We can work on Book review on the broken ladder

Book Review (3-4 pages)
Your book review should be insightful and based on your analysis of the text. I am not looking for a retelling of the book. Rather, I am looking for your thoughts on the book in regards to your understanding of American government and politics. Be specific and clear. It is you job as the writer to ensure the reader understands your thesis. Thus, your links need to be well thought out, clearly explained, and demonstrative of your critical thinking at work.
 Introduction & summary
o What are your initial impressions of the book? What are your thoughts on the first chapter? Why did you choose this book? This should be NO MORE than ½ page!!! Your paper is an analysis of the book not a retelling of its content.
 Background of the author…who is writing this book and why. This should be a paragraph.
o How are concepts/issues such as political power, founding principles, government, (in)equality, civic engagement, activism, voting, identity, American society, disenfranchisement, etc. addressed in the book? What are your lasting impressions of the books? What do you think motivated the author to write this book?
o Discuss the book’s structure and the author’s use of language and writing style.
 How does the author draw the reader in and keep the reader engaged? How, if at all, has this book impacted your views?
o Select a favorite quote or two and analyze them.
 Why does it appeal to you? What is the significance in relation to the topic?
 Conclusion
o What is your opinion about the book? Did the book live up to your expectations? Why or why not? What did you like most about the book? Least?

