Citizens United v. the FEC overturned the 2002 McCain-Feingold law (Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act), which regulated how much money could be spend by independent groups, such as corporations, right before primary and general elections. Who is right, the Supreme Court or Congress? Is moneyâespecially money connected to special economic interestsâa danger to democracy or is it, as Justice Kennedy says in his Citizens United opinion, protected speech?
- Since the 1970s, when legislation was passed regulating campaign finances and creating the Federal Election Commission, Congress and the Supreme Court have been fighting over campaign finance law. a. Congress would like to rein in the influence of money on politics b. The Supreme Court argues that campaign expenditures are protected by the First Amendment as Free Speech 2. In 2010, the Supreme Court ruled in Citizens United vs. FEC that the government could not restrict independent expenditures by corporations or unions in support of candidates. a. The Court (majority opinion) argued that spending money on electioneering communication is effectively the same thing as free speech. b. It is protected by the First Amendment to the US Constitution c. When it comes to political speech, there is no difference between individuals and corporations.
- Supporters of campaign finance regulation (such as the McCain-Feingold law) argue that independent corporate expenditures give rise to the appearance of corruption in politics (candidates if elected will favor corporations that made independent corporate expenditures that benefitted their campaign). a. As the chapter on Interest Groups tells us there is a difference between the special interests of for-profit corporations and the public interest. b. Special interests drown out the voices of ordinary citizens. Ordinary citizens donât have interest group representation or the extraordinary amounts of money to produce issue advertisements.
- From here out you must make your own argument in favor of or against the decision in Citizens United. The prompt invites you to move from the somewhat narrow topic of speech vs. corruption to the broader one of does money in politics threaten U.S. democracy?
Sample Solution
To respond to the proposition question a few sub-questions are replied. First the laws and guidelines ought to be surveyed on their pertinence to security mindfulness during movement. Following this examination it is critical to see how laws and guidelines impact the present security mindfulness arrangement. Thirdly it is critical to see which entertainers inside the seaward business are generally applicable for Tideway in shaping a security arrangement. At that point through a survey it will be looked into how mindful representatives are of security dangers. At long last in asking how Tideway can convey adequately about security attention to their faculty will help the organization in keeping representatives security mindful. Vision As a global organization working abroad just as in European waters Tideway experiences security circumstances in high hazard situations. Security mindfulness ought to be the foundation of an organization’s security arrangement and culture. It isn’t the specialized wellbeing estimates that have the most effect on security inside an organization however the security culture that has the greatest effect. A security mindfulness program for Tideway is best if workers feel dependable about security. In addition to the fact that employees need to be security developed, yet additionally the higher administration of Tideway ought to give the board backing to this culture. As good examples, chiefs structure an essential part in this procedure. Workers should realize what should be accounted for, and to whom it should be accounted for, how to deal with basic circumstances and who to contact inside (facilitator or the board) and remotely (private or open crisis responders) from the organization. Furthermore, it is basic to realize how to contact the people in control.>
To respond to the proposition question a few sub-questions are replied. First the laws and guidelines ought to be surveyed on their pertinence to security mindfulness during movement. Following this examination it is critical to see how laws and guidelines impact the present security mindfulness arrangement. Thirdly it is critical to see which entertainers inside the seaward business are generally applicable for Tideway in shaping a security arrangement. At that point through a survey it will be looked into how mindful representatives are of security dangers. At long last in asking how Tideway can convey adequately about security attention to their faculty will help the organization in keeping representatives security mindful. Vision As a global organization working abroad just as in European waters Tideway experiences security circumstances in high hazard situations. Security mindfulness ought to be the foundation of an organization’s security arrangement and culture. It isn’t the specialized wellbeing estimates that have the most effect on security inside an organization however the security culture that has the greatest effect. A security mindfulness program for Tideway is best if workers feel dependable about security. In addition to the fact that employees need to be security developed, yet additionally the higher administration of Tideway ought to give the board backing to this culture. As good examples, chiefs structure an essential part in this procedure. Workers should realize what should be accounted for, and to whom it should be accounted for, how to deal with basic circumstances and who to contact inside (facilitator or the board) and remotely (private or open crisis responders) from the organization. Furthermore, it is basic to realize how to contact the people in control.>
