We can work on Non-Profit Fundraising Name Institution Affiliation Fundraising Klein (2009) describes the concept of conversion rate and he describes it as the proportion of first-time donors who provide a donation for the second time. According to the author the ideal conversion rate is roughly 40%. To have a higher conversion rate organization should ensure that they personalize their thank-you notes, spell donors’ names accurately, send them annual report, newsletter or any other kind of correspondence between sending them a money request. Also, the overall retention rate of major donors should be roughly 66%. Klein (2009) also describes the concept of fulfillment cost and this is what it costs an organization to keep a donor. Klein recommends that this cost should be roughly $3 and 10 yearly for every donor. Organizations should frequently go through their mailing list to ensure they do not keep records of people who cannot donate again. Notably, organizations aim to develop a donor base because it is the most unswerving way to sustain their operations overtime and also because foundation funding has turned out to be scarcer in the economy. Klein (2009) emphasizes that the lifeblood of stable and successful social change nonprofits is loyal donors. Klein’s article is related to nonprofit fundraising careers as it discusses various concepts related to fundraising such as how to attract and retain donors, and sources of money such as community funding. The book also describes who can be potential donors; that is people who believe in your organization’s work. Thus, the book deliberates on effective fundraising strategies such as reaching out to people who deeply care about the organization and those who support its mission as well as segmenting donors to establish appropriate relationships with them. Klein (2009) indicates that donors should be segmented based on their longevity of giving, frequency of giving and size of gift. Furthermore, the book is related to nonprofit fundraising careers as it describes how organizations should build relationships with donors though knowing them personally and approaching them to request for funds face-to-face and not just by communicating with them through e-mail or phone. Giving USA (2018) provides a synopsis of giving in 2017. As stated in the article total 2017 contributions were $410.02 billion of which 70% was provided by individuals, 16% by foundations, 9% by bequests and 5% by corporations. The recipients of these contributions by category were religion, education, human services, foundations, health, public society benefit, humanities, art and culture, international affairs as well as animals/environment. The article is related to nonprofit fundraising careers as it describes the major sources of donations and the factors that influence the amount these donors give. For instance, increase in corporate donations has been attributed to a 4.1% rise in corporate pre-tax profits. Jonker, Meehan & Iseminger (2014) states that money is important to nonprofits but their leaders often find it uncomfortable or challenging to request for it from people. Many extraordinary and bold nonprofits fail to assume bold fundraising efforts. Raising money is not easy, however, nonprofit leaders who want to see their organizations succeed must be committed to fundraising. Jonker, Meehan & Iseminger (2014) summarizes three proved principles that are followed by effective fundraisers; the first one is spend money to get money. Secondly, nonprofit leaders should go where there is money, for instance money is with individuals and not foundations; thus, nonprofits should target them. Thirdly, nonprofit leaders should overcome their fear/ discomfort of talking about finances by thinking in terms of their mission which is to change the world as opposed to just asking for money. The article is related to nonprofit fundraising careers as it discusses effective strategies of raising money such as planning for the top prospects through understanding their passion and interests as well as thanking donors to set stage for another gift. The authors also recommend that to attract funds easily, non-profit leaders should be good stewards of the offered donations. Foster, Kim & Christiansen (2009) describe their ten funding models based on three parameters; decision makers motivations, types of decision makers and source of funds. The ten funding models are heartfelt connector, beneficiary builder, member motivator, big bettor, public provider, public innovator, beneficiary broker, resource recycler, market maker and local nationalizer. The first three models; member motivator, beneficiary builder, and heartfelt connector are financed by individual donors. While big bettor is financed mostly by foundations, one or a few individuals. The beneficiary broker, policy innovator and public provider are mainly funded by the government. The resource recycler model is supported mostly by corporate funding while the local nationalizer and market maker have mixed funders. The article is related to nonprofit fundraising careers as it describes the various funding models and in return, fundraisers will get to the funding model that works best for their organization because different nonprofits take varying funding paths. Bassoff & Chandler (2001) describes the myths related no nonprofit fundraising and the reality shift associated with the myths. The article is related to non-profit fundraising career as it explains the reality behind some myths that may discourage fundraisers from seeking funds to support their mission. For instance, the myth that money comes from huge companies can mislead fundraisers by making them to target and spend on big companies while individuals are also major donors, yet if this myth is taken into consideration individuals may be ignored. References Bassoff, M., & Chandler, S. (2001). Notes from Relationshift: Revolutionary Fundraising. Author’s Choice Publishing. Foster, W. L., Kim, P., & Christiansen, B. (2009). Ten nonprofit funding models. Stanford Social Innovation Review Spring 2009 Giving USA (2018). An Overview of Giving in 2017. Jonker, K., Meehan III, W. F., & Iseminger, E. (2014). Fundraising Is Fundamental (If Not Always Fun). Stanford Social Innovation Review Klein, K. (2009). Reliable fundraising in unreliable times: What good causes need to know to survive and thrive (Vol. 33). John Wiley & Sons.

