Write an essay (at least 1250 words) in which you evaluate the ways in which cultural depictions of the male body illustrate differences of race, ethnicity, class, and sexual orientation among American men in the 20th and 21st centuries. Your essay should focus on these three questions: ï· What roles have cultural products played in these depictions of the male body and differences between men? ï· How have boys and men consumed these products? ï· How have such cultural works depicted the male body in ways that demonstrate inequities of power among men? To complete this essay successfully, be sure that you understand and define cultural products in your essay. You must include discussion of at least two of the assigned films for the course, as well as at least three other forms of cultural expression (specific products).
Using the films: The best years of our lives, Taxi Driver, Deliverance.
Sample Solution
During the 1980s, with the appearance of Michael Jordan’s Air Jordan’s Nike propelled “tennis shoe culture”. From wellness shoe to road chic frill, the ascent of tennis shoe culture mirrors perhaps the best creation affected by mainstream society, music, and sports. Anticipated to reach $220.2 billion in esteem by 2020 (Weinswig, 2016), the fixation for tennis shoes is flourishing. Be that as it may, dominant part of ladies feel avoided. Female “sneakerheads”, the term to a great extent used to portray an individual who commends, gathers, sells as well as exchanges shoes as a type of a side interest, have become a main impetus behind the quickly developing business sector. Up to this point, the sneakerhead scene has been strongly male overwhelmed. In 2017, Bloomberg, an information and media organization, directed an examination that demonstrates ladies make up over 85% of customer buys in the United States (Lewis, n.d.). Most ladies, when shopping, consider the item they get before buying. This may incorporate life span, quality, and cost. Ladies at last make brilliant buys, ones that incorporate uncommon limits and offers so they believe they are purchasing with a decent reason and, great deal. Simply Ask a Woman: Cracking the Code of What Women Want and How They Buy (Quinlan, 2003) clarifies why ladies incline toward a buy that is supportable and helpful while men purchase the main thing that they feel will work for them. At the point when numerous ladies become exhausted, focused, or in any event, when they are feeling incredible, they shop. Ebates, a part discount site, directed an ongoing review that demonstrates 66% of American grown-ups and 75% of youngsters concur shopping makes them feel much improved, and is a decent solution for fatigue (Bain, 2016). Ladies make up numerous business sectors as they hold a few situations in the public arena. Ladies are essential parental figures for youngsters and old, accomplices, family members, in-laws, and associates. When all is said in done, ladies shop for other people (Brennan, 2013). Frequently ladies assume responsibility in blessing giving. Ladies deal with the looking, shopping, planning, wrapping, and giving of blessings. At the point when given fulfilling administration ladies buyers tell companions, family, and others, which acquires more business for retailers (Brennan, 2013). Ladies likewise make up 74.9% of family unit shopping (MRI’s review of the American buyers, 2011). At last, ladies control the greater part of the shopping, as they comprehend what they are purchasing and why. In October of 1997 the National Organization for Women and the Ms. Establishment for Women misused Nike, the American retailer, of work misuse. In a letter to Nike’s director, Philip Knight, the two associations talked on how Nike promotions focusing on ladies transfer pictures of support and inspiration however the ladies making the shoes are dealt with unreasonably and inadequately (Greenhouse, 1997). The ladies introduced in the promotions don’t mirror the treatment in the processing plants. Nike’s flawed work practices may propose that Nike didn’t bolster ladies. Some may contend that Nike has made better lives for individuals through its activity contributions, which is valid, yet it has likewise crushed lives through its maltreatment. As indicated by Nike’s HR Chief Monique Matheson, Nike has promised to address its sexual orientation pay holes and social disparity issues (April 4, 2018). Nike’s sexual orientation opportunity hole is a portrayal of their one-sided corporate culture. Placing more ladies in incredible positions would drive Nike’s ladies promoting and item improvement to be progressively comprehensive. This, however it would allow ladies to demonstrate they are similarly as significant in sports and shoe culture as men. Only a couple of years before Nike’s work abuse, it was accounted for that Nike spent more than $138 million on advertisements, however just 15% of that sum was focused at ladies buyers (Enrico, 1995). Nike accepted ladies’ publicizing would bargain their games picture which is the reason most went to target youngster young men and men (Grow, 2006). Nike’s ladies’ battles impacted ladies to turn out to be progressively engaged and entitled yet did exclude item accentuation on tennis shoes. In mid 2009, Nike gathered gendered contention through its coordinated enrollment battle. Promotions indicated people running with the subtitles “One more thing for men to lead” and “Women first. Men second.” The Men versus Ladies Challenge proposes an aberrant call for sex control. Nike has consistently made men increasingly prevalent through its showcasing and item improvement along these lines making them the biggest focused on group of spectators. While it is certain there are huge complexities in the manners shoes are made for, and exhibited to, people, a few ladies concur it isn’t the expectation of the brand to prohibit ladies from tennis shoe culture. The originator and CEO of NYC-based streetwear attire brand Married to the Mob talked with Paper magazine (October 2, 2015), saying “⦠Adidas, Nike, Reebok and Puma see now. They’re beginning to put all the more promoting cash and more vitality behind ladies’ ⦠” (Weiss, 2015). This may demonstrate that brands are acknowledging ladies produce greater part of benefits. Sports supports show that sports all the more emphatically impact the avoidance of ladies from shoe culture. As indicated by Forbes.com “Nike goes through $2 billion per year on promoting, spending luxuriously on supports for genius competitors and famous people” (Goldman, 2012). In 1996, Nike presented its first ladies’ tennis shoe intended for a female competitor, Sheryl Swoopes. The production of this shoe gave other female competitors the sentiment of having a place with the games business. This started a development among different games tennis shoe organizations and by 1999 six mark shoes respecting female competitors were available (Gaillot, 2016). Presently, in the present market, there are zero shoes named after female competitors. Top male competitors Carmelo Anthony, Chris Paul, and Blake Griffin, all have no title titles, have signature tennis shoes. Elizabeth Semmelhack, senior keeper at Toronto’s Bata Shoe Museum says “I think this has to do with our general public’s confounded association with the thoughts and gentility and physicality” (Bobila, 2015). In an industry for the most part determined by sports and music, where men are to a great extent cared for, ladies are deserted. In a Nike ladies’ emphasis bunch on April 13, 2018, Ariana Rodriguez says “for such a long time men ruled better than ladies, that still stays valid in the tennis shoe industry.” A gathering of seven ladies met up and concurred ordinarily, female shoes are wearing “girly” hues, for example, pink and purple and highlighted with sparkle and such things. The couple of tennis shoes made for ladies don’t mirror the needs and needs of most ladies. “Ladies’ investment in tennis shoe culture isn’t yet-settled issue,” said Semmelhack. Matt Powell of The NPD Group evaluated ladies’ sneakerhead showcase at $200 million, a number that would be altogether bigger if tennis shoe organizations perceived the interest for ladies’ predefined items. Powell indicates ladies’ tennis shoe deals in the US have not become because of absence of ladies’ predetermined items (Powell, 2014). Athletic organizations can’t disregard 51% of the total populace as potential customers. Regardless of whether it’s female shopping propensities or their effect on society and sports, female sneakerheads demonstrate to be an important market.>
During the 1980s, with the appearance of Michael Jordan’s Air Jordan’s Nike propelled “tennis shoe culture”. From wellness shoe to road chic frill, the ascent of tennis shoe culture mirrors perhaps the best creation affected by mainstream society, music, and sports. Anticipated to reach $220.2 billion in esteem by 2020 (Weinswig, 2016), the fixation for tennis shoes is flourishing. Be that as it may, dominant part of ladies feel avoided. Female “sneakerheads”, the term to a great extent used to portray an individual who commends, gathers, sells as well as exchanges shoes as a type of a side interest, have become a main impetus behind the quickly developing business sector. Up to this point, the sneakerhead scene has been strongly male overwhelmed. In 2017, Bloomberg, an information and media organization, directed an examination that demonstrates ladies make up over 85% of customer buys in the United States (Lewis, n.d.). Most ladies, when shopping, consider the item they get before buying. This may incorporate life span, quality, and cost. Ladies at last make brilliant buys, ones that incorporate uncommon limits and offers so they believe they are purchasing with a decent reason and, great deal. Simply Ask a Woman: Cracking the Code of What Women Want and How They Buy (Quinlan, 2003) clarifies why ladies incline toward a buy that is supportable and helpful while men purchase the main thing that they feel will work for them. At the point when numerous ladies become exhausted, focused, or in any event, when they are feeling incredible, they shop. Ebates, a part discount site, directed an ongoing review that demonstrates 66% of American grown-ups and 75% of youngsters concur shopping makes them feel much improved, and is a decent solution for fatigue (Bain, 2016). Ladies make up numerous business sectors as they hold a few situations in the public arena. Ladies are essential parental figures for youngsters and old, accomplices, family members, in-laws, and associates. When all is said in done, ladies shop for other people (Brennan, 2013). Frequently ladies assume responsibility in blessing giving. Ladies deal with the looking, shopping, planning, wrapping, and giving of blessings. At the point when given fulfilling administration