Students will watch one of the movies from the list below (years 1980 to now). After watching the actor in
the more recent films listed below, the student will then choose an actor/film from an older film provided in
the Film Response # 1 or 2 listsâyears 1920 to 1979 (that you did not write about before) and watch that
film. The objective is to compose a paper comparing and contrasting the two actorâs acting style, and
believability. You can do some brief cited research on the actors training if you would like but it is not
necessary. The important thing is to focus on what similarities or differences you see in each actor by
watching each film. Did you believe or prefer one actor to the other? Again, this is a comparison of the
actors not the characters they portray and it is important we see you own reaction in the paper. Minimum
word requirement is 600 to 750 words, but feel free to expand if needed. Research is not necessary but if
you do include please cite properly!
Timothy Hutton or Mary Tyler Moore or Donald Sutherland: Ordinary People (1980)
Sissy Spacek: Coal Minerâs Daughter (1980)
Jack Nicholson: The Shining (1980), A Few Good Men (1992), As Good as it Gets (1997), About Schmidt
(2002)
Robert DeNiro: Raging Bull (1980), The King of Comedy (1982)
Peter OâToole: The Stunt Man (1980), My Favorite Year (1982)
Robert Duvall, Michael OâKeefe: The Great Santini (1980)
Gene Wilder, Richard Pryor: Stir Crazy (1980)
Mel Gibson: Gallipoli (1981), Hamlet (1990), Pocahontas (John Smith) 1995
Paul Newman: Absence of Malice (1981), The Verdict (1982), Nobodyâs Fool (1994)
Robin Williams: The World According To Garp (1982), Awakenings (1990), Aladdin (1992), Good Will
Hunting (1997), One Hour Photo (2002)
Jerry Lewis: The King of Comedy (1982)
Glenn Close: The World According To Garp (1982), Fatal Attraction (1987)
Mel Gibson: Gallipoli (1981), Hamlet (1990)
Richard Gere: An Officer and a Gentleman (1982), Chicago (2002)
Louis Gossett Jr.: An Officer and a Gentleman (1982)
Jessica Lange: Tootsie (1982), Sweet Dreams (1985)
William Hurt: Kiss of the Spider Woman (1985), Children of a Lesser God (1986), Broadcast News (1987),
A History of Violence (2005)
Debra Winger: An Officer and a Gentleman (1982), Terms of Endearment (1983), Shadowlands (1993), The
Lovers (2017)
Sample Solution
Reason for Lung Cancer GuidesorSubmit my paper for examination lung malignancy diagramAmong fatal ailments mankind has not yet figured out how to treat, disease is likely one of the most dreaded ailments. Not at all like AIDS or different maladies broadly spread in nations with low expectations for everyday comforts, disease’s geology is a lot more extensive, including both rich and poor nations similarly. Among the wide range of sorts of malignancy, one of the most well-known is lung disease; the earth where individuals live in the 21st century extraordinarily adds to the advancement of this kind of disease. The first and the most well known reason for lung malignant growth is smoking cigarettes. By various appraisals, smoking cigarettes causes roughly 86% of lung malignant growth cases, including cases brought about by uninvolved introduction to smoke breathed out by different smokers. These odds increment if an individual began smoking tobacco at a youthful age. Aloof smoking represents a lesser danger, however is as yet perilousâit is realized that latent smokers (who are generally presented to smoke grinding away or at home) have a 25% higher danger of lung malignant growth contrasted with individuals who are not presented to the smoke of cigarettes. Standard overwhelming introduction to natural tobacco smoke can expand the danger of lung malignancy by half (CancerResearch UK). Hereditary qualities and lung maladies in one’s hereditary qualities can likewise become huge hazard components of lung malignant growth. For instance, if an individual’s mom, father, kin, auntie, uncle, or grandparent has had lung malignant growth, the odds of this individual creating lung disease somewhat increments. Simultaneously, it has not been at this point inquired about whether qualities in fact increment malignancy possibilities, or they increment people’s weakness to this ailment. With respect to lung infections, some of them are known to influence the odds of malignancy improvement. Specifically, among such ailments are tuberculosis and incessant obstructive pneumonic illness. Different sicknesses like constant bronchitis and emphysema can cause scarring in the lungs, which implies the expansion of the measure of tissue in themâand as it is known, malignant growth is an uncontrolled division of cells, and the individual increase of tissues (Healthline). Concerning other natural elements, one of the most huge among them is the introduction to asbestos filaments and comparative materials. Generally, an individual is presented to these silicate materials at the working environment: specialized works, for example, warm and acoustic protection, include the use of asbestos. These days, asbestos is restricted or even precluded from utilization, since it has been demonstrated that asbestos