This assignment is designed to develop your understanding of the opportunities related to e-commerce.
For this assignment, you need to do the items that follow. Don’t worry if some of the requirements seem
improbable. They are designed for an extreme solution that forces one to consider a broad range of e-
commerce possibilities.
- Make up a company. While it can be any type of company, the assignment may be more valuable if you
pick a company thatâs relevant to your area of interest.
Your company cannot have any employees, other than managers that strategize, manage, negotiate, and
make contracts (they canât do anything else).
Next, identify about the many and various needs your company needs if it is to succeed. These needs
must meet all of your company’s needs–not just those related to MIS.
The introductory paragraph needs to include your company’s departments, and the goods it sells and/or
the services it provides. This paragraph will provide part of the foundation for grading the paper. The
departments need to be sufficient for the company, and the e-commerce solutions need to meet your
company’s comprehensive needs. Your paper should include no more than one brief paragraph about
your company. Mention of your employees should be very brief or absent.
- List e-commerce solutions for your company (there will be many solutions, since your employees do so
little). For each solution, you need to identify and include the following:
a. The solution’s problem or opportunity (the reason your company has a need for the solution).
i. If you’re having trouble with this, think about your company’s product(s) and/or service(s), the
departments, infrastructure, and issues related to infrastructure. Also, remember that you will outsource
all of your needs.
ii. Also, look at the slides, which include many e-commerce solutions (e.g., design work, payment
solutions, etc.). These examples may jump-start some ideas for solutions. However, youâll need to go
beyond the examples.
b. The name of and URL for the company that will provide the solution (your company is the recipient of the
solution, not the provider).
c. The price for the good or service. While this may not be possible for every solution, an accurate or
closely estimated price should be possible for most solutions.
d. A brief description of how the solution will help your company
Sample Solution
We Do Not Understand Anything At the littlest sizes of presence, our originations of existence are unessential. State on the off chance that we experienced littler and littler sizes of our bodies, we would find that in the long run we would show up at Planck length (Roper, 131). To envision the size of Planck length, think about that as a hydrogen iota is 10 trillion Planck lengths over. At this scale, reality as we probably am aware it can never again can be comprehended. So I don’t get that’s meaning as far as getting ourselves? Indeed, we can properly say that truly, we do have reality concurring certain sizes of ourselves (bigger than Planck length), yet with respect to our ultra-microscopic selves, the basic matter of what our identity is, our understanding of presence separates (Joplin, 12). Who might we be without existence? A few people may state we would be nothing, while others may state we would resemble virtual particles, flying all through presenceâwhich is somewhat more than nothing, however it can’t be said to carefully exist. It would mean we exist and don’t exist at the same time. This thought compares to my next point: that any inquiry we pose can be replied from various
perspectives. The response to any question is vague when attempting to state demanding truth (Hopp, 45). Take a straightforward inquiry for a model: “What is your name?” My name is Nicholas David Klacsanzky as indicated by law, however my name could be any number of names that I have appended to my character, and others have given me. Is my legitimate name my actual and just name? That is up for translation. What’s more, indeed, any announcement of assumed “truth” can be disentangled to show that there is another approach to take a gander at it. There is a Zen maxim that comes this way, “To talk is to commit an error.” This is said with the possibility that reality can’t be spoken, as truth is comprehensive and even past beingâit would need to be spoken about in wording that don’t exist in language all together for the truth of reality to be seen through language (which is a mystery). In this way, truth is an encounter. I accept this is the reason Socrates stated, “I know just of my own obliviousness,” and made the individuals at the highest point of antiquated Greek society confounded about their essential ideas of their reality. We can’t comprehend reality through mental ideas: just through our unadulterated experience without the hindrance of mental movement. Without the interference and obfuscating of reality by mental procedures, presence is clear. We don’t have to comprehend anything so as to know presence for what it’s worth. Truth be told, the main way we can see the truth is by quitting any pretense of attempting to comprehend and quitting any pretense of “getting” itself. At that point we can observer life in the entirety of its significant effortlessness. References Roper, Jake. Troubling Truth. New York: Owl Books, 2008. Print. Joplin, Michele. Transformative Coexistence. Chicago: Bob Fugen Press, 2012. Print. Hopp, Jason. Untruthful Truths. Seattle: Reed Bender Press, 2013. Print. paper about nature, science article, innovation exposition 5/5 NEED HELP? Approach a specialist for FREE>
We Do Not Understand Anything At the littlest sizes of presence, our originations of existence are unessential. State on the off chance that we experienced littler and littler sizes of our bodies, we would find that in the long run we would show up at Planck length (Roper, 131). To envision the size of Planck length, think about that as a hydrogen iota is 10 trillion Planck lengths over. At this scale, reality as we probably am aware it can never again can be comprehended. So I don’t get that’s meaning as far as getting ourselves? Indeed, we can properly say that truly, we do have reality concurring certain sizes of ourselves (bigger than Planck length), yet with respect to our ultra-microscopic selves, the basic matter of what our identity is, our understanding of presence separates (Joplin, 12). Who might we be without existence? A few people may state we would be nothing, while others may state we would resemble virtual particles, flying all through presenceâwhich is somewhat more than nothing, however it can’t be said to carefully exist. It would mean we exist and don’t exist at the same time. This thought compares to my next point: that any inquiry we pose can be replied from various perspectives. The response to any question is vague when attempting to state demanding truth (Hopp, 45). Take a straightforward inquiry for a model: “What is your name?” My name is Nicholas David Klacsanzky as indicated by law, however my name could be any number of names that I have appended to my character, and others have given me. Is my legitimate name my actual and just name? That is up for translation. What’s more, indeed, any announcement of assumed “truth” can be disentangled to show that there is another approach to take a gander at it. There is a Zen maxim that comes this way, “To talk is to commit an error.” This is said with the possibility that reality can’t be spoken, as truth is comprehensive and even past beingâit would need to be spoken about in wording that don’t exist in language all together for the truth of reality to be seen through language (which is a mystery). In this way, truth is an encounter. I accept this is the reason Socrates stated, “I know just of my own obliviousness,” and made the individuals at the highest point of antiquated Greek society confounded about their essential ideas of their reality. We can’t comprehend reality through mental ideas: just through our unadulterated experience without the hindrance of mental movement. Without the interference and obfuscating of reality by mental procedures, presence is clear. We don’t have to comprehend anything so as to know presence for what it’s worth. Truth be told, the main way we can see the truth is by quitting any pretense of attempting to comprehend and quitting any pretense of “getting” itself. At that point we can observer life in the entirety of its significant effortlessness. References Roper, Jake. Troubling Truth. New York: Owl Books, 2008. Print. Joplin, Michele. Transformative Coexistence. Chicago: Bob Fugen Press, 2012. Print. Hopp, Jason. Untruthful Truths. Seattle: Reed Bender Press, 2013. Print. paper about nature, science article, innovation exposition 5/5 NEED HELP? Approach a specialist for FREE>
