As you continue to learn about collaboration, there are many challenges in learning how to effectively build collaboration with other people. In the presentation this week Cultivating Collaboration: Don’t Be So Defensive!, Jim Tamm discusses that the single greatest inhibitor of collaboration is our own defenses.
Answer the following questions in your thread: Discuss a situation that you personally faced where your own defenses impacted the outcome of a collaborative effort. Do you agree that it was personal fears that were the foundation of your defenses? From viewing this presentation and course readings, what strategies have you learned to be non-defensive and how could you behave differently for a different outcome? Feel free to include a Bible verse or link to another video to support your statement.
https://cdnapisec.kaltura.com/index.php/extwidget/preview/partner_id/2167581/uiconf_id/39959791/entry_id/1_agda61py/embed/dynamic
Sample Solution
Option to Own Handguns The option to claim a gun is a questionable issue for a considerable length of time and the privileges of firearm rights activists and against weapon supporters refered to the subsequent revision. Many firearm aficionados accept that the appropriate for people to claim a gun is ensured continuously alteration of the US Constitution and that the execution of weapon control is an encroachment of established rights. Promoters of hostile to – firearm accept that the subsequent change doesn’t ensure the individual ‘s option to possess a gun, however just ensures that singular nations have rights to their own state army. As an announcement of what the law seems to be, this is absolutely off-base: so far the court has not deciphered the “second change” as a “hold a self-preservation gun” right (in the expressions of Steven) , Pistol is at home. The court composed that forbidding the utilization of a gun at home infringing upon the Colombia Special District versus Heller versus the subsequent change and disallowing the real firearm from self checking at home. “The remarks of Judge Scalia specify mindful limitations. Gun’s discussion appears to emerge from an outrageous perspective on singular opportunity. In this view, possessing a gun is to communicate your own sway, that is, to hold the veto right to the world. The firearm causes a few people to feel ground-breaking – much more alluring. Gun culture is to purchase manliness at a modest cost. Firearms are fundamental and helpful apparatuses for the safeguard of the nation and people, that is it. Improving them doesn’t help cause the firearm’s correct. In the event that you don’t care for firearm control as it harms your own power, you are perusing an excessive amount of Ayn Rand. On the off chance that you are worried that dynamic guideline is equivalent to oppression, it would be ideal if you read the history book. Preservationist weapons stain the firearm’s directly through obstinate and radical earth. There is a genuine case of the ongoing rifle relationship of the National Rifle Association.>
Option to Own Handguns The option to claim a gun is a questionable issue for a considerable length of time and the privileges of firearm rights activists and against weapon supporters refered to the subsequent revision. Many firearm aficionados accept that the appropriate for people to claim a gun is ensured continuously alteration of the US Constitution and that the execution of weapon control is an encroachment of established rights. Promoters of hostile to – firearm accept that the subsequent change doesn’t ensure the individual ‘s option to possess a gun, however just ensures that singular nations have rights to their own state army. As an announcement of what the law seems to be, this is absolutely off-base: so far the court has not deciphered the “second change” as a “hold a self-preservation gun” right (in the expressions of Steven) , Pistol is at home. The court composed that forbidding the utilization of a gun at home infringing upon the Colombia Special District versus Heller versus the subsequent change and disallowing the real firearm from self checking at home. “The remarks of Judge Scalia specify mindful limitations. Gun’s discussion appears to emerge from an outrageous perspective on singular opportunity. In this view, possessing a gun is to communicate your own sway, that is, to hold the veto right to the world. The firearm causes a few people to feel ground-breaking – much more alluring. Gun culture is to purchase manliness at a modest cost. Firearms are fundamental and helpful apparatuses for the safeguard of the nation and people, that is it. Improving them doesn’t help cause the firearm’s correct. In the event that you don’t care for firearm control as it harms your own power, you are perusing an excessive amount of Ayn Rand. On the off chance that you are worried that dynamic guideline is equivalent to oppression, it would be ideal if you read the history book. Preservationist weapons stain the firearm’s directly through obstinate and radical earth. There is a genuine case of the ongoing rifle relationship of the National Rifle Association.>