Non-Profit Fundraising Name Institution Affiliation Fundraising Klein (2009) describes the concept of conversion rate and he describes it as the proportion of first-time donors who provide a donation for the second time. According to the author the ideal conversion rate is roughly 40%. To have a higher conversion rate organization should ensure that they personalizeRead more about We can work on Non-Profit Fundraising Name Institution Affiliation Fundraising Klein (2009) describes the concept of conversion rate and he describes it as the proportion of first-time donors who provide a donation for the second time. According to the author the ideal conversion rate is roughly 40%. To have a higher conversion rate organization should ensure that they personalize their thank-you notes, spell donors’ names accurately, send them annual report, newsletter or any other kind of correspondence between sending them a money request. Also, the overall retention rate of major donors should be roughly 66%. Klein (2009) also describes the concept of fulfillment cost and this is what it costs an organization to keep a donor. Klein recommends that this cost should be roughly $3 and 10 yearly for every donor. Organizations should frequently go through their mailing list to ensure they do not keep records of people who cannot donate again. Notably, organizations aim to develop a donor base because it is the most unswerving way to sustain their operations overtime and also because foundation funding has turned out to be scarcer in the economy. Klein (2009) emphasizes that the lifeblood of stable and successful social change nonprofits is loyal donors. Klein’s article is related to nonprofit fundraising careers as it discusses various concepts related to fundraising such as how to attract and retain donors, and sources of money such as community funding. The book also describes who can be potential donors; that is people who believe in your organization’s work. Thus, the book deliberates on effective fundraising strategies such as reaching out to people who deeply care about the organization and those who support its mission as well as segmenting donors to establish appropriate relationships with them. Klein (2009) indicates that donors should be segmented based on their longevity of giving, frequency of giving and size of gift. Furthermore, the book is related to nonprofit fundraising careers as it describes how organizations should build relationships with donors though knowing them personally and approaching them to request for funds face-to-face and not just by communicating with them through e-mail or phone. Giving USA (2018) provides a synopsis of giving in 2017. As stated in the article total 2017 contributions were $410.02 billion of which 70% was provided by individuals, 16% by foundations, 9% by bequests and 5% by corporations. The recipients of these contributions by category were religion, education, human services, foundations, health, public society benefit, humanities, art and culture, international affairs as well as animals/environment. The article is related to nonprofit fundraising careers as it describes the major sources of donations and the factors that influence the amount these donors give. For instance, increase in corporate donations has been attributed to a 4.1% rise in corporate pre-tax profits. Jonker, Meehan & Iseminger (2014) states that money is important to nonprofits but their leaders often find it uncomfortable or challenging to request for it from people. Many extraordinary and bold nonprofits fail to assume bold fundraising efforts. Raising money is not easy, however, nonprofit leaders who want to see their organizations succeed must be committed to fundraising. Jonker, Meehan & Iseminger (2014) summarizes three proved principles that are followed by effective fundraisers; the first one is spend money to get money. Secondly, nonprofit leaders should go where there is money, for instance money is with individuals and not foundations; thus, nonprofits should target them. Thirdly, nonprofit leaders should overcome their fear/ discomfort of talking about finances by thinking in terms of their mission which is to change the world as opposed to just asking for money. The article is related to nonprofit fundraising careers as it discusses effective strategies of raising money such as planning for the top prospects through understanding their passion and interests as well as thanking donors to set stage for another gift. The authors also recommend