ane Eyre: Last page response to “Read the article regarding Jane Eyreâs ending. In a mature response, write your thoughts about whether you agree with the viewpoint shared in the article or not. State specific reasons and share your imagined ending, if it differs from the actual one in the story.
Sample Solution
e. Carlin had adopted the philosophy that a comicâs job was to find the line and wildly leap across it. This philosophy is what lead up to the famous âobscenity vs indecentâ case known as FCC vs. Pacifica. Carlin had a segment referred to as âdirty wordsâ that lasted approximately 12 minutes and included many explicit terms typically thought of as âdirtyâ. After performing this segment in Milwaukee, Carlin was arrested July 1972 for disobeying obscenity laws but the case was later dismissed citing that Carlinâs language was indecent but not obscene. A little over a year later, Carlinâs âdirty wordsâ segment was played on a Pacifica affiliate radio at around 2:00p. John H. Douglas heard the segment while driving home that afternoon. Douglass complained to the FCC since his 15 year old son was in the car when the segment started and he was offended that his son had been exposed to such crass language. In his letter, Douglass lamented the fact that this âobscene languageâ was played at a peak time of day when any unsuspecting child could accidentally tune in and be exposed to it. Thus began the FCC vs. Pacifica trial. While this was the only recorded complaint Pacifica received, the FCC looked into Douglassâ complaint and in 15 months gave a ruling. Initially, the FCC reprimanded Pacifica for allowing an âobsceneâ segment to be aired on the radio at a peak time of the day. The FCC argued that the language used in Carlinâs segment was offensive, though the FCC did not believe it was obscene, and went against the statute prohibiting the broadcast of obscene, indecent and profane language. With this in mind, the FCC set a specific time of day where these The FCC issued the reprimand to Pacifica, granted the complaint, but did not put a sanction on Pacifica at that time. The FCC did however, note that, should any more complaints be received, the FCC would tak>
e. Carlin had adopted the philosophy that a comicâs job was to find the line and wildly leap across it. This philosophy is what lead up to the famous âobscenity vs indecentâ case known as FCC vs. Pacifica. Carlin had a segment referred to as âdirty wordsâ that lasted approximately 12 minutes and included many explicit terms typically thought of as âdirtyâ. After performing this segment in Milwaukee, Carlin was arrested July 1972 for disobeying obscenity laws but the case was later dismissed citing that Carlinâs language was indecent but not obscene. A little over a year later, Carlinâs âdirty wordsâ segment was played on a Pacifica affiliate radio at around 2:00p. John H. Douglas heard the segment while driving home that afternoon. Douglass complained to the FCC since his 15 year old son was in the car when the segment started and he was offended that his son had been exposed to such crass language. In his letter, Douglass lamented the fact that this âobscene languageâ was played at a peak time of day when any unsuspecting child could accidentally tune in and be exposed to it. Thus began the FCC vs. Pacifica trial. While this was the only recorded complaint Pacifica received, the FCC looked into Douglassâ complaint and in 15 months gave a ruling. Initially, the FCC reprimanded Pacifica for allowing an âobsceneâ segment to be aired on the radio at a peak time of the day. The FCC argued that the language used in Carlinâs segment was offensive, though the FCC did not believe it was obscene, and went against the statute prohibiting the broadcast of obscene, indecent and profane language. With this in mind, the FCC set a specific time of day where these The FCC issued the reprimand to Pacifica, granted the complaint, but did not put a sanction on Pacifica at that time. The FCC did however, note that, should any more complaints be received, the FCC would tak>
