A literature review aims to highlight the current state of knowledge regarding a topic under study. Literature reviews are comprised of secondary sources and as such do not report any new or original experimental work. The main purpose of a literature review is to situate the current study within the body of literature and to provide context for the reader. A literature review is not a summary but a synthesis of the material you have read. In this course the purpose of the literature review is to answer a significant clinical question.
Instructions:
Your paper needs to follow the following criteria:
Choose a problem faced by clients in your practice area that you think is important and would like to learn more about.
Use your knowledge of PICO to develop a well-build narrow clinical question. For example: In adult patients with total hip replacements (P), how effective is pain medication (I) compared to aerobic stretching (C) in controlling post-operative pain (O)? (the development of the PICO question should not be including in the paper).
Write a five (5) page literature review paper on the standing knowledge of the chosen question.
Include a minimum of five (5) journal articles, at least three (3) from nursing journals. However, make sure that the (5) journals are the oneâs analyzed and synthesized in the results and discussion sections.
The body of the paper should be made of the following titled sections: Title (introduction), Methods, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion.
Provide a specific and concise tentative title for your literature review paper (You may use the results or at least the variables in the title).
Abstract is not required
Include a 1-page introduction of your topic (background information), the focus/aim of your review. The introduction should include a statement of the problem, briefly explain the significance of your topic study, and act to introduce the reader to your definitions and background. Must include your main statement (i.e. the purpose of this review isâ¦{PICO Question}).
The method section should include sources, databases, keywords, inclusion/exclusion criteria, and other information that establish credibility to your paper.
The results should summarize the findings of studies that have been conducted on your topic. For each study you should briefly explain its purpose, procedure for data collection and major findings. This is the section where you will discuss the strengths and weaknesses of studies.
The discussion should be like a conclusion portion of an essay paper. It serves as a summary of the body of your literature review and should highlight the most important findings. Your analysis should help you to draw conclusions. In this section you would discussion any consensus or disagreement on the topic. It can also include any strengths and weaknesses in general of the research area. If you believe there is more to research, you may include that here.
Finally, you will need to conclude your paper. At this point you have put substantial effort into your paper. Close this chapter with a summary of the paper, major findings and any major recommendation for the profession.
In general, your paper should show a sense of direction and contain a definite central idea supported with evidence. The writing should be logical, and the ideas should be linked together in a logical sequence. The ideas need to be put together clearly to the writer and to the reader.
Papers will be graded by rubric.
Sample Solution
In this paper I am going to discuss how it is helpful to investigate and use distinctive attracting strategies craftsmanship and configuration to guarantee understudies arrive at maximum capacity and locate their visual language. In the wake of contemplating an Art establishment degree and a BA in delineation and Animation at Manchester metropolitan college I have felt direct the significance of utilizing non conventional attracting techniques to help rouse inventiveness. Advancing exploratory drawing procedures FE and HE and the imaginative expressions all in all can assist understudies with finding their own visual vernacular. Concentrating on the positive effect of permitting understudy to expolore different materials and procedures while considering workmanship and configuration will ideally diagram the significance of the present Scheme of learning and ideally by encorporating progressively test opportunity and featuring the significance of understudies information on different teqiques and not simply conventional apparatuses i.e pencil and paper. I am setting an undertaking in which my level two craftsmanship and plan dimploma understudies will utilize non customary attracting devices to make. I will at that point question them to check whether this experiement builds eagerness and inspiration and⬠inventivness. I will take a gander at different understudies’ responses to utilizing non conventional materials and request that they keep an inventive journal and note their contemplations and emotions on making fine art with instruments, for example, sticks and ink, blanch, their left hand and feet. By addressing toward the start of the meetings I am ready to in a flash distinguish every individual quality, I am capable perceive students that are locked in and students that are fearful or less sure about learning another technique to making craftsmanship. I will start the meetings with a basic composing task, which at that point permits the students to consider the substance of what they are making and permits thoughts to shape before beginning. I will at that point take a gander at their reaction and innovative results to outwardly recognize in the event that it has greatly affected results aswell