that to attract funds easily, non-profit leaders should be good stewards of the offered donations. Foster, Kim & Christiansen (2009) describe their ten funding models based on three parameters; decision makers motivations, types of decision makers and source of funds. The ten funding models are heartfelt connector, beneficiary builder, member motivator, big bettor, public provider, public innovator, beneficiary broker, resource recycler, market maker and local nationalizer. The first three models; member motivator, beneficiary builder, and heartfelt connector are financed by individual donors. While big bettor is financed mostly by foundations, one or a few individuals. The beneficiary broker, policy innovator and public provider are mainly funded by the government. The resource recycler model is supported mostly by corporate funding while the local nationalizer and market maker have mixed funders. The article is related to nonprofit fundraising careers as it describes the various funding models and in return, fundraisers will get to the funding model that works best for their organization because different nonprofits take varying funding paths. Bassoff & Chandler (2001) describes the myths related no nonprofit fundraising and the reality shift associated with the myths. The article is related to non-profit fundraising career as it explains the reality behind some myths that may discourage fundraisers from seeking funds to support their mission. For instance, the myth that money comes from huge companies can mislead fundraisers by making them to target and spend on big companies while individuals are also major donors, yet if this myth is taken into consideration individuals may be ignored. References Bassoff, M., & Chandler, S. (2001). Notes from Relationshift: Revolutionary Fundraising. Author’s Choice Publishing. Foster, W. L., Kim, P., & Christiansen, B. (2009). Ten nonprofit funding models. Stanford Social Innovation Review Spring 2009 Giving USA (2018). An Overview of Giving in 2017. Jonker, K., Meehan III, W. F., & Iseminger, E. (2014). Fundraising Is Fundamental (If Not Always Fun). Stanford Social Innovation Review Klein, K. (2009). Reliable fundraising in unreliable times: What good causes need to know to survive and thrive (Vol. 33). John Wiley & Sons.[…]

We can work on The Walt Disney Company and Pixar, Inc.: To Acquire or Not to Acquire Student’s Name Institutional Affiliation The Walt Disney Company and Pixar, Inc.: To Acquire or Not to Acquire Part 1 Walt Disney Company has experienced various strategic issues. One of the issues is that the company has lost a significant percentage of its subscribers in the “Entertainment and Sports Programming Network (ESPN).” Currently, the company’s ESPN has few consumers compared to previous years. The primary reason why consumers have shifted from ESPN is the emergence of less expensive internet platforms (Alcacer et al., 2019). Before, customers watched sports with Disney, but currently, they can watch video sports using cheaper internet platforms. Over the years, the market position of Walt Disney had been high. The high market position was obtained through the company’s appeal to customers by charging low prices. People, especially young adults, prefer watching sports and as a result, they invest most of their time in viewing sports, which means that they cannot pay higher prices for internet platforms that provide sports videos. The causes of issues faced by the company include resources and market factors. Company resources include both physical and human resources. Human resources consist of brand names and intellectual capital, while physical resources include distribution networks and plants (Dyer et al., 2019). In this case, although Disney Company has advanced technologically, its “ESPN” brand name has caused customers leave the platform because of the increased charges. Regarding market factors, Alcacer et al. (2019) affirm that, ESPN has caused Walt Disney Company to experienced intense competition from its rivals. The company primarily deals with entertainment, which focuses on the tastes and preferences of consumers. The fierce competition has caused a reduction in the company’s revenue. Besides, the management of the company does not aim at the deliberate approaches of meeting consumer demands. Consequently, the company has been criticized whenever it releases new sports videos in the market. Walt Disney has not been able to attract new consumers and, therefore, it has been a challenge for