- Give a brief history of the multiple criteria rule in Georgia. When and where did it begin? How did development of multiple criteria proceed?
- Compare and contrast the major differences in the previous rule 160-4-2-.08 and the current rule.
- Explain the justification of multiple criteria for identifying gifted students and in the planning of appropriate programs.
- Consider the impact of using limited criteria for the selection of gifted. Discuss the populations who are most likely to be âmissedâ when only one method is used to determine eligibility for gifted programs. Discuss the strengths and/or challenges with multiple criteria.
Sample Solution
To understand Keynes, it is important to note that unlike most economists nowadays, his key target was to get completely rid of unemployment: the âreal problem, fundamental yet essentially simple is to provide employment for everyone.â His objective for unemployment is âthe sort of level we are facing in wartime less than 1 per cent.â Keynes strongly denied that the fundamental cause of unemployment is wage and price rigidities (Higgs, 1995). He said that once full employment is reached then markets can work freely. He also claimed in his book âThe General Theory of Employment, Interest and Moneyâ that socialization of investment incorporating public-private partnership, might be needed to secure full employment (Keynes, 1936). He opposed to an economy which generated far less than it could, a problem which left millions of people unemployed in economies where work is not only social status, but source of revenue. The significant impact of Keynesianism throughout the World War II is widely attributed to the obliteration of mass employment, which occasioned in an extreme influence and spread of Keynesianism connecting to the governmentâs duty of upholding full employment.( (Higgs, 1995) For example, in 1944, the UK government espoused a plan towards ensuring a âhigh and stable level of employmentâ as a part of its employment policy (Jstor.org, 2012). In the USA, the Employment Act of 1946 displayed the commitment of the Federal Government in embracing measures to accomplish âmaximum employment, production and purchasing powerâ. The dedications by both the UK and the USA were of ultimate importance concerning the spread and influence of Keynesianism, even though they were lacking the ways of reaching the stated aims of maximum employment (Jstor.org, 2012) When looking at the case of the United Kingdom, Keynes had an opinion that the target 3 per cent of average employment was tremendously optimistic and said that there was no possible harm in putting it into practice. It is obvious that the post-war success enjoyed by the United Kingdom and the United State can be credited to the stabilization policy of Keynesianism. James Tobin, the most well-know>
To understand Keynes, it is important to note that unlike most economists nowadays, his key target was to get completely rid of unemployment: the âreal problem, fundamental yet essentially simple is to provide employment for everyone.â His objective for unemployment is âthe sort of level we are facing in wartime less than 1 per cent.â Keynes strongly denied that the fundamental cause of unemployment is wage and price rigidities (Higgs, 1995). He said that once full employment is reached then markets can work freely. He also claimed in his book âThe General Theory of Employment, Interest and Moneyâ that socialization of investment incorporating public-private partnership, might be needed to secure full employment (Keynes, 1936). He opposed to an economy which generated far less than it could, a problem which left millions of people unemployed in economies where work is not only social status, but source of revenue. The significant impact of Keynesianism throughout the World War II is widely attributed to the obliteration of mass employment, which occasioned in an extreme influence and spread of Keynesianism connecting to the governmentâs duty of upholding full employment.( (Higgs, 1995) For example, in 1944, the UK government espoused a plan towards ensuring a âhigh and stable level of employmentâ as a part of its employment policy (Jstor.org, 2012). In the USA, the Employment Act of 1946 displayed the commitment of the Federal Government in embracing measures to accomplish âmaximum employment, production and purchasing powerâ. The dedications by both the UK and the USA were of ultimate importance concerning the spread and influence of Keynesianism, even though they were lacking the ways of reaching the stated aims of maximum employment (Jstor.org, 2012) When looking at the case of the United Kingdom, Keynes had an opinion that the target 3 per cent of average employment was tremendously optimistic and said that there was no possible harm in putting it into practice. It is obvious that the post-war success enjoyed by the United Kingdom and the United State can be credited to the stabilization policy of Keynesianism. James Tobin, the most well-know>
