Instructions
Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. At a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.
- Describe the health care problem or issue you selected for use in Assessment 2 (from the Assessment Topic Areas | Transcript media piece) and provide details about it.
- To explore your chosen topic, you should use the first four steps of the Socratic Problem-Solving Approach to aid your critical thinking. This approach was introduced in the second assessment.
- Identify possible causes for the problem or issue.
- Use scholarly information to explain the health care problem or issue.
- Identify at least three scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles about the topic.
o You may use articles you found while working on Assessment 2 or you may search the Capella Library for other articles.
o You may find the applicable Undergraduate Library Research Guide helpful in your search. - Assess the credibility of the information sources.
- Assess the relevance of the information sources.
- Analyze the problem or issue.
o Describe the setting or context for the problems or issues.
o Describe why the problem or issue is important to you.
o Identify groups of people affected by the problem or issue. - Discuss potential solutions for the problem or issue.
o Compare your opinion with other opinions you find in sources from the Capella Library.
o Provide the pros and cons for one of the solutions you are proposing. - Analyze the ethical implications if the potential solution (the one for which you provide pros and cons) were to be implemented.
o Discuss the pros and cons of implementing the proposed solution from an ethical principle point of view.
o Provide examples from the literature to support the points you are making. - Describe what would be necessary to implement the proposed solution.
Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like:
⢠Assessment 3 Example [PDF].
Additional Requirements - Length: At least 4â6 typed, double-spaced pages, not including the title page and reference page.
- Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
- APA Template: Use the APA Style Paper Template [DOCX] as the paper format and the APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOC] for guidance.
- Written communication: Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.
- Using outside sources: Integrate information from outside sources into academic writing by appropriately quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, following APA style.
- References: Integrate information from outside sources to include at least three scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles and three in-text citations within the paper.
- APA format: Follow current APA guidelines for in-text citations of outside sources in the body of your paper and also on the reference page.
Organize your paper using the following structure and headings:
⢠Title page. A separate page.
⢠Introduction. A brief one-paragraph statement about the purpose of the paper.
⢠Elements of the problem/issue. Identify the elements of the problem or issue or question.
⢠Analysis. Analyze, define, and frame the problem or issue.
⢠Considering options. Consider solutions, responses, or answers.
⢠Solution. Choose a solution, response, or answer.
⢠Ethical implications. Ethical implications of implementing the solution.
⢠Implementation. Implementation of the potential solution.
⢠Conclusion. One paragraph.
Sample Solution
This page of the article has 1734 words. Download the full form above. One of the solicitations from the working together organizations to the convenience and UX strategies were they should fit the Scrum advancement rhyme. To comprehend dexterous improvement, we need to comprehend what it breaks with. On the off chance that a product venture adjusts a conventional advancement structure for example the cascade approach, the prerequisites must be characterized forthright. These days, this can be an issue, since prerequisites for an item can change starting with one day then onto the next, new advancements can develop, and so on. This potential involves issues with adherence to cutoff times and can wind up causing huge surprising costs. In The Agile Samurai, Rasmusson et al. (2012) express that in an improvement procedure: ⢠You can’t accumulate every one of the prerequisites in advance. ⢠The prerequisites you do assemble will change. ⢠There is in every case more to do than time and cash will permit. The Agile Samurai, Rasmusson et al. (2012) Three, light-footed improvement procedures consider. Coordinated programming improvement procedures are a group of advancement structures for example Scrum and XP. These improvement systems share a typical way of thinking, expressed