Your essay should be formatted into 3 paragraphs as outlined below, and must CLEARLY address the prompts:
- Start with a generally introduction to the episode, talk about the theme of the episode and offer some insight into how that theme could be represented through modern art or culture.
- Then go on to discuss the individual artist youâve chosen. Your response should be primarily subjective and based on what you saw in the video. No additional research is necessary. Be sure to address the following:
Which artist from the episode did you choose and why?
What were your impressions of the artistâs personality?
What media does the artist work in?
What is the content of their work? Are there recurring themes or images? Be sure to mention SPECIFIC works discussed in the episode.
How might this artistâs work relate to the theme of this episode (Identity, Ecology, Paradox, etc.), and this unit (Originality, Utopia, Reason, etc)?
- Conclude by summarizing your main thoughts on the episode and the artist you selected with a general statement about the episode, and how it helped you to better understand contemporary art. Finally, prompt your classmates with a question or thought for discussion.
Sample Solution
Theoretical President Obama is known to move style during his talks through his residency. The style-move of the President Obama discourse can meant to the crowd. As displayed in the examination, President Obama does intentionally utilize the African America Vernacular English variation in the discourse while addressing the Black group of spectators. Anyway the African America Vernacular English variations can likewise be located in his discourse before the non-dark group of spectators which can mean to his talking style. One can likewise derive that President Obama make style-move to offshoot himself with the group of spectators keeping his individual personality flawless. Simultaneously, he picks a specific style-move all together for the group of spectators to comprehend and identify with his discourse. Presentation For quite a while, the idea of “style” embraced by an individual in discourse has been a subject of discussion among the sociolinguistics. Investigates have attempted to pinpoint precisely what is the constitution of style and for what reason do individuals utilize a particular style in a social occasion. “Style” has many significance for the sociolinguistics. For a few, it implies the decision of discourse an individual makes when speaking with other. Notwithstanding, everybody is conceded to the point that an individual changes his/her talking style dependent on the group of spectators and the subject under dialog. In this unique circumstance, one can likewise characterize “style” as a code picked for a particular discourse. The code incorporates the tone of an individual, the word picked and the structure of the sentences and so forth. (Chime, p.145-147) In any case, style is additionally reliant on the tongue of the speaker. It very well may be regiolect or sociolect. The thought is that each individual talks in an alternate style which depends on what their identity is and where they have a place from. Be that as it may, inside in explicit colloquial style, a speaker can picked diverse style to talk dependent on the group of spectators, condition and point and so on. This demonstrates the intricacy of the idea driving “style.” On the other hand, there is another idea known as “style moving” which is firmly identified with style. For instance when a speaker begins to talk in the nearby language, he/she is attempting to set up closeness with the group of spectators. (Ringer, p.145-147) In United States, the style-move in President Obama’s discourses is under incredible discussions. Individuals have commonly seen that there is perceptible diverse in the way to express President Obama in various addresses. The variety in the elocution is a discussion theme between the two investigators and scholastics. It has been translated as the indexical of African America Vernacular English. It very well may be said that President Obama can move carefully and serenely from standard American English (white) to “dark language.” This paper assesses the speculation raised freely and scholastically for Obama’s discourse for example president takes part in style moving. The accompanying areas will depict the strategies and utilized for assessing the speculation. Besides, the paper will likewise talk about the outcome and examine the results in a different area. Techniques So as to assess the style moving in Obama’s discourse, the paper will utilize four addresses of President Obama between January 2008 and September 2011. The addresses which will be assessed are: Congressional Black Caucus Foundation which will be alluded as CBC; discourse at Hampton University which will be alluded as Hampton University; King’s Church discourse and A More Perfect Union. The addresses picked for the investigation spread a similar subject in this manner to ensure that number of outside factor influencing the discourse are limited while making “crowd” as the main overseeing variable of the talks. The quantity of talks for investigation is kept four as to remember the restricted extent of the paper. As the reason for the paper is to recognize the conceivable etymological highlights utilized by President Obama subsequently there are terms utilized all through the paper: “AAVE” which means to the ethnolect called African America Vernacular English and “GAm which signifies to General (standard) English” which is non-morally stamped variation