the company to enhance an excellent market position by concentrating on the customer’s preferences and tastes. Walt Disney Company can address strategic issues by realizing the best action. For instance, analyzing the company’s value chain will help in achieving its operational goals and strategy. Although the company lost its ESPN platform, it can create synergies by customizing and combining resources with another company. For instance, if Disney acquires Pixar, the independency or resource combination will enable Disney Firm to increase its profits. Moreover, the company can change its operations to sustain quality and decrease prices. Lowering prices and sustaining the quality of services offered will help in maintaining the current consumers, and restore the customers lost by the company to its rivals. Furthermore, the company can focus on dealing with educative and motivational films, because customers do not criticize educative products and will remain attentive to educational films concerned with their social and business lives. Part 2 Should Disney Pursue the Acquisition of Pixar? Dyer et al. (2019) speculate that, companies perceive alliances and acquisitions as strategies that spur growth. However, alliances and acquisitions strategies have unique disadvantages and advantages. Companies that ignore the differences, risk in purchasing firms they should have allied, or allying enterprises they should have bought. For that reason, it is imperative for a company to acknowledge when to use the ally and acquire strategies. For instance, if a company desires to generate collaborations by integrating its efforts and another firm’s efforts, it should ally with the firm. However, if the said company seeks to combine production plants to acquire synergies, the company should purchase the firm to regulate economies of scale. .For example, Disney Company requires physical resources such as animation. Animation is essential to the corporate strategy of Disney Company, since the characters from Disney’s animated films increase company sales. In 2012, the aggregate revenue of Disney Company was composed of human and physical resources such as resorts, parks, internet, consumer products, studio entertainment, and media networks (Dyer et al., 2019). Therefore, revenue will increase highly if Disney acquires Pixar. Although Disney Company will experience a financial risk amounting to $7.4 billion, the amount is not small for the company. Also, the acquisition will result in overlapping and overstaffing of businesses and sectors. For example, the businesses and sectors of Pixar Company are similar to those of Disney, which could cause a substantial reduction in profit and a rise in workforce cost. Consequently, the acquisition will be influenced by market factors. For example, it will cause an increase in competition, because of increased advancements of the techniques used by the companies rivals (Alcacer et al., 2019). As a result, the Company can acquire synergies by retaining significant employees and motivating them to be more productive. The company should focus on solving the stability problems of the acquired company by creating adequate space for employees’ improvement. Moreover, Disney Company should adjust salaries and awards adequately, and ensure that the leading technology and creativity talents remain locked in the combined syndicate. Also, the company should focus on avoiding unmerited expenditures caused by certain behaviors and overlapping of departments. The new company will generate innovative ideas and reduce its operational cost. Acquiring the Pixar Company will increase Disney’s market power. Pixar Company has ten years of registered animation technology, which cannot be purchased by other companies. Furthermore, the total box of Pixar doubles that of Disney, indicating that acquisition will enable Disney to have a stronger market power (Alcacer et al., 2019). Furthermore, the quality standard, creativity, and 3-D technology of Pixar Company will enable Disney to increase its diversification and reduce its operational costs. The acquisition will help the two companies to establish mutual goals through excellent communication by retaining the creativity and unique features of the acquired company. References Alcacer, J., Collis, D., & Furey, M. (2019). The Walt Disney Company And Pixar Inc.: To Acquire of Not to Acquire. Harvard Business School. Dyer, J., Kale, P., & Singh, H. (2019). When to Ally and When to Acquire. Harvard Business Review.

