The background to and findings of the Plessy v Ferguson Supreme Court case.
The context and the findings of the Brown v Board of Education Supreme Court case, particularly what the
court meant by “inherently unequal”.
The arguments used by the White Citizen’s Council
- Using the reading and video on Plessy v Ferguson, Brown v Board of Education, and “The White Citizen’s
Council: How Can We Educate Our Children”, (and other material from module that you find useful) answer the
following two questions:
Explain how the Brown v Board of Education case was a refutation of the the Supreme Court’s conclusion in
Plessy v Ferguson (300-350 words long).
What argument(s) did the White Citizen’s Council make to resist the desegregation of public schools mandated
by Brown v Board of Education? (300-350 words long)
Sample Solution
under a particular pay level â with one curve. In contrast to Oregon and Tennessee, which make a two-year training at the junior college free, Governor Cuomo has extended the idea to most four-year state schools in New York. Free school â How lucky for New York inhabitants. Or then again would it be advisable for me to state, how tragic? New York inhabitants will currently have the capacity to run in huge numbers to foundations that are now packed and produce troubling outcomes. The default rate on understudy credits at New York state funded colleges and universities was 9.3% for the 2012 companion. Whatâs more, the finish rate at New York junior colleges is just 20.6%. So how about we perceive how this will function. We will urge understudies to go to a school where just a little measure of entering understudies procure a degree. Whatâs more, obviously, we wonât probably prevent understudies from taking out an understudy advance. Probably not! The expense of participation as determined by the school and directed by the U.S. Bureau of Education far exceeds educational cost and incorporates food and lodging, transportation and the sky is the limit from there. Furthermore, schools canât disallow understudies from obtaining more than the expense of educational cost. The outcome? Understudies will enlist at a âfree schoolâ and obtain cash for the expense of participation. At that point, they will drop out and have an understudy advance â yet no aptitudes. Splendid. Then, is the âfree schoolâ truly free? Obviously not. State funded training is supported essentially by property charge. So expenses will go up and all property proprietors â regardless of whether they have school age kids or not â will, truth be told, pay for the free school. No, let me revamp that. They will pay for the free educational cost while prospective school dropouts use understudy advances. At that point, when the understudies going to âfreeâ school default on their understudy credit, the citizen will indeed bear the weight.>
under a particular pay level â with one curve. In contrast to Oregon and Tennessee, which make a two-year training at the junior college free, Governor Cuomo has extended the idea to most four-year state schools in New York. Free school â How lucky for New York inhabitants. Or then again would it be advisable for me to state, how tragic? New York inhabitants will currently have the capacity to run in huge numbers to foundations that are now packed and produce troubling outcomes. The default rate on understudy credits at New York state funded colleges and universities was 9.3% for the 2012 companion. Whatâs more, the finish rate at New York junior colleges is just 20.6%. So how about we perceive how this will function. We will urge understudies to go to a school where just a little measure of entering understudies procure a degree. Whatâs more, obviously, we wonât probably prevent understudies from taking out an understudy advance. Probably not! The expense of participation as determined by the school and directed by the U.S. Bureau of Education far exceeds educational cost and incorporates food and lodging, transportation and the sky is the limit from there. Furthermore, schools canât disallow understudies from obtaining more than the expense of educational cost. The outcome? Understudies will enlist at a âfree schoolâ and obtain cash for the expense of participation. At that point, they will drop out and have an understudy advance â yet no aptitudes. Splendid. Then, is the âfree schoolâ truly free? Obviously not. State funded training is supported essentially by property charge. So expenses will go up and all property proprietors â regardless of whether they have school age kids or not â will, truth be told, pay for the free school. No, let me revamp that. They will pay for the free educational cost while prospective school dropouts use understudy advances. At that point, when the understudies going to âfreeâ school default on their understudy credit, the citizen will indeed bear the weight.>