of American English. (Detert, Rasmussen and Kristensen, p.7) The initial phase in to begin the examination of the fours talks to discover an outcome for the theory. This incorporates breaking down and denoting the discourse for the phonetic factors which can uncover factors that can be recognized as indexical of African American Vernacular English. For the reason, a PC programming known as ELAN is utilized. ELAN is sound preparing programming. It helps in stamping articulations in a discourse and commenting on the expressions with various qualities. Anyway the framework can’t recognize the phonetic contrasts in the discourse. Accordingly the phonetic distinction will be assessed by the audience members. (Detert, Rasmussen and Kristensen, p.7) The ELAN programming has been use to check and explain every one of the factors in the inquiry (see Appendix A). Every factor has been given a worth. The factors have likewise been set apart inside the classes for example “General American English” or “African America Vernacular English”. For instance, if there is an explanation with an (ING) variable in the discourse, the unmitigated comment denotes the comment as either GAm or African America Vernacular English. The imprints give us the proportion that recognizes the two classifications. The proportions will give us a factual perspective on the quantity of events of the factors in the discourse. Moreover, the paper additionally examines the vowel utilized in the discourse in a constrained extension. (Detert, Rasmussen and Kristensen, p.8) Results The exploration is centered around discovering whether the variations indexical of African America Vernacular English is because of regular stream or is activated purposefully. The point was to decide if there is a relative movement in the utilization of African America Vernacular English variations in the discourses as it would dismiss the theory for example to utilize African America Vernacular English for accomplishing key objectives by President Obama. To dissect the cracks, every discourse was partitioned into a ten moment interims. Tragically the strategy did not give an exact proof of the relative movement for example featuring the (HAPPY) tokens by recovering just the orthographic â y words did not draw any critical movement in variations. Besides, the recovery of (HAPPY) vowels toward the part of the arrangement which is trailed by a short respite did not draw a huge outcome as well. Notwithstanding the way that every discourse and every ten moment interim has been firmly broke down for number of conceivable outcomes, the creator couldn’t locate any general movement of the utilization of African America Vernacular English in the talks. Thusly the strategy won’t be sought after any further. Whatever other significant factor that impacts the utilization of variations indexical of African America Vernacular English is the subject of the discourse. So as to discover the impact of the point on the proportion of the African America Vernacular English to Gam variations, the examination partitioned the dataset into five unique themes. The five classes wherein the subjects were separated are: African Americans; references from Bible; The United States of America; individual contemplations and experience of President Obama and the classification as indicated by the topic of the discourse. It is anything but difficult to assess and examine the theory when the discourse has a similar point of exchange while the group of spectators is unique. One can without much of a stretch bring up whether a point can trigger the utilization of variations of the two varieties being referred to. It is additionally the point of the investigation to associate the general discoveries of various to help make it conceivable the recovery of the two variations dependent on the subject and the assessment of whether certain themes cause the utilization of high or lower number of variations indexical of African America Vernacular English. Lamentably, the assessment uncovers that no theme incited any noteworthy utilization of variations indexical of African America Vernacular English. Much the same as the past recovery of the (HAPPY) vowels in orthographic uncovered a higher number of African America Vernacular English variations, breaking down (HAPPY) vowels for the subjects likewise uncovered higher number of African America Vernacular English variations. This investigation did not demonstrate any huge outcomes. At last, it tends to be said that for the present research the subjects were isolated all around extensively. Anyway in future, definite division of the points can deliver better outcomes. Anyway the theory of the utilization of higher recurrence of African America Vernacular English variations can be affected by the theme of the discourse won’t be sought after further. In the accompanying area, the creator will display the quantity of the examination and the proportions accommodated the outcomes. Exchange This area shows the yields on the assessment of the four addresses of President Obama. The investigation done will be to respond to the inquiry whether Obama move style dependent on the crowd and whether Obama utilizes the African America Vernacular English style before the Black group of spectators or not. In the discourse, we will attempt to interface the inner finding of the talks with the outer setting. It is said that the discourse is incredibly impacted by the social setting of the speaker or the discourse. Along these lines for the assessment the group of spectators of the discourse in contemplated and President Obama’s own experience can likewise help in giving knowledge into whether Obama utilizes African America Vernacular English variations when conveying discourse before the African Americans. (Chime, p.141) In the event that one attempts to assessed President Obama’s discourse against the rundown of exceptional phonological African America Vernacular English trademark, one can discover that the above examination won’t most likely give verification to term Obama’s discourse style an African American Vernacular English. By utilizing a rundown of phonological African America Vernac>
