Order Description
Require the research of a case study on the topic of Leadership perspectives. Example provided in the attachment with the details of the assessment and readings on the specific topic. Require 5 references sources. I require the format in a word and not in a presentation format as indicated. disregard any references to this being a team or group work.

9/5/2016 ORG30002: Assessment 2
https://ilearn.swin.edu.au/bbcswebdav/pid5707746dtcontentrid30093041_
2/courses/2016SO2ORG30002215484/
Assessments/assessment2.
html 1/4
Teaching period 2, 2016
ORG30002: Leadership in Context
Assessment 2: Team presentation and discussion
board moderation
Time limit: 10 minutes (+/- 10%)
Weighting: 30%
Due date: See schedule; ᴀ밄rst presentation due 9am AEST Monday 15 August 2016 (beginning Week
6)
Assessment overview
For this assessment, you will be allocated to a team (4 students) and assigned one of the weekly topics.
Your team will choose one speciᴀ밄c area from your assigned topic to research and you will present your
ᴀ밄ndings as a digital presentation using Prezi.
For example, if your team is assigned Week 6: Contingency and situational leadership, you might like to
focus on contingency theory, or the situational leadership model, and how it is similar or diᴀ洅erent to one
or more of the other theories or models of leadership explored in the week.
The aim of the presentation is to share your research ᴀ밄ndings and generate and engage in discussion of
the weekly topic with other members of the Learning group. By generating and engaging your Learning
group in discussion, you are developing your communication skills and commentary of various issues
surrounding leadership in context.
Assessment details
Your team’s presentation is a visual source of information and summary of the work that you have done
during the research process, referring to, and extending on, a case of leadership in context from a
current issue in the media, your eText, or presented in the Learning materials of the unit, relevant to the
week of study. The purpose of your presentation is to convey your main points and key ᴀ밄ndings to other
students in your Learning group and to then generate and engage in discussion on the topic with your
Learning group.
You will be marked on how you work together as a team, with team cohesion underpinning all
assessment criteria. Choose an online space to collaborate where you can chat, upload links and ᴀ밄les for
sharing and work together to complete the presentation (e.g. the unit wiki, a Google Doc, or other). Invite
your eLA to your online discussions.
In your teams:
9/5/2016 ORG30002: Assessment 2
https://ilearn.swin.edu.au/bbcswebdav/pid5707746dtcontentrid30093041_
2/courses/2016SO2ORG30002215484/
Assessments/assessment2.
html 2/4
1. Research your selected topic and a relevant case study, then summarise your key ᴀ밄ndings and
conclusions and present it in a Prezi presentation.
2. Feel free to structure the presentation in any way that you think is appropriate. However, the
presentation must contain the key ᴀ밄ndings of your research and meet the assessment criteria.
With this is mind, your presentation should contain the following key information:
your research topic and reference to a relevant case study
a summary of your key ᴀ밄ndings
your conclusion.
3. Nominate a team member to post your team’s presentation to the discussion board by the due
date and time, in addition to a question (or questions), case, scenario or conundrum (for example)
… something to generate discussion relating to the topic among your Learning group.
4. As a team, drive the activity in the discussion forum for the week, together with your teammates.
Submission details
Topic Due
Team A Contingency and situational leadership 9am (AEST) Monday 15 August
Team B Power, politics, inᴀ밄uence and crisis 9am (AEST) Monday 29 August
Team C Global leadership 9am (AEST) Monday 5 September
Team D Leading teams 9am (AEST) Monday 12 September
Team E Leadership development and succession 9am (AEST) Monday 19 September
Team F Leadership perspectives 9am (AEST) Monday 26 September
Please submit your Assessment 2 via the discussion board. If your eLA has not been able to access your
collaborative space, they may require you to submit a copy of this. More detailed information is available
in the Assessment 2 folder in Blackboard.
Assessment criteria
1. Content. The presentation focuses on a particular aspect of the weekly topic and relevant
leadership theory.
2. Structure. There is an appropriate balance between text and graphics. The presentation is visually
engaging, organised and has clear headings and subheadings. Prompts are provided to generate
discussion with and among the Learning Group.
3. Written expression. Attention has been paid to spelling, grammar and referencing.
9/5/2016 ORG30002: Assessment 2
https://ilearn.swin.edu.au/bbcswebdav/pid5707746dtcontentrid30093041_
2/courses/2016SO2ORG30002215484/
Assessments/assessment2.
html 3/4
4. Working in a team. There is evidence that you participate in the teamwork and worked eᴀ洅ectively
as a team member to support the development of the presentation and discussion prompts.
Your work will be assessed using the following marking guide:
Criteria No Pass Pass
50-59%
Credit
60-69%
Distinction
70-79%
High Distinction
80-100%
Content
50%
Did not meet
criterion.
Presentation
presents
information on
chosen topic.