in Agile Manifesto (2001). The four primary qualities are: ⢠Individuals and collaborations over procedures and devices ⢠Working programming over far reaching documentation ⢠Customer joint effort over agreement exchange ⢠Responding to change over after an arrangement (Deft Manifesto, 2001) By utilizing a deft improvement structure, an organization can react to moving necessities in the undertaking. Besides, the coordinated effort between the improvement group and the client ends up straightforward since they work together firmly, joined with the probability of having the client giving proceeds with info and input to the advancement procedure. In late 2013, Ambler and partners conveyed a study concerning i.a. customary and nimble programming advancement. The review had 173 respondents. The outcome from the overview uncovered that activities utilizing a customary improvement approach were multiple times more frequently to fall flat than undertakings following a light-footed advancement approach, see Figure 1. Figure 1. The pace of effective, tested and bombed extends in nimble versus conventional projects(Ambler et al., 2014). A few distinctive deft improvement structures exist. Commitment 2 in this proposal criticized Scrum to be the most loved lithe structure utilized inside the Danish business. Scrum is besides the advancement system utilized inside the cooperative organizations. 1.2.1. SCRUM Scrum is an iterative and gradual structure, created to improve consistency and hazard control. (Sutherland and Schwaber, 2011) Scrum has been utilized in programming advancement since the start of 1990’s. It is critical to take note of, that Scrum isn’t a procedure or system for building items, yet a structure where it is conceivable to apply various procedures and strategies inside. (Sutherland and Schwaber, 2011) The reason for Scrum is that product improvement can be a convoluted and flighty procedure. [REF] Hence, the establishment of Scrum depends on induction, implying that learning should originate as a matter of fact, and choices ought to be founded on what is known. [REF] Figure 2 shows the Scrum procedure. Figure 2. The Scrum system [REF] When applying the Scrum system, you have a Scrum Team comprising of three jobs: the item proprietor, the scrum ace and the improvement group. The system has four functions: run arranging; day by day scrum(daily scrum); run audit; review and three jobs: item proprietor; scrum ace; the advancement group. . The essential curio in Scrum is the Product Backlog. This excess is a gathering of necessities, frequently expressed in client stories. The accumulation is the venture’s just source to the necessities. During Sprint arranging the improvement group maneuvers excess things into the run build-up. Regularly a dash length is between two to about a month (all the working together organizations have run of three weeks span). The essential function in Scrum is the every day Scrum (day by day stand-up), where the group have 15 minutes to discuss progress and snags in the work. Toward the finish of the run, the entire group initially plays out a dash audit, regularly together with all partners, the objective is to have a possibly shippable item increase that has been tried and is useful. To settle the run, the group has a dash review to examine itself and create an arrangement for upgrades, which can be executed during the following run. 1.3. Convenience AND UX When working with convenience and UX it is imperative to have a mutual comprehension and establishment to the thought of particularly UX. Various methodologies exist with regards to recognize convenience and UX. Be that as it may, all methodologies concur upon UX beginning from convenience, and the change from ease of use towards UX incorporates a progressively positive, all encompassing, non-instrumental and indulgent view. [REF] 1.3.1. Ease of use Ease of use is by the ISO 9241 standard characterized as: “The degree to which an item can be utilized by indicated clients to accomplish determined objectives with viability, proficiency and fulfillment in a predetermined setting of utilization.” [REF] Ease of use building centers around the convenience and learnability, proficiency, memorability, mistakes and fulfillment of an item and on how the cooperation can be estimated. (Nielsen, 1994) Usability regularly centers around executing tests with the emphasis on evacuating substandard and non-usable components from an item, therefore it is very hazard situated. [REF] Focus is on the effectiveness of utilizing the item as opposed to seeing how individuals experience the item. Henceforth ease of use techniques have an increasingly quantitative nature and incorporate AB-testing, execution tests, ease of use