Description
Writing a Research Paper
This information has been adjusted by the professor from a program at Southern Utah University. These are helpful suggestions for writing undergraduate classes taught by Dr. Ric Caric.
What is involved in writing research papers?
- There is a research paper assignment for this class. These are the requirements for the paper.
a. Title Page: Including your name, the title of the paper, a one-paragraph abstract,
b. Body of Paper: at least 10-12 pages,
Including Introduction that informs readers of a topic, research question, and hypothesis
Analysis of at least 8 sources (primary and secondary) in relation to hypothesis c. List of References (primary sources or published works directly cited in your paper)
d. Bibliography (works you used but did not cite).
- Reminders About Hypothesis and Research:
- You also need to propose your own idea which can involve:
a. developing an original hypothesis b. agreeing or disagreeing with an idea in the literature on your topic.
- A Problem
a. Many of the research proposals had overly broad hypotheses that would take five or six books to examine with any plausibility.
b. The books we read for this class are models of hypotheses about phenomena on the local, national, and regional levels. Obviously, thereâs no time to engage in primary research on a topic like hip hop in Mali, but I recommend that students define their projects in ways that can be completed in 10-12 pages.
- General Instructions.
Students need to identify a body of research materials, hopefully, primary source materials such as videos, interviews, online archives, or quantitative databases. Journal articles and books can also provide the basis for a research paper. As an advanced student you are expected to have your own ideas about your research materials, be able to relate your ideas to other writing on the topic, and demonstrate a deeper understanding of the material than would be the case for introductory students.
Practical Tips for Getting Started
When preparing to write your paper first discuss the topic with your faculty member and seek clarification on any questions you might have. Do NOT start the paper until you are sure you know what you are doing.
- Show Initiative. If you know you will write a paper for the course then show initiative early in starting your research and study of the subject matter. The worst thing you can do is wait to start your research.
- Show Imagination. A college education is about learning, but it is also about the exploration of the subject. Use your imagination and thinking skills to explore and expand both your understanding and the topic itself.
- Draft a skeleton and then the more detailed outline of the paper. Think of it as your table of contents. Outlining your paper or writing a journal about your research project can be very helpful in clarifying what youâre doing. The professor engages in extensive outlining and journaling himself and recommends it to students
- As you begin to work on your paper and collect more information/ideas, adjust the outline so that it better reflects the knowledge and understanding of the subject. The outline should help you stay “on the topic” and ensure a logical organization for the paper, but do not be afraid to explore and expand a paper as your knowledge or understanding grows.
- Please feel free to submit an early draft to the professor (me!) for evaluation and suggestions.
Some General Requirements for Writing
- Be sure to identify your assumptions and beliefs. By identifying your own beliefs or ideals you can better understand how the ideas of others affect you. An important part of the paper is being to show you have grown in that understanding. A good paper may not change your ideas in each instance, but it should expand your understanding of a topic.
- Define all your terms to ensure readers and writers will understand each other. Do NOT assume your reader will completely understand in each instance. The professor has knowledge of several types of literature but may not have specialist knowledge of your topic. A good rule of thumb is to write the paper as if you were educating a generally knowledgeable person who has not done research on this topic.
- Support ALL assertions with evidence and proof. This is where both your sources (research) and your application collide. If you make a statement of fact or truth then be able to prove it.
- Use your introduction to inform readers of the general nature of your topic, the research question that youâre going to address and the nature of your hypothesis concerning that question.
- Don’t depend on headings to make transitions between ideas.
- Use good writing skills and practices.
- In your comments on the secondary literature, be sure to judiciously employ direct quotations or references to other works. Likewise, the body of your paper should discuss the relationship between your ideas and those in the research literature. Students are encouraged to challenge established ideas but also need to show that they know such ideas.
- When you use quotations to be sure to a) introduce the writer and establish his/her credibility, b) explain or interpret what has been said, and c) analyze the value of the other person’s contribution to the discussion at hand.
