Your community health assessment was well received by the executives at Vila Health. Consequently, they have asked you to recommend a change in the community that will improve health outcomes. They have also asked you to submit your recommendation in a formal change proposal. You are confident that you can present a strong case for change, including a financial plan, that will ensure the success of this initiative.
In this assessment, you will draft a change proposal to executive leaders to solicit support for a change to the current community health care system. To prepare for the assessment, you are encouraged to begin thinking about your justification for establishing the recommended change as a priority, a strategy for leading change, and how the change will be funded. In addition, you may wish to:
Review the assessment requirements and scoring guide to ensure that you understand the work you will be asked to complete.
Review the Guiding Questions: Planning for Community and Organizational Change document linked in the Resources of this assessment, which includes questions to consider and additional guidance on how to successfully complete the assessment.
Note: Remember that you can submit all or a portion of your draft change proposal to Smarthinking Tutoring for feedback before you submit the final version for this assessment. If you plan on using this free service, be mindful of the turnaround time of 24â48 hours for receiving feedback.
If you have not already done so, complete the Vila Health: Planning for Change simulation.
Draft a change proposal to justify your recommendation for improving the health of the community and establish the change as a priority for the next budget cycle. Consider the feasibility of your proposed change, in terms of overall scope, funding, and timeframe.
The change proposal requirements outlined below, correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. The Guiding Questions: Planning for Community and Organizational Change document provides additional considerations that may be helpful in completing your assessment. In addition, be sure to note the requirements below for document format and length and for citing supporting evidence.
Identify the benefits of proposed health care system changes and its implications for a community.
Describe potential barriers to change in an organization or community.
Develop strategies for changing barriers into opportunities and resolving conflict.
Develop a strategy for helping organizational stakeholders understand and evaluate the proposed changes to an existing health care system.
Develop a grant proposal and associated budget for a proposed change to an existing health care system.
Sample Solution
The U.S. arm income and military assistance were controversial shape the element of human rights and democracy merchandising for long time. but, the changes in these regions as of September 11 are of most important significance. although vulnerable and failed states are defined as a safety threat,39 a lot of the expansion of army-to-navy members of the family occurs with international locations that match the criteria of poorly appearing states as decided by way of the UN improvement software, the arena bank, and Freedom house.40 at the same time, the bar has been raised for developmental useful resource, and susceptible and failing states are explicitly excluded from a brand new software which promotes improvement on the floor that the aid could not be effective for the areas of terrible governance. particularly, The Millennium assignment Account, proposed with the aid of President G. W. Bush in March 2002 and authorized by the Congress, guarantees to deliver enormous new flows of foreign assistance to low-income countries which can be âruling justly, investing in their own people, and inspiring financial freedomâ. greater mainly, U.S. navy and police useful resource to forty seven poorly appearing states, analyzed in a big studies performed via a suppose-tank within the States, commenced to multiply in 2002, so that taken collectively those countries obtained 114 instances as a lot assistance in 2004 as they did in 2000. the bulk of money went to seven nations labeled as âconflict on terrorâ states â Afghanistan, Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Yemen, Indonesia, Tajikistan and Djibouti. U.S. authorities files claim that an underlying motive of resource to all of these states is to encourage human rights and pluralistic politics. In reality, on 9/11 three of those seven international locations had been legally banned from receiving U.S. security assistance by using foreign help Act which prohibited aid to international locations whose authorities reached energy thru a navy coup and nations developing nuclear guns. moreover, Congress had prohibited most resource to Indonesiaâs security forces because of critical human rights issues. however, the Bush management waived those prohibitions inside the weeks following the assaults on 9-11.42 The aid become channeled for various purposes, frequently guns and equipment, but also even meals, uniforms, and salaries for some militaries in vital Asia so unestablished, unprofessional or underequpped. moreover, the united states educated 4.5 times as many military and police employees from the war on terror nations in 2003 because it did in 2000, except for joint army operations and joint schooling sports, which do no longer appear in respectable reports to Congress. inside the identical research, every other institution of 12 poorly acting states had been categorized as strategically important: Georgia, Nigeria, Kenya, Azerbaijan, Ethiopia, Guinea, Eritrea, Cameroon, Zambia, Chad, Tanzania and Niger. The principal U.S. hobby serv>
The U.S. arm income and military assistance were controversial shape the element of human rights and democracy merchandising for long time. but, the changes in these regions as of September 11 are of most important significance. although vulnerable and failed states are defined as a safety threat,39 a lot of the expansion of army-to-navy members of the family occurs with international locations that match the criteria of poorly appearing states as decided by way of the UN improvement software, the arena bank, and Freedom house.40 at the same time, the bar has been raised for developmental useful resource, and susceptible and failing states are explicitly excluded from a brand new software which promotes improvement on the floor that the aid could not be effective for the areas of terrible governance. particularly, The Millennium assignment Account, proposed with the aid of President G. W. Bush in March 2002 and authorized by the Congress, guarantees to deliver enormous new flows of foreign assistance to low-income countries which can be âruling justly, investing in their own people, and inspiring financial freedomâ. greater mainly, U.S. navy and police useful resource to forty seven poorly appearing states, analyzed in a big studies performed via a suppose-tank within the States, commenced to multiply in 2002, so that taken collectively those countries obtained 114 instances as a lot assistance in 2004 as they did in 2000. the bulk of money went to seven nations labeled as âconflict on terrorâ states â Afghanistan, Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Yemen, Indonesia, Tajikistan and Djibouti. U.S. authorities files claim that an underlying motive of resource to all of these states is to encourage human rights and pluralistic politics. In reality, on 9/11 three of those seven international locations had been legally banned from receiving U.S. security assistance by using foreign help Act which prohibited aid to international locations whose authorities reached energy thru a navy coup and nations developing nuclear guns. moreover, Congress had prohibited most resource to Indonesiaâs security forces because of critical human rights issues. however, the Bush management waived those prohibitions inside the weeks following the assaults on 9-11.42 The aid become channeled for various purposes, frequently guns and equipment, but also even meals, uniforms, and salaries for some militaries in vital Asia so unestablished, unprofessional or underequpped. moreover, the united states educated 4.5 times as many military and police employees from the war on terror nations in 2003 because it did in 2000, except for joint army operations and joint schooling sports, which do no longer appear in respectable reports to Congress. inside the identical research, every other institution of 12 poorly acting states had been categorized as strategically important: Georgia, Nigeria, Kenya, Azerbaijan, Ethiopia, Guinea, Eritrea, Cameroon, Zambia, Chad, Tanzania and Niger. The principal U.S. hobby serv>