assessments, and so forth. [REF] 1.3.2. Client EXPERIENCE (UX) Despite the fact that it is concurred that UX is beginning from ease of use, no regular meaning of UX is settled upon. UX is by the ISO XX standard characterized as: “Individual’s discernments and reactions coming about because of the utilization and additionally foreseen utilization of an item, framework or administration” Furthermore, it is noticed that: “Client Experience incorporates every one of the clients’ feelings, convictions, inclinations, recognitions, physical and mental reactions, practices and achievements that happen previously, during and after use”. (ISO, 2010) A subsequent note states: “Client experience is an outcome of brand picture, introduction, usefulness, framework execution, intuitive conduct and assistive abilities of the intelligent framework the client’s inner and physical state coming about because of related involvements, demeanors, aptitudes and character, and the setting of utilization”. (ISO, 2010) In the User Experience White Paper by Roto et al. (2011) the term client experience is characterized as: “An experience with a framework that has a start and an end. It alludes to a general assignment of how individuals have encountered (action word) a time of experiencing a framework”. When managing the idea of UX three fundamental elements can be grouped: 1. Setting: It is of significance to have at the top of the priority list, that UX may change when the setting changes. 2. Client: The client is dynamic, thus UX is dynamic. 3. Framework: The UX properties planned into the item is significant. (Roto et al., 2011) A fourth factor to have as a top priority, when working with UX, is as referenced in the ISO standard and by the Roto et al. (2011), the time viewpoint. UX depend on the client’s feelings and dispositions towards for example the item, consequently UX strategies attempt to get to these angles and have a progressively subjective nature. Instances of strategies could be relevant request, center gatherings, meet, and so on. [REF] 1.3.3. Ease of use AND UX IN THIS PROJECT Moczarny et al. (2012) expressed that UX and ease of use can identify with one another in three alternate points of view, see Figure 4. Figure 4. Three alternate points of view on how ease of use and UX identify with one another. (Moczarny et al., 2012) The meaning of UX in the present work is that UX is a more extensive, prevalent region, one may state umbrella, which incorporates ease of use, see first point of view in Figure 4. This definition is in consistency with how Radiometer functions with ease of use and UX for example medical attendants have a sense of safety (have a decent UX) when utilizing the gadget because of the effectiveness of utilization (great ease of use). 1.3.4. Ease of use AND UX METHODS The quantity of ease of use and UX techniques is very high. Ferre et al. (2005) tallied 95 distinct strategies and procedures. This is too enormous an example to consider working with and some of them cover very a lot. I in this way utilize the rundown of strategies introduced at usabilitynet.org, since the assortment in these techniques is progressively broad. This rundown from usabilitynet.org: ⢠Affinity outlining ⢠Allocate errands ⢠Attitude surveys ⢠Brainstorming ⢠Card arranging ⢠Competitor examination ⢠Context of utilization examination ⢠Contextual request ⢠Cost-advantage examination ⢠Critical occurrence examination ⢠Design rules ⢠Diagnostic assessment ⢠Evaluate model ⢠Evaluating a current framework ⢠Expert assessment ⢠Field study ⢠Focus gatherings ⢠Getting started ⢠Heuristic assessment ⢠Interviews ⢠Observation of clients ⢠Parallel structure ⢠Participatory assessment ⢠Paper prototyping ⢠Patterns ⢠Performance testing ⢠Planning convenience ⢠Pleasure ⢠Post discharge testing ⢠Prototyping ⢠Questionnaires ⢠Rapid prototyping ⢠Remote testing ⢠Requirements meeting ⢠Scenarios of utilization ⢠Stakeholder meeting ⢠Storyboarding ⢠Style guides ⢠Subjective assessment ⢠Surveys ⢠Task examination ⢠Usability testing ⢠Use cases ⢠User fulfillment ⢠Wizard of OZ (usabilitynet.org, 2015) To limit the rundown and>