Sample Solution

The Ferguson Police Department (FPD) is a law authorization office living in Ferguson, Missouri. At present the association incorporates 45 dispatched officials and 17 non military personnel care staff for an aggregate of 62 workers (City of Ferguson, 2018). The FPD prides itself on their activities of securing Ferguson residents lives and property through the implementation of laws and laws, just as help with crisis restorative administrations. Notwithstanding these administrations, the office additionally gives an assortment of network activities planned for averting wrongdoing. A portion of the projects incorporate the D.A.R.E. program, Community Emergency Response Team (CERT), and giving school Resource Officers (City of Ferguson, 2018). The FPD has had numerous issues in late history, two of them being the absence of responsibility held by officials and absence of enhancement in the office prompting network doubt. History: The FPD was set up in 1894, that year Ferguson was consolidated into a city. In 2010, the city had a populace of 21,203 individuals with 67% being of African-American plunge. The police office was not administered with portrayal of its neighborhood racial cosmetics with 94% of its area of expertise being white, alongside the Chief of Police (Wilson C., and Wilson, S. 2015). Until the 1960s, Ferguson was a “nightfall town”, which means African Americans were prohibited from the City after dim. The City would close off the principle street from Kinloch, a poor, all-dark suburb, “with chain and development materials however kept a subsequent street open during the day so servants and babysitters could land from Kinloch to positions in Ferguson.”(The Making of Ferguson, 2016) About 10 years back, the FPD had its previously disconnected episode prompting a string of different outrages. On September 20, 2009, Henry Davis, an African American male, was wrongly captured when Ferguson cops mistook him for another Henry Davis. At the point when Davis opposed entering the prison cell, an official instantly pushed him, to which Davis fought back by striking the official in the face. The other 3 officials bound Davis because of his viciousness and the official he struck ran and kicked him in the head. At the point when lawful specialists got included the police gave them an inappropriate video recording of the occurrence and afterward asserted they had recorded over the genuine tape. Davis was then accused of devastation of property for seeping on the cops’ regalia (Shapiro, 2014). This occurrence actuated pressure between the police and the residents of Ferguson, all the more explicitly, white officials and the African-American populace. The occurrence that put Ferguson on the inside phase of universal news was the passing of Michael Brown on account of the FPD. On August ninth, 2014, a short showdown between official Darren Wilson and African-American resident, Michael Brown, occured in which Wilson allegedly told Brown “to get the f*** off the road” while Brown and a companion were strolling out and about (Wilson C., and Wilson, S. 2015). The police showed that Brown attempted to take the officials weapon and beat him with it while Wilson was still in his watch vehicle. Dark colored at that point fled from the official and a couple of seconds after the fact, a few shots were discharged by the official while Brown was purportedly confronting him with his hands brought up in an indication of accommodation. This brought about Brown kicking the bucket from discharge wounds, approximately 20-30 feet from the site of the underlying battle. It was later uncovered that Brown was unarmed (Wilson C., and Wilson, S. 2015). This disaster spread everywhere throughout the world and was the first energy for the Black Lives Matter development. This started fights everywhere throughout the United States which concentrated on out of line treatment by law implementation to ethnic minorities (Hafner, 2016). Culture and Strategy While the official statement of purpose of the FPD is that “The Ferguson Police Department gives assurance of life and property in Ferguson through the implementation of laws and mandates and help with crisis restorative administrations.” (City of Ferguson, 2018), it keeps on repudiating itself by showing a culture of misuse and prejudice. In a report managed by the Department of Justice, it was discovered that law requirement exercises were driven by strain to raise income, as opposed to by real causes. This incorporates misrepresenting reports, unjustifiable traffic stops, and illicit hunts. A few cases showed that the risk of prison time was frequently used to drive installment for minor infractions, for example, illicit stopping, however when prison time was served it wasn’t recorded by the court. This is a case of the reasonable absence of responsibility that cops are dependent upon, enabling them to act in unlawful ways without any outcomes, utilizing their uniform and identification as insurance (Berman, M., and Lowery, W. 2015). The way of life inside the FPD likewise cultivates and empowers bigotry, with generalizations against African-American residents being transparently passed around and followed up on. This racial predisposition starts from the upper degrees of the board, appeared by Ferguson authorities, including police administrators and chiefs, trading messages containing clear racial inclination. For instance, one email guessed that Barack Obama wouldn’t stay as President for a really long time since “what dark man holds a solid employment for a long time.” This supremacist action inside the FPD shows itself in its outside activities, in which there is clear victimization ethnic minorities. African-Americans represent 85% of traffic stops, 90% of references, and 93% of captures, regardless of just making up 67% of the populace (Wilson C., and Wilson, S. 2015). These charges are regularly unlawful in nature also, with the officials every now and again keeping individuals without sensible doubt and capturing individuals without reasonable justification. These unlawful practices are just energized by directors, as they are increasingly worried about the quantity of references and captures that officials produce, instead of the authenticity of the references and captures. One cop even conceded that he was prepared to capture when residents would decline to give recognizable proof, in spite of it being the residents’ entitlement to do as such. Once more, these practices are energized inside the police office, and there is no framework to guarantee responsibility. Remarks made by a boss recommend that there are fundamental estimates incorporated with place that consider reports to go unwritten and unapproved, with 600 reports that had not been affirmed over a multi month time frame in 2014 (Wilson C., and Wilson, S. 2015). In general, the way of life at the FPD is one that energizes income age and bigotry, without any measures set up to consider officials responsible for their illegal practices. Issue 1: Lack of Accountability for unlawful and exploitative activities The FPD’s Chief of Police, who admitted to that preceding the Michael Brown episode, he imagined that the connection between the office and the network was on favorable terms. The Chief of Police’s absence of comprehension for the genuine condition of relations between the residents and the office says a lot to the absence of correspondence between floor-level representatives and upper-administration. This absence of correspondence effectively prompts an absence of responsibility because of a wide number of unlawful and unscrupulous FPD official activities not being accounted for (Department of Justice, 2015). FPD officials who misuse their capacity are infrequently considered responsible and seldom answer for their own behavior. Before the shooting of Michael Brown, there were at that point various reports of FPD officials abusing African-American inhabitants of Ferguson by calling them racial slurs, physical animosity, and weapon brutality. The African-American occupants recorded various objections against the FPD officials, anyway these grumblings were met with quietness. This reaction further caused office network relations to decay to the point wherein larger part of Ferguson’s inhabitants depicted making a report to the police office as “worthless” (Department of Justice, 2015). In the official FPD strategy, it obviously expresses that officials must “never deter any resident from logging an objection.” (City of Ferguson, 2018). This strategy was accounted for to be legitimately negated by an anonymous FPD chief who more than once would not address grievances from Ferguson inhabitants, venturing to such an extreme as punishing FPD officials who took objections (1). In one occurrence, a City representative relates being “addressed by means of email” by a FPD skipper for taking an objection . In another example, a man needing to report extreme power being utilized by FPD officials was undermined with prison time if a protest was made. This refusal to acknowledge grumblings could be taken as the FPD skipper’s refusal to take on obligations to play out their occupations morally and to acknowledge responsibility for the FPD’s unlawful and dishonest activities. Moreover, the FPD chief still can’t seem to get any subsequent activities, and the underlying grumblings against the FPD were never logged or examined (Department of Justice, 2015). It ought to be noticed that the FPD’s treatment of its residents emulate Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison Experiment. In Zimbardo’s jail recreation, 24 understudies were part similarly and haphazardly doled out the job of jail watchmen or detainee. Initially phases of the trial, the 12 understudies chose to be detainees were embarrassed and undermined. This embarrassment unequivocally mirrors the manner in which the FPD officials obnoxiously misuse the African-American occupants of Ferguson. Besides, while the gatekeepers weren’t given any proper directions to be watches, they were given a sort of opportunity that enabled them to work inside free points of confinement. This opportunity converted into an absence of responsibility for the gatekeepers which thusly brought about the watchmen being basically “liberated” from the repercussions of their activities also. The identification, uniform and shades went about as a kind of veil for the jail watches. These things a>

Is this question part of your assignment?

Place order