- To avoid plagiarism, first, read your sourcebook (or other material), then close it and make notes on what you think is important. (Be sure to take down all details — author, title, publisher, date of publication, page numbers of direct quotations and/or interesting ideas.)
- The vast majority of the paper should be your own words and ideas.
- Pay close attention to the dates of your reference materials. Including references to some classic articles or books is good, but you should be extremely cautious about building your whole paper on dated materials. Similarly, you must be careful not to rely on only one or two sources.
Some Things to Avoid
- Statements that do not logically follow from each other.
- Unfounded and unsupportable generalizations
- Circular arguments. (eg., Communication is important because organizations need leaders who can communicate effectively.)
- Arguments based on the idea that everyone does or knows something. (eg., Bureaucracy is bad because everyone thinks it is.)
- Attacks on perfunctory rather than central ideas. (i.e, getting sidetracked)
Sample Solution
Three-dimensional facial remaking is finished by figures or high goals, three-dimensional pictures. PC programs can make facial reproductions by controlling checked photos of the remaining parts and use approximations to reproduce facial highlights. These will in general produce results that don’t look counterfeit (Reichs and Craig 491). Now and then, examiners will utilize a strategy called superimposition as a method for facial remaking. Tragically, it’s anything but a regularly utilized technique, as it expects examiners to have some information about the personality of the remaining parts they are managing. By superimposing a photo of a person over the skeletal remains, examiners can check whether the facial highlights line up with the anatomical highlights, permitting them to recognize an injured individual. On account of John Wayne Gacy’s exploited people, specialists had the option to utilize facial recreation to distinguish nine of the bodies found in the slither space. The accompanying realistic shows the facial reproductions of these nine unfortunate casualties: Since facial recreation was insufficient to distinguish the entirety of the people in question, examiners acquired DNA profiles from every one of the unidentified unfortunate casualties and effectively searched out DNA tests from guys over the United States who had been accounted for missing somewhere in the range of 1970 and 1979 (Cook County Sheriff’s Office 3). The rest of the exploited people were distinguished utilizing dental and radiology records. Since dental polish is harder than bone, teeth outlive tissue and some of the time bone when the body deteriorates. Teeth are truly solid in recognizing unfortunate casualties, as they will in general uncover propensities about the individual, for example, nail gnawing, crushing and weight propensities, lip gnawing, and gripping (Ryan 254). Besides, the top of the mouth, which frames a curve, is one of a kind to every person fit as a fiddle, size, and form. Teeth additionally have singular attributes that are special to every individual in that the relationship of teeth to each other shifts, alongside size and state of the jaws and sense of taste (Ryan 255). So as to distinguish an individual utilizing dental records, scientific dental specialists must obtain the dental records of the person in question or perished. In cases including different passings, scientific dental specialists get a rundown of potential people and afterward contrast records with the teeth (Freeman standard. 2). Much of the time, X-beams are viewed as increasingly solid and give the best correlations, yet these are not constantly accessible to criminological examiners. When the dental records have been gained, measurable agents at that point take a gander at the individual tooth size, shading, and shape, curve sizes and types, and the connection between the jaws, which is utilized to help arrange facial sorts (Ryan 256). In spite of the fact that John Wayne Gacy’s latest unfortunate casualty was Robert Piest in 1978, agents in Cook County are as yet scanning for recognizable proof for the rest of the bodies. The most as of late recognized unfortunate casualty, William Bundy, was convincingly distinguished in 2011. The Cook County Sheriff’s area of expertise reported that year that they were restoring their endeavors to distinguish the staying seven of Gacy’s exploited people. Be that as it may, nobody has since approached to definitively distinguish them, and their names stay obscure. John Wayne Gacy was one of America’s most productive sequential executioners. With an injured individual include of 33 youngsters in a three-year range of time, Gacy was condemned to death by willful extermination for his wrongdoings. Measurable researchers and examiners had the option to attach Gacy to the killings by utilizing dental and radiology records, facial recreation, and DNA proof. Without the utilization of criminological innovation and the exertion set forth by the specialists, Gacy would have kept submitting murders and a large number of the unfortunate casualties would have gone unnoticed. While the case has been cold for a long time, agents are as yet attempting to recognize the rest of the unfortunate casualties so as to give bit of psyche to the groups of the perished. John Wayne Gacy has stood out forever for his violations, however his exploited people will never be overlooked.>
