one hand, fractured know-how of defining terrorism on the other hand makes it quite hard to set up a solid floor with traditional theories. one the alternative hand, constructivists do not have a photograph of the arena to be challenged by way of Sep 11 due to the fact they accept as true with the universe exists inside the thoughts of the people involved in it. âalthough constructivism offers no image of what the world is like, it pushes enquiry into the techniques with the aid of which people assemble understandingsâ[12]. from a constructivist factor of view September 11 came about because of a built identity that is antipathy for âthe westâ and additionally an businesses preference to assemble a new identity, one among a pan-islamic movement. lynch uses the basic tenets of constructivism which we mentioned as âthoughts, identities and normsâ[13] to show how al-qaedaâs strategy submit-9/11 lends itself to constructivist knowledge. consistent with lynch âal-qaedaâs strategy seeks to promote an islamic âidentificationâ, define the âpursuitsâ of all muslims as always in confrontation with the west, and form the ânormative environment wherein muslim politics are contestedâ[14]. sayf al-adel, an al-qaeda strategist argued in a march 2005 interview that the âattack of Sept. 11 had succeeded in its primary goal of enticing america into direct interventions in the arab locationâ[15]. this truly suggests why constructivists don’t forget a transnational group with ideological impact to be an eligible actor on the political degree. terrorist groups like al-qaeda lend themselves to constructivist knowledge due to the fact in contrast to the opposite ir theories constructivists see structures and actors as mutually constituted. this is because it isn’t always continually that the structure determines states pursuits and moves but occasionally agents can affect the character and the consequences of a shape. david schild makes use of the case examine of al qaeda in his dissertation piece to argue that we can use constructivism to apprehend the sports of al qaeda and this highlights the âvalue and appropriatenessâ[16] of constructivist enquiry. through this analysis of al-qaeda, david schild>