Theoretical President Obama is known to move style during his talks through his residency. The style-move of the President Obama discourse can meant to the crowd. As displayed in the examination, President Obama does intentionally utilize the African America Vernacular English variation in the discourse while addressing the Black group of spectators. Anyway the African America Vernacular English variations can likewise be located in his discourse before the non-dark group of spectators which can mean to his talking style. One can likewise derive that President Obama make style-move to offshoot himself with the group of spectators keeping his individual personality flawless. Simultaneously, he picks a specific style-move all together for the group of spectators to comprehend and identify with his discourse. Presentation For quite a while, the idea of “style” embraced by an individual in discourse has been a subject of discussion among the sociolinguistics. Investigates have attempted to pinpoint precisely what is the constitution of style and for what reason do individuals utilize a particular style in a social occasion. “Style” has many significance for the sociolinguistics. For a few, it implies the decision of discourse an individual makes when speaking with other. Notwithstanding, everybody is conceded to the point that an individual changes his/her talking style dependent on the group of spectators and the subject under dialog. In this unique circumstance, one can likewise characterize “style” as a code picked for a particular discourse. The code incorporates the tone of an individual, the word picked and the structure of the sentences and so forth. (Chime, p.145-147) In any case, style is additionally reliant on the tongue of the speaker. It very well may be regiolect or sociolect. The thought is that each individual talks in an alternate style which depends on what their identity is and where they have a place from. Be that as it may, inside in explicit colloquial style, a speaker can picked diverse style to talk dependent on the group of spectators, condition and point and so on. This demonstrates the intricacy of the idea driving “style.” On the other hand, there is another idea known as “style moving” which is firmly identified with style. For instance when a speaker begins to talk in the nearby language, he/she is attempting to set up closeness with the group of spectators. (Ringer, p.145-147) In United States, the style-move in President Obama’s discourses is under incredible discussions. Individuals have commonly seen that there is perceptible diverse in the way to express President Obama in various addresses. The variety in the elocution is a discussion theme between the two investigators and scholastics. It has been translated as the indexical of African America Vernacular English. It very well may be said that President Obama can move carefully and serenely from standard American English (white) to “dark language.” This paper assesses the speculation raised freely and scholastically for Obama’s discourse for example president takes part in style moving. The accompanying areas will depict the strategies and utilized for assessing the speculation. Besides, the paper will likewise talk about the outcome and examine the results in a different area. Techniques So as to assess the style moving in Obama’s discourse, the paper will utilize four addresses of President Obama between January 2008 and September 2011. The addresses which will be assessed are: Congressional Black Caucus Foundation which will be alluded as CBC; discourse at Hampton University which will be alluded as Hampton University; King’s Church discourse and A More Perfect Union. The addresses picked for the investigation spread a similar subject in this manner to ensure that number of outside factor influencing the discourse are limited while making “crowd” as the main overseeing variable of the talks. The quantity of talks for investigation is kept four as to remember the restricted extent of the paper. As the reason for the paper is to recognize the conceivable etymological highlights utilized by President Obama subsequently there are terms utilized all through the paper: “AAVE” which means to the ethnolect called African America Vernacular English and “GAm which signifies to General (standard) English” which is non-morally stamped variation of American English. (Detert, Rasmussen and Kristensen, p.7) The initial phase in to begin the examination of the fours talks to discover an outcome for the theory. This incorporates breaking down and denoting the discourse for the phonetic factors which can uncover factors that can be recognized as indexical of African American Vernacular English. For the reason, a PC programming known as ELAN is utilized. ELAN is sound preparing programming. It helps in stamping articulations in a discourse and commenting on the expressions with various qualities. Anyway the framework can’t recognize the phonetic