I need an explanation for this Social Science question to help me study.
Need a discussion post just like outlined below. My topic is gene editing in environmental impact. I will have further work on this in the future as well
To get started this week for your initial post, provide a summary of your section and an outline. Follow this format:
- Topic:
- Your Angle:
- Main idea of your section:
- Key points of evidence:
- Preliminary analysis of evidence:
- Conclusions and recommendations:
- References (provide at least one high-quality source at this point)
Here is an example:
- Topic: Geoengineering (this is a topic we’ve used in previous classes)
- Your angle: legal/political section writer
- Main idea of your section: Because geoengineering is an emerging area of study, few laws govern its use. The problem is that different nations have different climates, and each may approach geoengineering in a different way. Leaders of the world need to get together and discuss this important issue.
- Key points of evidence: Political leaders do not discuss or even mention geoengineering publicly. It is a political hot potato.
- Preliminary analysis of evidence: Politicians are most likely considering the use of geoengineering behind the scenes.
- Conclusions and recommendations: We need to have an open, honest discussion and craft appropriate regulations.
- References
Buck, H. J. (2019). How to cool an ocean. MIT Technology Review, 122(3), 56-61.
Discusses how “marine cloud brightening,” a form of solar geoengineering, could potentially reduce the temperature of the ocean and save coral reefs. From a legal/political perspective, who gets to decide if this experiment should be allowed?
