We can work on Expert Reports, Depositions & Trials

In a minimum of 550 words, answer the following questions. Sources from peer-reviewed articles are highly encouraged.

  1. In our modern times, cell phones are ubiquitous, and as common as they are, it should be no surprise that cell phones can play a role in computer crimes. Research the types of crimes that are committed via cell phone. Find a case involving a cell phone. What was the outcome? Be sure to provide details of the case. Do you believe that crimes involving the use of cell phones will increase? Please give reasons to support your answers.
  2. Expert consultants are often a part of both criminal and civil investigations. What are the reasons why you may need an expert to assist you with an investigation? Why should credibility of an expert matter?
  3. What is a deposition? Can a deposition be used during the trial process? What would be the need to use a deposition in a trial if the witness is available to testify?

Sample Solution

The Hyper Inflation in Germany dated back to 1914, when World War I was progressing. To persevere through the expense emerged when the war broke out, Germany chose to bankroll the war exclusively by obtaining from neighboring nations. It trust in the triumph of Germany in World War I, which could bring Germany riches and wealth to satisfy the dept. The procedure, be that as it may, was in profound water directly from the earliest starting point. Debilitated by the loss of her partners, Germany gave up on 11 November 1918. At first, Germany accepted that she would have the option to attach asset rich nations in the west and east, and to force repayment on the vanquished Allies. [1] The destruction in WW1 deterred Germany’s association of war economies, however burdened Germany with a gigantic reparation in the Treaty of Versailles that she couldn’t manage. The circumstance crumbled when Germany kept on printing cash with no monetary assets backing it. By late 1919, 48 paper imprints were required to purchase a US dollar.[2] ▲ 50 Mark Note in 1919, Equivalent to 1 US Dollar by then [3] From August 1921, Germany began to purchase outside cash with mark at any price.[4] This quickened the degrading of the imprint. Subsequently, more stamps are required to purchase the remote cash. The conversion scale of the imprint was 50 for every dollar in late 1919 and 1000 for each dollar in 1922, a 20-overlay depreciation. ▲ 1000 Mark Note in 1922, Equivalent to 1 US Dollar by then, a 95 percent downgrading from 1919 [5] By late 1922, Germany was not able reimburse her obligations, making the Mark for all intents and purposes useless. In January 1923, Belgian and French soldiers involved Ruhr, the main mechanical area of Germany, and the reparations were paid by whatever merchandise delivered there. The laborers in Ruhr received the aloof opposition; they left their work and didn’t lift a finger. In any case, the interest in the market was unaltered, with the abatement in the stock, the cost of products and administration will rise, deteriorating swelling. To urge laborers in Ruhr to come back to their occupation, the administration gave enchanting impetuses as too much wages. Per contra, the administration was at that point clung to a quandary. There is no chance to get for the legislature to profit from no place. In this way, the estimation of the Mark must go down. Right then and there, the swelling lost into a hyperinflation. ▲ 50,000,000 Mark for every dollar in mid 1923 and 50,000,000,000,000 Mark for each dollar in late 1923. The hugeness of the money scalars features the degree of the hyperinflation [6][7] The paper cash devaluated as brisk as a wink, making bizarre scenes. The cost of some espresso had multiplied when it was smashed; workers were paid toward the beginning of the day with the goal that they could leave to the market and spend their regularly devaluating paper notes; kids utilized fruitless banknotes as toys, as they were less expensive than genuine toys. Since as the overwhelming circumstance, a few financial specialists had proposed different answers for get to its base. ▲ (left) Children utilized banknotes as toys [8] (right) A crowd of individuals before a supermarket, anxious to spend their money as their cash was losing an incentive when. [9] Karl Helfferich’s proposed including another cash ‘ Roggenmark’, yet it was dismissed in August 1923. A while later, another Rentenmark was given in November 16 1923. Twelve zeros were cut from the costs. The new Rentenmark accomplished a steady money until the passing of the leader of the Reichsbank Rudolf Havenstein on 20 November 1923. The new Rentenmark experienced downgrading thereafter. Date Amount of Rentenmarks available for use Nov 30 1923 500,000,000 Jan 1 1924 1,000,000,000 July 1924 1,800,000,000 ▲ Amount of Rentenmarks available for use somewhere in the range of 1923 and 1924 [10] The messiness was iron out after the execution of a law on August 30 1924, permitting the exchange of 1 trillion imprints to one new Reichsmark, same as a Rentenmark. By 1924, 1 dollar was equivalent to 4 Rentenmarks. A short time later, the administration