”
For this assignment, you will prepare a PowerPoint Presentation. For help in using this tool, review the PowerPoint Tutorial located under your weekly resources.AssignmentYour task this week is to prepare a PowerPoint presentation for an undergraduate psychology research methods course in which you synthesize and evaluate key components and principles of case study research. To do so, you will need to locate at least two peer-review articles in which the researchers used a case study design. You will use these studies as well as three peer-reviewed articles related to the topic you submitted in Week 1, to help illustrate points throughout your presentation.The presentation should critically demonstrate the following:Identify the strengths, challenges, assumptions, and limitations of the design.Appraise the role of the researcher in this qualitative design method. Note any potential ethical considerations.Generate sample research question(s) based upon your topic choice from Week 1 that would be appropriate for this design, justifying your questions.Define the essential components of case study design, and explain how these components fit within the overall framework of this design. Incorporate appropriate animations, transitions, and graphics as well as “speaker notes” for each slide. The speaker notes may be comprised of brief paragraphs or bulleted lists.Support your presentation with at least five scholarly resources. In addition to these specified resources, other appropriate scholarly resources may be included.Length: 10-12 slides (with a separate reference slide)Notes Length: 200-300 words for each slideBe sure to include citations for quotations and paraphrases with references in APA format and style where appropriate. Save the file as PPT with the correct course code information.Week one topic below:Overview of the research topic on clinical healthFor research participants and researchers alike, a narrative inquiry is a pervasive structure with that they understand and portray the meanings and experiences of events, accounting for their conducts and behavior of others, and disclose themselves to others in a manner where they would wish to be seen. Besides, in doing this, the clinical researchers depict something of their social world structure. Therefore, for the reasons, the narratives, which individuals tell, offer important information concerning their experience in connection to social life and identity. Clinical researchers offer the structured approach in carrying out narrative analysis, which accounts for the means where individuals position themselves via narrating stories to the audience in the wider social life context (Bardou & Le Ray, 2013). The approach is epitomized by employing data from the research of the life of a family among the older persons who narrate stories o their parents. The approach in the narrative, which incorporates social and personal stories, is important for psychologists who desire to comprehend the identity and social life influence on the experience of people in the daily issues like being a male or being in the family or for specific issues like life-threatening traumatic and illness experience.Describe a narrative research methodNarrative research is the term, which subsumes the group of practices, which in turn depend on the spoken or written visual representation or the words of people. The approaches concentrate on people’s lives told through their narratives. The stress in such practices is in the narrative, typically both how and what is narrated. Therefore, narrative research may be regarded as both the research method within itself and the phenomenon under research (Bardou & Le Ray, 2013). The narrative methods may be regarded as the real realm measures, which are suitable if real life issues are examined. In the basic linear practice, they encompass research of the single individual experiences embracing the life stories and investigating the learned importance of the individual experiences.Nevertheless, in many cases, an individual will be developing the aggregate of the narratives in every bearing on the others. Narrative research designed by the audience validation. It is an important part of the social science examination, however, cannot always be alone for support and evidence in the report conclusions. If or not it is a part of the strong presentation or if it is the stand-alone part of the study, it has to be established on its merits as an individual encounter and the interpretation (Dwyer & Emerald, 2016). The main question emerges as to the story accuracy looked at independently although it should be perceived in its context of socio-cultural. The narrative provides an individual view of one have to be accessed on its merits.The three ways where one could collect relevant information concerning the individual applying the narrative methodThese include journals, autobiography, interviewing and recording, email and text. Narrative applied in clinical purposes like a therapeutic application of biography and autobiography. The influence of the story to heal is highlighted in many peer-reviewed articles (Dwyer & Emerald, 2016). The methods applied in obtaining narrative data include recording and interviewing (Video or audio) is the information collecting strategies regularly applied in human and health services to gather narrative data. Drawing, photography, creative non-fiction, painting, and journals, the other method applied to gain narrative data via the use of text, or email. The information gathering modalities can be specifically appropriate in collecting the personal stories and experiences of susceptible populations who are using the media like young