The value of
reᴀ밄ective practice
and/or application
of self-reᴀ밄ection to
develop an
awareness of
leadership
contributions is
mentioned in the
presentation.
The contribution of
shared meaning
and values in
shaping
organisational
culture and/or
building social
capital in
increasingly
complex
organisational
environments is
mentioned.
Presentation
presents
information on the
topic and draws on
a relevant case
study, learning
material and wider
research.
The value of
reᴀ밄ective practice
and/or application
of self-reᴀ밄ection to
develop an
awareness of
diversity and/or
personal
leadership
contributions is
mentioned in the
presentation.
An awareness of
the contribution of
shared meaning
and values in
shaping
organisational
culture and/or
building social
capital in
increasingly
complex
organisational
environments is
shown.
Presentation
presents valuable
information on
chosen topic, and
draws on a
relevant case
study, learning
material and wider
research including
academic sources
external to unit
content.
In the context of
the case selected,
the value of
reᴀ밄ective practice
and application of
self-reᴀ밄ection to
develop an
awareness of
diversity and/or
personal
leadership
contributions is
discussed in the
presentation.
The contribution of
shared meaning
and values in
shaping
organisational
culture and/or
building social
capital in
increasingly
complex
organisational
environments is
incorporated.
Students have
gone beyond
merely presenting
the research
available via
learning material
and wider
research.
Presentation
provides the
Learning Group
with new insights
and resources that
are informed by
the independent
research
conducted by the
team.
In the context of
the case selected,
the value of
reᴀ밄ective practice
and application of
self-reᴀ밄ection to
develop an
awareness of
diversity and
personal
leadership
contributions is
discussed in the
presentation.
The contribution of
shared meaning
and values in
shaping
organisational
culture and
building social
capital in
increasingly
complex
organisational
environments is
incorporated.
9/5/2016 ORG30002: Assessment 2
https://ilearn.swin.edu.au/bbcswebdav/pid5707746dtcontentrid30093041_
2/courses/2016SO2ORG30002215484/
Assessments/assessment2.
html 4/4
Structure
20%
Did not meet
criterion.
The ideas are
presented in a
logical order
however there is
room for
improvement in
structure.
Appropriate
balance between
text and graphics.
Organised with
clear headings and
subheadings.
Presentation
appears to be
constructed of
individually crafted
sections.
Prompt(s) are
provided to
generate Learning
Group discussion.
The ideas are
presented in a
well-structured and
logical order.
Appropriate
balance between
text and graphics.
Organised with
clear headings and
subheadings.
Presentation is
neat and
information is
communicated
clearly using
illustrations/
graphics where
appropriate.
Mostly well
presented,
however individual
elements are
obvious.
Prompt(s) are
provided to
generate Learning
Group discussion.
The ideas are
presented in a
well-structured and
logical order.
Appropriate
balance between
text and graphics.
Structurally
organised and has
clear headings and
subheadings.
Basic introduction
and conclusion
present.
Presentation is
visually engaging
and communicates
clearly using
illustrations/
graphics where
appropriate.
Well-presented
presentation,
however individual
elements could
have been united
more cohesively.
Prompt(s) are
provided to
generate Learning
Group discussion.
The ideas are
presented in a
well-structured and
logical order.
Excellent balance
between text and
graphics. Clear
structure with
subheadings.
Introduction
outlines purpose
and conclusion
summarises key
ᴀ밄ndings.
Presentation is
visually engaging
and communicates
clearly using
illustrations/
graphics where
appropriate.
The result is a
cohesive
presentation,
where individual
elements are
united seamlessly.
Prompt(s) are
provided to
generate Learning
Group discussion.
Written expression
10%
Did not meet
criterion.
Some errors
present in spelling,
grammar or
referencing.
Further
proofreading,
editing and greater
attention to detail
required.
In most parts, the
work is error free
for spelling and
grammar, and
referencing has
only very minor
errors.
The work is mostly
error free for
spelling and
grammar, and
referencing has
high attention to
detail.
Spelling, grammar,
academic writing
and referencing
style are excellent
and consistent
across all aspects.
Individual marks
Working in a team
20%
Did not meet
criterion.
Evidence of your
limited
involvement in
team planning,
activity and
contribution to
ᴀ밄nal presentation,
to generate and
extend discussion
during the week.
Evidence
(accessible to your
eLA) of your
involvement in
team planning,
activity and
contribution to
ᴀ밄nal presentation
and Learning
Group discussion
prompt(s), to
generate and
extend discussion
during the week.
Evidence (freely
accessible to your
eLA) of signiᴀ밄cant
involvement in
team planning,
activity and
contribution to
ᴀ밄nal presentation
and Learning
Group discussion
prompt(s), to
generate and
extend discussion
during the week.
Evidence (freely
accessible to your
eLA) of signiᴀ밄cant
team involvement
in planning, activity
and contribution to
ᴀ밄nal presentation
and Learning
Group discussion
prompt(s), to
generate and
extend discussion
during the week.