We can work on Henry Lewis Stimson: The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb (1947) and Gar Alperovitz: Hiroshima: Historians Reassess (1995)

According to Henry Stimson, U.S. Secretary of War during World War II, why did the United States decide that it needed to use atomic bombs against Japan during the war? What were the justifications? In contrast, why have modern historians argued the use of atomic weapons during World War II was unnecessary? Which side has the stronger argument and why?
General advice :
Avoid lengthy quotations. I want to read your analysis, not lengthy space wasting quotations from the documents. It is only a 2- 3 page paper, so you cannot turn in two pages of quotations and expect a good grade. If you do want to use several quotations, then lengthen your paper to insure you are providing substantial analysis of those quotations.

Do your best to keep it professional and try to avoid moralizing. Rather, use your limited space to focus on providing solid analysis of the assigned reading.

Sample Solution

nterviewees showed their concern about the giant panda. Of those who refused to have the species in their towns, all stated that they do not let the giant panda put in the difficult situation for survival because of unfavourable habitat. Furthermore, a specific question about the extinction of the giant panda was asked to explore students’ attitudes towards the moralistic value. To this question, all interviewees indicated their concerns about the dying out of the giant panda. Two students stated that the giant panda should not become extinct owing to its intrinsic value as one species, as can be seen in the answer “they belong to the earth”. Although these two students expressed their moralistic concern, the major reason for the other students might not be moralistic. The major reason why eight students opposed the extinction of the giant panda was the fact that the giant panda is an endemic species and the national animal. Negativistic value The ecological feature of the giant panda was the key to understand the negativistic value towards the species. Nine of ten Chinese students did not show their fear of the giant pandas. Some of them chose the word for or the image of the species such as “friendship”, “friendly”, “warm”, “close to people”, and “community”. When they were asked the reason for using those words, they explained that the giant panda “eat only bamboo”, “never attack people”, “stay at mountains”, and “do not compete with people for food resource”. Based on these characteristic of the giant panda, nine students seemed not to express their fear. On the other hand, one student mentioned that giant pandas attack people “when they get furious”. Discussion and conclusion This study set out to explore Chinese student’s attitudes towards the giant panda and its result showed that generally students have strong favourable attitudes. It was also shown that the major values contributing to their attitudes were utilitarian, naturalistic, ecologistic-scientific, symbolic, humanistic, and moralistic. The most significant value among ten Chinese students at Univer>

Is this question part of your assignment?

Place order