adults and in the sensitive topic like sexual activity, mental illness among people with sexually transmitted infections or substance use where participants can view the face-to-face experience as threatening, objectionable, or stigmatizing (Grbich, 2015). The benefits of using a narrative research methodNarrative research has benefited from a clinical study and the participant. The clinical narratives tellers develop stories about diagnosis, physical symptoms, and progression via medical treatment in the way that permits the experience to be known by the listener and the teller. Serious infections also offer the substance to create the story for the aim of telling family and friends about the events related to medical care. The narratives assist in repairing the mental and physical damage, which infections have to perform to the body (Russell & Wiese-Bjornstal, 2017). Therapeutic is telling stories concerning the experiences of infections. The power of narrative method lies in its intense flexibility. It permits administrators to customize the review contents according to the type of work, context, employment length or other aspects, which appear appropriate. It provides a flexible theoretical outline compared to certain essentialist practices that tie identity to an unchangeable character like race, gender, religion, or ethnicity. The method accepts that everybody subscribes to the crisscrossing network at times conflicting stories permitting the probability of exploring inconsistencies in translated texts or emails (Russell & Wiese-Bjornstal, 2017). For instance, other than applying the polarizing concepts of domesticating and foreignizing strategies as the outline, narrative research method permits most translators to apply a combination of many strategies (Grbich, 2015). Other than describing them as anomalies or skimming over discrepancies, narrative research method permits clinical researchers to embrace them as proof of the many factors of their complex, to shift story identities that they draw on the time they interpret or translate.ResistanceResistance is the other key benefit of narrative research method because of the equal attention this provides to questions of resistance and dominance. For instance, due to its tendency to concentrates on abstract, repeated, systemic conduct privileges strong socialization patterns into which conduct and tends to polish over many people and group tries to undermine dominant patterns and current social and supporting dogma. The method accepts that there are dominant stories in any provided society, besides it identifies that these may either be rejected or accepted and undermined through offering alternative ways of narratives (Wu & Chu, 2015). The resistance embracing that has attracted many researchers to apply the narrative research approach in exploring the job of activist interpreters and translators.Real-life experiencesAnother significant benefit of narrative research method is its concentration on interpreters and translators as the real-life people other than the theoretical abstractions as applied in the clinical research (Grbich, 2015). The method concentrates on real-life experiences, specific, permitting researchers to illustrate translational options in association to wider political and social contexts without having to lose the sight of an individual email, event, text, and actor. DynamismNarrative research method permits researchers to look at interpreting and translation activities in dynamic than the inert terms because of its embeddedness acceptance of the actor in associations that shift over the space and time. It may be helpful when looking at phenomena like the comparative or retranslations source status and the target texts. The narrative research approach permits clinical researchers to research the full complexity in the translation history not trying them to change the canonical version in the source text or email (Grbich, 2015). The narrative research method is flexible and accessible practice in accepting inequalities in health and health that might be applied widely by the health psychologists. Besides, narrative psychology deals with the methods and ontological matters. Another benefit of the narrative research approach is it does not develop the objectivity illusion as in the case of the systems of rating.Limitations and challenges of narrative research methodNarratives have common challenges and limitations with some review approaches, which depend on the process of end year. They base on both capabilities of parties to remember what is happening over the whole year and in summarizing the events of the year at a time after having the facts. The major limitation of the narrative research is it is highly intensive and specialized approach where there are few rigorously performed examples in literature (Dwyer & Emerald, 2016). There is also a limitation of quantifying that always-present clinical researchers with serious issues, which concerns with evaluating the comparability. The challenge is that by applying the ratified story as a means for change, the present subversion may be running through the earlier indifferent institution. Another challenge experienced in narrative research can be not controlling for essential aspects of the study.ConclusionNarrative research is an important and useful means of doing and theorizing research to the domain of exercise and health psychology. It must not be practiced since it is fashionable or new. Principled, informed, and responsible options should be made by clinical researchers and applied specialists about when and why they could involve with narrative research or inquiry must they wish to perform it.