This page of the article has 1734 words. Download the full form above. One of the solicitations from the working together organizations to the convenience and UX strategies were they should fit the Scrum advancement rhyme. To comprehend dexterous improvement, we need to comprehend what it breaks with. On the off chance that a product venture adjusts a conventional advancement structure for example the cascade approach, the prerequisites must be characterized forthright. These days, this can be an issue, since prerequisites for an item can change starting with one day then onto the next, new advancements can develop, and so on. This potential involves issues with adherence to cutoff times and can wind up causing huge surprising costs. In The Agile Samurai, Rasmusson et al. (2012) express that in an improvement procedure: ⢠You can’t accumulate every one of the prerequisites in advance. ⢠The prerequisites you do assemble will change. ⢠There is in every case more to do than time and cash will permit. The Agile Samurai, Rasmusson et al. (2012) Three, light-footed improvement procedures consider. Coordinated programming improvement procedures are a group of advancement structures for example Scrum and XP. These improvement systems share a typical way of thinking, expressed in Agile Manifesto (2001). The four primary qualities are: ⢠Individuals and collaborations over procedures and devices ⢠Working programming over far reaching documentation ⢠Customer joint effort over agreement exchange ⢠Responding to change over after an arrangement (Deft Manifesto, 2001) By utilizing a deft improvement structure, an organization can react to moving necessities in the undertaking. Besides, the coordinated effort between the improvement group and the client ends up straightforward since they work together firmly, joined with the probability of having the client giving proceeds with info and input to the advancement procedure. In late 2013, Ambler and partners conveyed a study concerning i.a. customary and nimble programming advancement. The review had 173 respondents. The outcome from the overview uncovered that activities utilizing a customary improvement approach were multiple times more frequently to fall flat than undertakings following a light-footed advancement approach, see Figure 1. Figure 1. The pace of effective, tested and bombed extends in nimble versus conventional projects(Ambler et al., 2014). A few distinctive deft improvement structures exist. Commitment 2 in this proposal criticized Scrum to be the most loved lithe structure utilized inside the Danish business. Scrum is besides the advancement system utilized inside the cooperative organizations. 1.2.1. SCRUM Scrum is an iterative and gradual structure, created to improve consistency and hazard control. (Sutherland and Schwaber, 2011) Scrum has been utilized in programming advancement since the start of 1990’s. It is critical to take note of, that Scrum isn’t a procedure or system for building items, yet a structure where it is conceivable to apply various procedures and strategies inside. (Sutherland and Schwaber, 2011) The reason for Scrum is that product improvement can be a convoluted and flighty procedure. [REF] Hence, the establishment of Scrum depends on induction, implying that learning should originate as a matter of fact, and choices ought to be founded on what is known. [REF] Figure 2 shows the Scrum procedure. Figure 2. The Scrum system [REF] When applying the Scrum system, you have a Scrum Team comprising of three jobs: the item proprietor, the scrum ace and the improvement group. The system has four functions: run arranging; day by day scrum(daily scrum); run audit; review and three jobs: item proprietor; scrum ace; the advancement group. . The essential curio in Scrum is the Product Backlog. This excess is a gathering of necessities, frequently expressed in client stories. The accumulation is the venture’s just source to the necessities. During Sprint arranging the improvement group maneuvers excess things into the run build-up. Regularly a dash length is between two to about a month (all the working together organizations have run of three weeks span). The essential function in Scrum is the every day Scrum (day by day stand-up), where the group have 15 minutes to discuss progress and snags in the work. Toward the finish of the run, the entire group initially plays out a dash audit, regularly together with all partners, the objective is to have a possibly shippable item increase that has been tried and is useful. To settle the run, the group has a dash review to examine itself and create an arrangement for upgrades, which can be executed during the following run. 1.3. Convenience AND UX When working with convenience and UX it is imperative to have a mutual comprehension and establishment to the thought of particularly UX. Various methodologies exist with regards to recognize convenience and UX. Be that as it may, all methodologies concur upon UX beginning from convenience, and the change from ease of use towards UX incorporates a progressively positive, all encompassing, non-instrumental and indulgent view. [REF] 1.3.1. Ease of use Ease of use is by the ISO 9241 standard characterized as: “The degree to which an item can be utilized by indicated clients to accomplish determined objectives with viability, proficiency and fulfillment in a predetermined setting