contrasts in the discourse. Accordingly the phonetic distinction will be assessed by the audience members. (Detert, Rasmussen and Kristensen, p.7) The ELAN programming has been use to check and explain every one of the factors in the inquiry (see Appendix A). Every factor has been given a worth. The factors have likewise been set apart inside the classes for example “General American English” or “African America Vernacular English”. For instance, if there is an explanation with an (ING) variable in the discourse, the unmitigated comment denotes the comment as either GAm or African America Vernacular English. The imprints give us the proportion that recognizes the two classifications. The proportions will give us a factual perspective on the quantity of events of the factors in the discourse. Moreover, the paper additionally examines the vowel utilized in the discourse in a constrained extension. (Detert, Rasmussen and Kristensen, p.8) Results The exploration is centered around discovering whether the variations indexical of African America Vernacular English is because of regular stream or is activated purposefully. The point was to decide if there is a relative movement in the utilization of African America Vernacular English variations in the discourses as it would dismiss the theory for example to utilize African America Vernacular English for accomplishing key objectives by President Obama. To dissect the cracks, every discourse was partitioned into a ten moment interims. Tragically the strategy did not give an exact proof of the relative movement for example featuring the (HAPPY) tokens by recovering just the orthographic â y words did not draw any critical movement in variations. Besides, the recovery of (HAPPY) vowels toward the part of the arrangement which is trailed by a short respite did not draw a huge outcome as well. Notwithstanding the way that every discourse and every ten moment interim has been firmly broke down for number of conceivable outcomes, the creator couldn’t locate any general movement of the utilization of African America Vernacular English in the talks. Thusly the strategy won’t be sought after any further. Whatever other significant factor that impacts the utilization of variations indexical of African America Vernacular English is the subject of the discourse. So as to discover the impact of the point on the proportion of the African America Vernacular English to Gam variations, the examination partitioned the dataset into five unique themes. The five classes wherein the subjects were separated are: African Americans; references from Bible; The United States of America; individual contemplations and experience of President Obama and the classification as indicated by the topic of the discourse. It is anything but difficult to assess and examine the theory when the discourse has a similar point of exchange while the group of spectators is unique. One can without much of a stretch bring up whether a point can trigger the utilization of variations of the two varieties being referred to. It is additionally the point of the investigation to associate the general discoveries of various to help make it conceivable the recovery of the two variations dependent on the subject and the assessment of whether certain themes cause the utilization of high or lower number of variations indexical of African America Vernacular English. Lamentably, the assessment uncovers that no theme incited any noteworthy utilization of variations indexical of African America Vernacular English. Much the same as the past recovery of the (HAPPY) vowels in orthographic uncovered a higher number of African America Vernacular English variations, breaking down (HAPPY) vowels for the subjects likewise uncovered higher number of African America Vernacular English variations. This investigation did not demonstrate any huge outcomes. At last, it tends to be said that for the present research the subjects were isolated all around extensively. Anyway in future, definite division of the points can deliver better outcomes. Anyway the theory of the utilization of higher recurrence of African America Vernacular English variations can be affected by the theme of the discourse won’t be sought after further. In the accompanying area, the creator will display the quantity of the examination and the proportions accommodated the outcomes. Exchange This area shows the yields on the assessment of the four addresses of President Obama. The investigation done will be to respond to the inquiry whether Obama move style dependent on the crowd and whether Obama utilizes the African America Vernacular English style before the Black group of spectators or not. In the discourse, we will attempt to interface the inner finding of the talks with the outer setting. It is said that the discourse is incredibly impacted by the social setting of the speaker or the discourse. Along these lines for the assessment the group of spectators of the discourse in contemplated and President Obama’s own experience can likewise help in giving knowledge into whether Obama utilizes African America Vernacular English variations when conveying discourse before the African Americans. (Chime, p.141) In the event that one attempts to assessed President Obama’s discourse against the rundown of exceptional phonological African America Vernacular English trademark, one can discover that the above examination won’t most likely give verification to term Obama’s discourse style an African American Vernacular English. By utilizing a rundown of phonological African America Vernac>