Three-dimensional facial remaking is finished by figures or high goals, three-dimensional pictures. PC programs can make facial reproductions by controlling checked photos of the remaining parts and use approximations to reproduce facial highlights. These will in general produce results that don’t look counterfeit (Reichs and Craig 491). Now and then, examiners will utilize a strategy called superimposition as a method for facial remaking. Tragically, it’s anything but a regularly utilized technique, as it expects examiners to have some information about the personality of the remaining parts they are managing. By superimposing a photo of a person over the skeletal remains, examiners can check whether the facial highlights line up with the anatomical highlights, permitting them to recognize an injured individual. On account of John Wayne Gacy’s exploited people, specialists had the option to utilize facial recreation to distinguish nine of the bodies found in the slither space. The accompanying realistic shows the facial reproductions of these nine unfortunate casualties: Since facial recreation was insufficient to distinguish the entirety of the people in question, examiners acquired DNA profiles from every one of the unidentified unfortunate casualties and effectively searched out DNA tests from guys over the United States who had been accounted for missing somewhere in the range of 1970 and 1979 (Cook County Sheriff’s Office 3). The rest of the exploited people were distinguished utilizing dental and radiology records. Since dental polish is harder than bone, teeth outlive tissue and some of the time bone when the body deteriorates. Teeth are truly solid in recognizing unfortunate casualties, as they will in general uncover propensities about the individual, for example, nail gnawing, crushing and weight propensities, lip gnawing, and gripping (Ryan 254). Besides, the top of the mouth, which frames a curve, is one of a kind to every person fit as a fiddle, size, and form. Teeth additionally have singular attributes that are special to every individual in that the relationship of teeth to each other shifts, alongside size and state of the jaws and sense of taste (Ryan 255). So as to distinguish an individual utilizing dental records, scientific dental specialists must obtain the dental records of the person in question or perished. In cases including different passings, scientific dental specialists get a rundown of potential people and afterward contrast records with the teeth (Freeman standard. 2). Much of the time, X-beams are viewed as increasingly solid and give the best correlations, yet these are not constantly accessible to criminological examiners. When the dental records have been gained, measurable agents at that point take a gander at the individual tooth size, shading, and shape, curve sizes and types, and the connection between the jaws, which is utilized to help arrange facial sorts (Ryan 256). In spite of the fact that John Wayne Gacy’s latest unfortunate casualty was Robert Piest in 1978, agents in Cook County are as yet scanning for recognizable proof for the rest of the bodies. The most as of late recognized unfortunate casualty, William Bundy, was convincingly distinguished in 2011. The Cook County Sheriff’s area of expertise reported that year that they were restoring their endeavors to distinguish the staying seven of Gacy’s exploited people. Be that as it may, nobody has since approached to definitively distinguish them, and their names stay obscure. John Wayne Gacy was one of America’s most productive sequential executioners. With an injured individual include of 33 youngsters in a three-year range of time, Gacy was condemned to death by willful extermination for his wrongdoings. Measurable researchers and examiners had the option to attach Gacy to the killings by utilizing dental and radiology records, facial recreation, and DNA proof. Without the utilization of criminological innovation and the exertion set forth by the specialists, Gacy would have kept submitting murders and a large number of the unfortunate casualties would have gone unnoticed. While the case has been cold for a long time, agents are as yet attempting to recognize the rest of the unfortunate casualties so as to give bit of psyche to the groups of the perished. John Wayne Gacy has stood out forever for his violations, however his exploited people will never be overlooked.>