materials can cause both lung malignant growth and mesothelioma (disease of the lungs’ pleura, just as malignant growth of peritoneumâa covering of the stomach depression). Indeed, even non-smoking asbestos laborers have a five times higher danger of creating lung malignancy; concerning the smoking asbestos laborers, their odds to get disease are up to ninety-overlap more prominent than nonsmokers (MedicineNet.com). As it tends to be seen, lung malignancy doesn’t create all alone, yet is activated by various elements. The most importantly of them is smoking tobacco, both dynamic and latent. Introduction to asbestos materials likewise builds an individual’s odds to get lung disease. Additionally, hereditary qualities and past lung ailments can prompt the improvement of this kind of malignant growth. The solution for lung malignant growth isn’t settled, and stays a pestilence. References “Lung Cancer Symptoms, Causes, Treatment.” MedicineNet. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 Aug. 2015. “Lung Cancer Risks and Causes.” CancerResearch UK. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 Aug. 2015. “Lung Cancer Causes.” Health>
Reason for Lung Cancer GuidesorSubmit my paper for examination lung malignancy diagramAmong fatal ailments mankind has not yet figured out how to treat, disease is likely one of the most dreaded ailments. Not at all like AIDS or different maladies broadly spread in nations with low expectations for everyday comforts, disease’s geology is a lot more extensive, including both rich and poor nations similarly. Among the wide range of sorts of malignancy, one of the most well-known is lung disease; the earth where individuals live in the 21st century extraordinarily adds to the advancement of this kind of disease. The first and the most well known reason for lung malignant growth is smoking cigarettes. By various appraisals, smoking cigarettes causes roughly 86% of lung malignant growth cases, including cases brought about by uninvolved introduction to smoke breathed out by different smokers. These odds increment if an individual began smoking tobacco at a youthful age. Aloof smoking represents a lesser danger, however is as yet perilousâit is realized that latent smokers (who are generally presented to smoke grinding away or at home) have a 25% higher danger of lung malignant growth contrasted with individuals who are not presented to the smoke of cigarettes. Standard overwhelming introduction to natural tobacco smoke can expand the danger of lung malignancy by half (CancerResearch UK). Hereditary qualities and lung maladies in one’s hereditary qualities can likewise become huge hazard components of lung malignant growth. For instance, if an individual’s mom, father, kin, auntie, uncle, or grandparent has had lung malignant growth, the odds of this individual creating lung disease somewhat increments. Simultaneously, it has not been at this point inquired about whether qualities in fact increment malignancy possibilities, or they increment people’s weakness to this ailment. With respect to lung infections, some of them are known to influence the odds of malignancy improvement. Specifically, among such ailments are tuberculosis and incessant obstructive pneumonic illness. Different sicknesses like constant bronchitis and emphysema can cause scarring in the lungs, which implies the expansion of the measure of tissue in themâand as it is known, malignant growth is an uncontrolled division of cells, and the individual increase of tissues (Healthline). Concerning other natural elements, one of the most huge among them is the introduction to asbestos filaments and comparative materials. Generally, an individual is presented to these silicate materials at the working environment: specialized works, for example, warm and acoustic protection, include the use of asbestos. These days, asbestos is restricted or even precluded from utilization, since it has been demonstrated that asbestos materials can cause both lung malignant growth and mesothelioma (disease of the lungs’ pleura, just as malignant growth of peritoneumâa covering of the stomach depression). Indeed, even non-smoking asbestos laborers have a five times higher danger of creating lung malignancy; concerning the smoking asbestos laborers, their odds to get disease are up to ninety-overlap more prominent than nonsmokers (MedicineNet.com). As it tends to be seen, lung malignancy doesn’t create all alone, yet is activated by various elements. The most importantly of them is smoking tobacco, both dynamic and latent. Introduction to asbestos materials likewise builds an individual’s odds to get lung disease. Additionally, hereditary qualities and past lung ailments can prompt the improvement of this kind of malignant growth. The solution for lung malignant growth isn’t settled, and stays a pestilence. References “Lung Cancer Symptoms, Causes, Treatment.” MedicineNet. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 Aug. 2015. “Lung Cancer Risks and Causes.” CancerResearch UK. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 Aug. 2015. “Lung Cancer Causes.” Health>