of utilization.” [REF] Ease of use building centers around the convenience and learnability, proficiency, memorability, mistakes and fulfillment of an item and on how the cooperation can be estimated. (Nielsen, 1994) Usability regularly centers around executing tests with the emphasis on evacuating substandard and non-usable components from an item, therefore it is very hazard situated. [REF] Focus is on the effectiveness of utilizing the item as opposed to seeing how individuals experience the item. Henceforth ease of use techniques have an increasingly quantitative nature and incorporate AB-testing, execution tests, ease of use assessments, and so forth. [REF] 1.3.2. Client EXPERIENCE (UX) Despite the fact that it is concurred that UX is beginning from ease of use, no regular meaning of UX is settled upon. UX is by the ISO XX standard characterized as: “Individual’s discernments and reactions coming about because of the utilization and additionally foreseen utilization of an item, framework or administration” Furthermore, it is noticed that: “Client Experience incorporates every one of the clients’ feelings, convictions, inclinations, recognitions, physical and mental reactions, practices and achievements that happen previously, during and after use”. (ISO, 2010) A subsequent note states: “Client experience is an outcome of brand picture, introduction, usefulness, framework execution, intuitive conduct and assistive abilities of the intelligent framework the client’s inner and physical state coming about because of related involvements, demeanors, aptitudes and character, and the setting of utilization”. (ISO, 2010) In the User Experience White Paper by Roto et al. (2011) the term client experience is characterized as: “An experience with a framework that has a start and an end. It alludes to a general assignment of how individuals have encountered (action word) a time of experiencing a framework”. When managing the idea of UX three fundamental elements can be grouped: 1. Setting: It is of significance to have at the top of the priority list, that UX may change when the setting changes. 2. Client: The client is dynamic, thus UX is dynamic. 3. Framework: The UX properties planned into the item is significant. (Roto et al., 2011) A fourth factor to have as a top priority, when working with UX, is as referenced in the ISO standard and by the Roto et al. (2011), the time viewpoint. UX depend on the client’s feelings and dispositions towards for example the item, consequently UX strategies attempt to get to these angles and have a progressively subjective nature. Instances of strategies could be relevant request, center gatherings, meet, and so on. [REF] 1.3.3. Ease of use AND UX IN THIS PROJECT Moczarny et al. (2012) expressed that UX and ease of use can identify with one another in three alternate points of view, see Figure 4. Figure 4. Three alternate points of view on how ease of use and UX identify with one another. (Moczarny et al., 2012) The meaning of UX in the present work is that UX is a more extensive, prevalent region, one may state umbrella, which incorporates ease of use, see first point of view in Figure 4. This definition is in consistency with how Radiometer functions with ease of use and UX for example medical attendants have a sense of safety (have a decent UX) when utilizing the gadget because of the effectiveness of utilization (great ease of use). 1.3.4. Ease of use AND UX METHODS The quantity of ease of use and UX techniques is very high. Ferre et al. (2005) tallied 95 distinct strategies and procedures. This is too enormous an example to consider working with and some of them cover very a lot. I in this way utilize the rundown of strategies introduced at usabilitynet.org, since the assortment in these techniques is progressively broad. This rundown from usabilitynet.org: ⢠Affinity outlining ⢠Allocate errands ⢠Attitude surveys ⢠Brainstorming ⢠Card arranging ⢠Competitor examination ⢠Context of utilization examination ⢠Contextual request ⢠Cost-advantage examination ⢠Critical occurrence examination ⢠Design rules ⢠Diagnostic assessment ⢠Evaluate model ⢠Evaluating a current framework ⢠Expert assessment ⢠Field study ⢠Focus gatherings ⢠Getting started ⢠Heuristic assessment ⢠Interviews ⢠Observation of clients ⢠Parallel structure ⢠Participatory assessment ⢠Paper prototyping ⢠Patterns ⢠Performance testing ⢠Planning convenience ⢠Pleasure ⢠Post discharge testing ⢠Prototyping ⢠Questionnaires ⢠Rapid prototyping ⢠Remote testing ⢠Requirements meeting ⢠Scenarios of utilization ⢠Stakeholder meeting ⢠Storyboarding ⢠Style guides ⢠Subjective assessment ⢠Surveys ⢠Task examination ⢠Usability testing ⢠Use cases ⢠User fulfillment ⢠Wizard of OZ (usabilitynet.org, 2015) To limit the rundown and>
