Write an essay that analyzes what makes different kinds of sources credible. How does Watters credibly discuss Henrich et al.’s research without the same research credentials? Why does Serano, a published scientist in biochemistry and biophysics, choose not to reference any scientific publications in her essay? Why does the research paper by Henrich et al. include so many more citations than Watters’ article about it in Pacific Standard? How do the different contexts of Pacific Standard, the journal Behavioral and Brain Sciences, and the book Yes Means Yes! shape audience expectations for what constitutes credibility? When does personal experience serve as credible evidence, and how do authors choose between different kinds of evidence for support? How do first-person writing and disclosures of personal opinion or “bias” affect an author’s credibility? You must address all three sources in your essay, though not necessarily to the same degree.