as questionning understudies to check whether intellectually it has had an incredible effect. I will take a gander at the understudies level 2 Art and structure dimploma to check whether recording innovative minutes and examining past work has demonstrated benificial and if utilizing non customary techniques, for example, hands and sticks to paint has been useful in remaining imaganative. The Scheme of learning for the workmanship and plan confirmation is part into eight units, the first being a prologue to materials and procedures. My point is revive the significance of investigation and check whether it benfits in being a fundamental continus topic all through the course and not simply in the principal couple of units. For an evening, understudies will be set non customary drawing undertaking, and afterward toward the day’s end be quieried whether the explorationtion has incited thoughts for their up and coming task/FMP. Permitting space for non conventional drawing teqniques may help rouse understudies â¬and improve confidence.If a positive response is given from the understudies this may feature the advantages of having ordinary evenings spent to upgrade innovativeness and improved learning/results. This may likewise show students who truly permitted themselves into an unfamillar innovative encounter may create an assortment or intresting, interesting results. Likewise I will likewise have the option to separate and backing/challenge my understudies by shift the length or amount of the errands set, providing food for various capacities and permitting space for direction. This short undertaking to permit understudies to find their own visual language covers uniformity and decent variety, English, Math’s and Differentiation, hand outs and assignments would be or written in layman’s terms and separated for simple perusing/diverse shaded paper for understudies who endure with dyslexia or a SPLD. When setting the exercises on investigating material framework will occur and a starter movement will happen for five minuets or somewhere in the vicinity, comprising of a composed errand requesting that the students record a few words identifying with learning new procedures. The words can be anything, including musings and sentiments towards making or being totally trial while making work of art. While assessing the educational program I need to consider how I as a professional, my specialty and my oransieation assess, there are a wide range of strategies and evalation models, eg; scrivens (2001) developmental assessment model, Tyler (1949) destinations model; Kirkpatricks (1998) ‘four level’ model ~ response, learning, move, results. The most proficient was to utilize the model is beginning with level four and going backward, the four levels speak to the basics yet it is fundamental you utilize the key in the correct manner. I uncovered at the top of the priority list Kirkpatricks assessment process as I might suspect utilizing the four levels, eg. Response: How understudies respond to the procedures they have been instructed. Is a decent developmental approach to quantify how advantageous the exercise was? Did the understudy think that its valuable? Learn: Then what did the understudy really gained from the exercise. At that point by utilizing developmental appraisal as an approach to gauge how effective the exercise was or a Q&A can give a speedy proficient approach to check whether the understudy has discovered the exercise quick or educated another aptitude. Conduct: This is then is to check whether the understudies have really utilized those new aptitudes they have picked up and check whether they mull over them while making future craftsmanship. A decent method to perceive this is through 1:1 instructional exercises where the understudy’s sketchbooks and portfolio is looked into and examined. 1:1 instructional exercises underline Petty’s announcement “When one is learning, one might need to pose inquiries at any phase during the learning procedure. Realize that a few understudies are too bashful to even consider asking inquiries before their schoolmates; the instructor needs to offer such understudies the chance to pose inquiries in a coordinated circumstance. This open door is frequently best given during the ‘utilization’ period of the learning procedure, where the instructor as a rule moves among the understudies, checking and noting singular questions” Result: Lastly, what did this recently discovered aptitude/perspective outcome in, for example has inventive yield improved, has the understudy had the option to communicate all the more unreservedly?>
In this paper I am going to discuss how it is helpful to investigate and use distinctive attracting strategies craftsmanship and configuration to guarantee understudies arrive at maximum capacity and locate their visual language. In the wake of contemplating an Art establishment degree and a BA in delineation and Animation at Manchester metropolitan college I have felt direct the significance of utilizing non conventional attracting techniques to help rouse inventiveness. Advancing exploratory drawing procedures FE and HE and the imaginative expressions all in all can assist understudies with finding their own visual vernacular. Concentrating on the positive effect of permitting understudy to expolore different materials and procedures while considering workmanship and configuration will ideally diagram the significance of the present Scheme of learning and ideally by encorporating progressively test opportunity and featuring the significance of understudies information on different teqiques and not simply conventional apparatuses i.e pencil and paper. I am setting an undertaking in which my level two