completed revaluation by raising the conversion standard of the Rentenmark to different monetary forms. The Law on the Revaluation of Mortgages was actualized on 16 July 1925, completing the hyperinflation. Among the all, the white collar class, especially the savers and the laborers, endured the most in the hyperinflation. Savers rely upon the enthusiasm of their reserve funds to win a living. Under hyperinflation, their benefits were consumed. Laborers were blessed enough to have a vocation, yet their wages were useless as the cash cheapened quickly after they were paid. Then again, the least fortunate the most extravagant and had by one way or another profited by the hyperinflation. The least fortunate are for the most part makers, for example, ranchers. Under hyperinflation, they could sell their products at a humongous value, making gigantic benefits. The most extravagant, for the most part business magnates, could pay their credits at a lower cost, improving them off. As found in the abovementioned, the hyperinflation in Germany relied upon the unforgiving disciplines on Germany in the Treaty of Versailles. However without different factors, for example, the overprinting of paper takes note of, the acquisition of outside money with German Mark and the aloof obstruction in Ruhr, it may not prompted such a calamity. Rather than arranging her war financial matters, Germany’s wrong choice brought enormous money related weight to the nation, at last causing the hyperinflation in Germany. Pomposity can be an executioner. Hyper Inflation in Zimbabwe 2008 The hyperinflation in Zimbabwe 2008 is somehow closely resembling the hyperinflation in Germany 1923. Zimbabwe’s pinnacle swelling rate is assessed to be 80 billion percent in November 2008, outperforming the expansion pace of German Mark in 1923. On 18 April 1980, the Republic of Zimbabwe was conceived. In early years, Zimbabwe encountered a solid monetary development, particularly in agrarian yield. Seeing a large portion of the farmlands were in the hand of the white, the administration executed a land change program during the 1990s to redistribute land from the white to the dark. In any case, it worked out that the majority of the farmland went to individuals and authorities with practically no learning about cultivating. This brought about a sharp decrease in farming yield. The economy of Zimbabwe crumbled under the decrease in rural industry, burdening Zimbabwe with obligations, like that Germany endured in the Treaty of Versailles. ▲ Zimbabweans gathering extra wheat for nourishment [11] In the late 1900s, Mugabe, the executive of Zimbabwe, guided soldiers to fight in the Second Congo War. The monetary circumstance was at that point tense, yet the fat hit the fire when significant compensations were given to the administration authorities and armed force. Zimbabwe was answering to the International Monetary Fund of a war cost of $23 million every month. [12] To cover the gigantic war costs, Zimbabwe did what Germany did during the 1920s — printing paper notes with no assets support up. So, the up and coming swelling emergency is inescapable. When the swelling evoked, hyperinflation is just a couple of ink streams away. ▲ A political animation ‘Obama takes a “Note” from Mr. Mugabe’, ridiculing Zimbabwe of overprinting cash to determine her money related emergency [13] As the economy is declining, printing cash turned into a momentary answer for forestalling hyperinflation. Amusingly, the administration attempted to force laws to confine individuals raising the costs of products, halting expansion. Notwithstanding, this makes deficiencies of products which raised the costs. It’s an endless loop. With no achievable arrangements, the expansion rate expanded significantly during the mid-2000s. The pinnacle of hyperinflation happened in November 2008, with a swelling pace of 80 billion % every month. ▲ Zimbabwe swelling rate from 1980 to 2008 [14] What occurred next was equivalent to in Germany 1923. Individuals couldn’t stand to purchase the fundamental products. Snidely, they were perceived as ‘Destitution extremely rich people’, with wages of a billion when a portion of bread cost three billion. The Zimbabwe government in the long run quit utilizing Zimbabwe dollars and adjusted the act of utilizing US dollars. The hyperinflation in Zimbabwe has reached an end. ▲ ‘Neediness very rich people’s in Germany 1923 (left) [14] and in Zimbabwe 2008 (right) [15] ▲ (left) 50,000,000,000,000 German imprint in 1923 [16] and 100,000,000,000,000 Zimbabwe dollars in 2008 (right) [17] ▲ Paper notes were viewed as waste under hyperinflation in Germany 1923 (left) [18] and in Zimbabwe 2008 (right) [19] As appeared in the abovementioned, the hyperinflation in Zimbabwe is somehow like that in Germany 1923. The true reality, seeing what occurred in the hyperinflations, proposing that history continues rehashing itself. In the two cases, the economy fallen when the administration attempted to print cash to reestablish the economy. Plainly individuals have not gained from history, yet they ought to have done as such.>

Is this question part of your assignment?

Place order