Discuss your reading and experience of Religion in American
Sample Solution
identified not only individual threats, but collective threats that are not direct human rights abuses, such as climate change but affect the lives of many individuals (ibid). Human security thus adds to human rights law and establishes a framework of analysis for states and international organisations to ensure the promotion of human rights and democratic values through new actions such as the Responsibility to Protect Doctrine (R2P). This doctrine attempts to legitimise and normalise international intervention when states are unable or unwilling to protect its own citizens (Howard-Hassman, 2012). R2P suggests that sovereignty is not a right, but instead demands states to provide protection and security to their citizens. Even when states have ratified human rights instruments it does not mean they are to prioritise one right over another right. Human security aims to ensure that states do not abuse this power and instead makes sure that all rights of the individual, no matter how trivial, are protected. This is an important element of political science as often law is considered to be the biggest protector of human rights. It further unites diverse states, agencies and NGOs who aim at safeguarding citizensâ rights under international law without having to resort to force. This has proved successful in a many UN peacekeeping operation including Cambodia, El Salvador and Guatemala whereby basic security has helped end conflicts and the destabilisation of many states (United Nations Peacekeeping, n.d.). The narrow view of human security, therefore, advances human rights law as it provides concrete objectives and offers a framework of analysis that directly helps in promoting human rights standards and take new actions to counter new threats. Although human security aims at promoting and protecting individual rights, particularly when states are unwilling or unable to do so, there are criticisms it faces in regard to the extent to which these rights are actually protected. Howard-Hassman (2012) has argued that the human security discourse has the potential to inadvertently undermine the international human rights framework. For instance, R2P can allow for powerful countries to invade countries under the guise of humanitarian intervention. This is all at the expense of human protection and is justified under the pretext of âhuman securityâ. An example includes Libya, where military intervention was used in response to Gaddafiâs planned air strikes upon civilians (Kaldor, 2011). However, âhaving crippled Libyan air capabilitiesâ NATO continued to aim at Gaddafiâs>
identified not only individual threats, but collective threats that are not direct human rights abuses, such as climate change but affect the lives of many individuals (ibid). Human security thus adds to human rights law and establishes a framework of analysis for states and international organisations to ensure the promotion of human rights and democratic values through new actions such as the Responsibility to Protect Doctrine (R2P). This doctrine attempts to legitimise and normalise international intervention when states are unable or unwilling to protect its own citizens (Howard-Hassman, 2012). R2P suggests that sovereignty is not a right, but instead demands states to provide protection and security to their citizens. Even when states have ratified human rights instruments it does not mean they are to prioritise one right over another right. Human security aims to ensure that states do not abuse this power and instead makes sure that all rights of the individual, no matter how trivial, are protected. This is an important element of political science as often law is considered to be the biggest protector of human rights. It further unites diverse states, agencies and NGOs who aim at safeguarding citizensâ rights under international law without having to resort to force. This has proved successful in a many UN peacekeeping operation including Cambodia, El Salvador and Guatemala whereby basic security has helped end conflicts and the destabilisation of many states (United Nations Peacekeeping, n.d.). The narrow view of human security, therefore, advances human rights law as it provides concrete objectives and offers a framework of analysis that directly helps in promoting human rights standards and take new actions to counter new threats. Although human security aims at promoting and protecting individual rights, particularly when states are unwilling or unable to do so, there are criticisms it faces in regard to the extent to which these rights are actually protected. Howard-Hassman (2012) has argued that the human security discourse has the potential to inadvertently undermine the international human rights framework. For instance, R2P can allow for powerful countries to invade countries under the guise of humanitarian intervention. This is all at the expense of human protection and is justified under the pretext of âhuman securityâ. An example includes Libya, where military intervention was used in response to Gaddafiâs planned air strikes upon civilians (Kaldor, 2011). However, âhaving crippled Libyan air capabilitiesâ NATO continued to aim at Gaddafiâs>