ladies buyers tell companions, family, and others, which acquires more business for retailers (Brennan, 2013). Ladies likewise make up 74.9% of family unit shopping (MRI’s review of the American buyers, 2011). At last, ladies control the greater part of the shopping, as they comprehend what they are purchasing and why. In October of 1997 the National Organization for Women and the Ms. Establishment for Women misused Nike, the American retailer, of work misuse. In a letter to Nike’s director, Philip Knight, the two associations talked on how Nike promotions focusing on ladies transfer pictures of support and inspiration however the ladies making the shoes are dealt with unreasonably and inadequately (Greenhouse, 1997). The ladies introduced in the promotions don’t mirror the treatment in the processing plants. Nike’s flawed work practices may propose that Nike didn’t bolster ladies. Some may contend that Nike has made better lives for individuals through its activity contributions, which is valid, yet it has likewise crushed lives through its maltreatment. As indicated by Nike’s HR Chief Monique Matheson, Nike has promised to address its sexual orientation pay holes and social disparity issues (April 4, 2018). Nike’s sexual orientation opportunity hole is a portrayal of their one-sided corporate culture. Placing more ladies in incredible positions would drive Nike’s ladies promoting and item improvement to be progressively comprehensive. This, however it would allow ladies to demonstrate they are similarly as significant in sports and shoe culture as men. Only a couple of years before Nike’s work abuse, it was accounted for that Nike spent more than $138 million on advertisements, however just 15% of that sum was focused at ladies buyers (Enrico, 1995). Nike accepted ladies’ publicizing would bargain their games picture which is the reason most went to target youngster young men and men (Grow, 2006). Nike’s ladies’ battles impacted ladies to turn out to be progressively engaged and entitled yet did exclude item accentuation on tennis shoes. In mid 2009, Nike gathered gendered contention through its coordinated enrollment battle. Promotions indicated people running with the subtitles “One more thing for men to lead” and “Women first. Men second.” The Men versus Ladies Challenge proposes an aberrant call for sex control. Nike has consistently made men increasingly prevalent through its showcasing and item improvement along these lines making them the biggest focused on group of spectators. While it is certain there are huge complexities in the manners shoes are made for, and exhibited to, people, a few ladies concur it isn’t the expectation of the brand to prohibit ladies from tennis shoe culture. The originator and CEO of NYC-based streetwear attire brand Married to the Mob talked with Paper magazine (October 2, 2015), saying “⦠Adidas, Nike, Reebok and Puma see now. They’re beginning to put all the more promoting cash and more vitality behind ladies’ ⦠” (Weiss, 2015). This may demonstrate that brands are acknowledging ladies produce greater part of benefits. Sports supports show that sports all the more emphatically impact the avoidance of ladies from shoe culture. As indicated by Forbes.com “Nike goes through $2 billion per year on promoting, spending luxuriously on supports for genius competitors and famous people” (Goldman, 2012). In 1996, Nike presented its first ladies’ tennis shoe intended for a female competitor, Sheryl Swoopes. The production of this shoe gave other female competitors the sentiment of having a place with the games business. This started a development among different games tennis shoe organizations and by 1999 six mark shoes respecting female competitors were available (Gaillot, 2016). Presently, in the present market, there are zero shoes named after female competitors. Top male competitors Carmelo Anthony, Chris Paul, and Blake Griffin, all have no title titles, have signature tennis shoes. Elizabeth Semmelhack, senior keeper at Toronto’s Bata Shoe Museum says “I think this has to do with our general public’s confounded association with the thoughts and gentility and physicality” (Bobila, 2015). In an industry for the most part determined by sports and music, where men are to a great extent cared for, ladies are deserted. In a Nike ladies’ emphasis bunch on April 13, 2018, Ariana Rodriguez says “for such a long time men ruled better than ladies, that still stays valid in the tennis shoe industry.” A gathering of seven ladies met up and concurred ordinarily, female shoes are wearing “girly” hues, for example, pink and purple and highlighted with sparkle and such things. The couple of tennis shoes made for ladies don’t mirror the needs and needs of most ladies. “Ladies’ investment in tennis shoe culture isn’t yet-settled issue,” said Semmelhack. Matt Powell of The NPD Group evaluated ladies’ sneakerhead showcase at $200 million, a number that would be altogether bigger if tennis shoe organizations perceived the interest for ladies’ predefined items. Powell indicates ladies’ tennis shoe deals in the US have not become because of absence of ladies’ predetermined items (Powell, 2014). Athletic organizations can’t disregard 51% of the total populace as potential customers. Regardless of whether it’s female shopping propensities or their effect on society and sports, female sneakerheads demonstrate to be an important market.>
