I’m trying to study for my Philosophy course and I need some help to understand this question.

Each of you must post a critique of the Lawler Reading. Be sure to clearly indicate which Luddite view you are critiquing.

In this article Lawler presents views of different anti-Democratic Liberation Theory thinkers (LUDDITES are anti- Democratic Liberation Theory thinkers) (see my Lawler NOTES for a breakdown of LUDDITE views). Which of those different views do you find most flawed or most correct and why? Quote Lawler article please.

Each of you on the team should provide a short paragraph (1/3 to a half page, longer is okay, shorter will lose points) discussing one of the LUDDITE criticisms of Democratic Liberation Theory. In that paragraph, state what the Luddite criticism is and then say if you agree or not and explain why you agree or not.

Your paragraph should look like this:

Luddites view here. Agree or not. Why agree or not. Give some extra examples from life that reinforce your assessment. (1/3 to a half page) (Quote Lawler article please, but not more than one sentence: if you quote more then your paragraph should be more than half a page)

HINT: if you choose a passage you agree with, you must work much harder, giving examples that really grab attention, otherwise, your critique will sound dull, just head nodding. Better to look for passage or view you do not agree with & say why you do not agree.