craftsmanship and plan dimploma understudies will utilize non customary attracting devices to make. I will at that point question them to check whether this experiement builds eagerness and inspiration and⬠inventivness. I will take a gander at different understudies’ responses to utilizing non conventional materials and request that they keep an inventive journal and note their contemplations and emotions on making fine art with instruments, for example, sticks and ink, blanch, their left hand and feet. By addressing toward the start of the meetings I am ready to in a flash distinguish every individual quality, I am capable perceive students that are locked in and students that are fearful or less sure about learning another technique to making craftsmanship. I will start the meetings with a basic composing task, which at that point permits the students to consider the substance of what they are making and permits thoughts to shape before beginning. I will at that point take a gander at their reaction and innovative results to outwardly recognize in the event that it has greatly affected results aswell as questionning understudies to check whether intellectually it has had an incredible effect. I will take a gander at the understudies level 2 Art and structure dimploma to check whether recording innovative minutes and examining past work has demonstrated benificial and if utilizing non customary techniques, for example, hands and sticks to paint has been useful in remaining imaganative. The Scheme of learning for the workmanship and plan confirmation is part into eight units, the first being a prologue to materials and procedures. My point is revive the significance of investigation and check whether it benfits in being a fundamental continus topic all through the course and not simply in the principal couple of units. For an evening, understudies will be set non customary drawing undertaking, and afterward toward the day’s end be quieried whether the explorationtion has incited thoughts for their up and coming task/FMP. Permitting space for non conventional drawing teqniques may help rouse understudies â¬and improve confidence.If a positive response is given from the understudies this may feature the advantages of having ordinary evenings spent to upgrade innovativeness and improved learning/results. This may likewise show students who truly permitted themselves into an unfamillar innovative encounter may create an assortment or intresting, interesting results. Likewise I will likewise have the option to separate and backing/challenge my understudies by shift the length or amount of the errands set, providing food for various capacities and permitting space for direction. This short undertaking to permit understudies to find their own visual language covers uniformity and decent variety, English, Math’s and Differentiation, hand outs and assignments would be or written in layman’s terms and separated for simple perusing/diverse shaded paper for understudies who endure with dyslexia or a SPLD. When setting the exercises on investigating material framework will occur and a starter movement will happen for five minuets or somewhere in the vicinity, comprising of a composed errand requesting that the students record a few words identifying with learning new procedures. The words can be anything, including musings and sentiments towards making or being totally trial while making work of art. While assessing the educational program I need to consider how I as a professional, my specialty and my oransieation assess, there are a wide range of strategies and evalation models, eg; scrivens (2001) developmental assessment model, Tyler (1949) destinations model; Kirkpatricks (1998) ‘four level’ model ~ response, learning, move, results. The most proficient was to utilize the model is beginning with level four and going backward, the four levels speak to the basics yet it is fundamental you utilize the key in the correct manner. I uncovered at the top of the priority list Kirkpatricks assessment process as I might suspect utilizing the four levels, eg. Response: How understudies respond to the procedures they have been instructed. Is a decent developmental approach to quantify how advantageous the exercise was? Did the understudy think that its valuable? Learn: Then what did the understudy really gained from the exercise. At that point by utilizing developmental appraisal as an approach to gauge how effective the exercise was or a Q&A can give a speedy proficient approach to check whether the understudy has discovered the exercise quick or educated another aptitude. Conduct: This is then is to check whether the understudies have really utilized those new aptitudes they have picked up and check whether they mull over them while making future craftsmanship. A decent method to perceive this is through 1:1 instructional exercises where the understudy’s sketchbooks and portfolio is looked into and examined. 1:1 instructional exercises underline Petty’s announcement “When one is learning, one might need to pose inquiries at any phase during the learning procedure. Realize that a few understudies are too bashful to even consider asking inquiries before their schoolmates; the instructor needs to offer such understudies the chance to pose inquiries in a coordinated circumstance. This open door is frequently best given during the ‘utilization’ period of the learning procedure, where the instructor as a rule moves among the understudies, checking and noting singular questions” Result: Lastly, what did this recently discovered aptitude/perspective outcome in, for example has inventive yield improved, has the understudy had the option to communicate all the more unreservedly?>
