The introduction for the 1619 Project makes the argument that America’s âfirst birth dateâ should NOT be July 1776, but August 1619. The author makes the claim that this marks the countryâs true origin. Do you agree or disagree with that statement? Use one of the essays- Sample Solution profiles. The only limitations that someRead more about We can work on America’s “first birth date”[…]
Tag: birth
We can work on Birth of a nation
https://youtu.be/aWroitR49Uchttps://calstatela.kanopy.com/video/ethnic-notions-0The login info will be available once you confirm the orderhttps://youtu.be/wyXRb3YTDUU Using D.W. Griffith’s Birth of A Nation and what you learned from the movie Ethnic Notions, what racialstereotypes/”Single Stories” that were used to create an understanding of black people in both the north andsouth that helped/help to maintain the system of white dominance inRead more about We can work on Birth of a nation[…]
We can work on The “birth” of Buddhism
What were the social and cultural conditions that informed and set the stage for the birth and spread of Buddhism?I would suggest focusing on either the “birth” of Buddhism, or a particular “social and cultural condition” that shaped Buddhism into a single sect. That is, don’t try to summarize everything ⦠I’d rather have youRead more about We can work on The “birth” of Buddhism[…]
We can work on Weights of 50 babies at birth
The project is broken into two parts. You will complete Part I in Week 6 and Part II in Week 7. In Week 6,Confidence Intervals will be explored and in Week 7 Hypothesis testing will be explored. A confidence interval is a defined range of values such that there is a specified probability that theRead more about We can work on Weights of 50 babies at birth[…]
We can work on Claudia is a 26-year-old mother of two G2P2, she recently delivered her last child 9 months ago, and has been using condoms for birth control for the last 7 months. Today she is requesting a more reliable birth control, she is not sure of her current pregnancy plans,
Claudia is a 26-year-old mother of two G2P2, she recently delivered her last child 9 months ago, and has been using condoms for birth control for the last 7 months. Today she is requesting a more reliable birth control, she is not sure of her current pregnancy plans, however, she does not wish to discussRead more about We can work on Claudia is a 26-year-old mother of two G2P2, she recently delivered her last child 9 months ago, and has been using condoms for birth control for the last 7 months. Today she is requesting a more reliable birth control, she is not sure of her current pregnancy plans,[…]
We can work on Birth a nation
Screen The Birth of a Nation (available on Netflix, Amazon Prime) and write a 3-page paper analyzing the film as a primary source. You should discuss how Griffith represents the American past in terms of the time in which the film was made. What issues does he address, and how does he address them? IfRead more about We can work on Birth a nation[…]
We can work on Law and Ethical Reasoning Name of Student Institutional Affiliation Law and Ethical Reasoning Living a will provide people with the opportunity to state their preferences about the type of medical treatment they can receive if they are unable to give informed consent (Rao, 2000). The living wills are useful in any case where the patient cannot state their medical choices. In a large number of states, pregnant women do not have equal right as other people to create and adhere to a living will. The justification for the exclusion of pregnant women is that they may not have considered the effects of their choices during pregnancy. These statutes claim to protect women who would be devastated to find out that the doctor continued with a life-ending treatment while in fact, she would have chosen to continue with life-sustaining treatment to give the fetus an opportunity to grow. Living wills for pregnant women are heavily influenced by the politics surrounding abortion. Most state legislatures have a clause to sidestep the living will as it is only logical to protect the life of the unborn baby by giving the incapacitated pregnant woman life-sustaining treatment. However, this decision does not consider that forcing medical care on the pregnant patient violates her autonomy as a woman. The pregnancy exemption laws impermissibly restrict the woman’s right to refuse unwanted medical intervention as well as their right to abortion. These exemptions also infringe on the pregnant woman’s ability to control their end of life healthcare, more commonly known as the “right to die” (Villarreal, 2018). In most cases, the illness or accident that incapacitates a pregnant woman also jeopardizes the health and survival of the fetus. Therefore, continuing the pregnancy is often futile. Maintaining a woman on life support is harmful to the fetus because ventilators and catheters often cause an infection that further jeopardizes the development of the fetus. The exemption of a pregnant woman from the right to enact a living will do not allow for the consideration of the pregnant woman’s pain, the growth of the unborn baby or the prognosis of the unborn baby (Villarreal, 2018). Pregnancy exemptions to living wills are unconstitutional, not only because they create an undue burden on the woman’s right to have an abortion before the fetus is viable but also because the state’s interest in the prospective life of the unborn baby cannot overrule a woman’s right to refuse medical care. In Planned Parenthood v. Casey, the court stated that women maintained the right to terminate a pregnancy before it was viable (Villarreal, 2018). However, the state’s interest in life would be allowed to proceed only if the restriction on the woman’s right to choose does not place an undue burden on the woman. If the woman is incapacitated due to injury or illness, continuing the pregnancy infringes on their right to choose by placing an undue burden on the woman (Epstein & Walker, 2013). Most states with the exemptions on pregnancy women coerce women into accepting unwanted medical care if it is possible that the fetus will grow to pave way for “live birth”; a standard that is vague and medically uncertain and therefore places an undue burden on the rights of women to abortion. In In re Quinlan, the court ruled that the individual’s right to privacy also includes the right to decline from unwanted medical care as well as the right to abortion (Rao, 2000). The ruling found that the state cannot compel unwanted medical care on people that have expressed their wish to stop life-sustaining medical care to medical professionals and others through the healthcare power of an attorney. This ruling should take precedence when a pregnant woman is incapacitated. The state’s interest in human life should not outweigh the person’s right to refuse unwanted medical care. Therefore, the state’s interest should not justify the violation of a woman’s bodily autonomy notwithstanding how far along she is in the pregnancy (Epstein & Walker, 2013). In my opinion, society should choose to maintain the woman’s autonomy over her body, above all else. If the patient is incapacitated with no signs of recovery, I will opt to discontinue treatment. Continuing to put a woman such as nancy under medical care would place a burden on her dying body to support a fetus. It would also lengthen the suffering of the patient. The purpose of medical care is to alleviate suffering not to increase it. Also, continuing to give medical care does not guarantee the survival of the fetus. It may also lead to the birth of an infant with severe defects. This infant would then begin a life with difficulties, and the chances of their survival would be minimized due to the lack of a mother. Continuing medical care also places financial stress on the family as well as the healthcare providers. Even though theoretically, the patients financial status should not determine the level of care they receive, in reality, it is among the most crucial factors in determining a patient’s access to healthcare. Therefore, society should consider the financial implications too. References Epstein, L., & Walker, T. G. (2013). Constitutional Law: Rights. Sage. Rao, R. (2000). Property, privacy, and the human body. BUL rev., 80, 359. Villarreal, E. (2018). Pregnancy and Living Wills: A Behavioral Economic Analysis. Yale LJF, 128, 1052.
We can work on The History of the Airbus 320 Airliner Aircraft, the birth and evolution of Airbus’ narrow body aircraft
An informative history of the birth and evolution of the Airbus 320 airliner and all variations of the A320, the 319, 318, 321 and 320 NEO. Include all technical information and a complete storied history of the Airbus 320 family from invention to today. minimum of ten pages in length (excluding the title, abstract, andRead more about We can work on The History of the Airbus 320 Airliner Aircraft, the birth and evolution of Airbus’ narrow body aircraft[…]