The Walt Disney Company and Pixar, Inc.: To Acquire or Not to Acquire Student’s Name Institutional Affiliation The Walt Disney Company and Pixar, Inc.: To Acquire or Not to Acquire Part 1 Walt Disney Company has experienced various strategic issues. One of the issues is that the company has lost a significant percentage of itsRead more about We can work on The Walt Disney Company and Pixar, Inc.: To Acquire or Not to Acquire Student’s Name Institutional Affiliation The Walt Disney Company and Pixar, Inc.: To Acquire or Not to Acquire Part 1 Walt Disney Company has experienced various strategic issues. One of the issues is that the company has lost a significant percentage of its subscribers in the “Entertainment and Sports Programming Network (ESPN).” Currently, the company’s ESPN has few consumers compared to previous years. The primary reason why consumers have shifted from ESPN is the emergence of less expensive internet platforms (Alcacer et al., 2019). Before, customers watched sports with Disney, but currently, they can watch video sports using cheaper internet platforms. Over the years, the market position of Walt Disney had been high. The high market position was obtained through the company’s appeal to customers by charging low prices. People, especially young adults, prefer watching sports and as a result, they invest most of their time in viewing sports, which means that they cannot pay higher prices for internet platforms that provide sports videos. The causes of issues faced by the company include resources and market factors. Company resources include both physical and human resources. Human resources consist of brand names and intellectual capital, while physical resources include distribution networks and plants (Dyer et al., 2019). In this case, although Disney Company has advanced technologically, its “ESPN” brand name has caused customers leave the platform because of the increased charges. Regarding market factors, Alcacer et al. (2019) affirm that, ESPN has caused Walt Disney Company to experienced intense competition from its rivals. The company primarily deals with entertainment, which focuses on the tastes and preferences of consumers. The fierce competition has caused a reduction in the company’s revenue. Besides, the management of the company does not aim at the deliberate approaches of meeting consumer demands. Consequently, the company has been criticized whenever it releases new sports videos in the market. Walt Disney has not been able to attract new consumers and, therefore, it has been a challenge for the company to enhance an excellent market position by concentrating on the customer’s preferences and tastes. Walt Disney Company can address strategic issues by realizing the best action. For instance, analyzing the company’s value chain will help in achieving its operational goals and strategy. Although the company lost its ESPN platform, it can create synergies by customizing and combining resources with another company. For instance, if Disney acquires Pixar, the independency or resource combination will enable Disney Firm to increase its profits. Moreover, the company can change its operations to sustain quality and decrease prices. Lowering prices and sustaining the quality of services offered will help in maintaining the current consumers, and restore the customers lost by the company to its rivals. Furthermore, the company can focus on dealing with educative and motivational films, because customers do not criticize educative products and will remain attentive to educational films concerned with their social and business lives. Part 2 Should Disney Pursue the Acquisition of Pixar? Dyer et al. (2019) speculate that, companies perceive alliances and acquisitions as strategies that spur growth. However, alliances and acquisitions strategies have unique disadvantages and advantages. Companies that ignore the differences, risk in purchasing firms they should have allied, or allying enterprises they should have bought. For that reason, it is imperative for a company to acknowledge when to use the ally and acquire strategies. For instance, if a company desires to generate collaborations by integrating its efforts and another firm’s efforts, it should ally with the firm. However, if the said company seeks to combine production plants to acquire synergies, the company should purchase the firm to regulate economies of scale. .For example, Disney Company requires physical resources such as animation. Animation is essential to the corporate strategy of Disney Company, since the characters from Disney’s animated films increase company sales. In 2012, the aggregate revenue of Disney Company was composed of human and physical resources such as resorts, parks, internet, consumer products, studio entertainment, and media networks (Dyer et al., 2019). Therefore, revenue will increase highly if Disney acquires Pixar. Although Disney Company will experience a financial risk amounting to $7.4 billion, the amount is not small for the company. Also, the acquisition will result in overlapping and overstaffing of businesses and sectors. For example, the businesses and sectors of Pixar Company are similar to those of Disney, which could cause a substantial reduction in profit and a rise in workforce cost. Consequently, the acquisition will be influenced by market factors. For example, it will cause an increase in competition, because of increased advancements of the techniques used by the companies rivals (Alcacer et al., 2019). As a result, the Company can acquire synergies by retaining significant employees and motivating them to be more productive. The company should focus on solving the stability problems of the acquired company by creating adequate space for employees’ improvement. Moreover, Disney Company should adjust salaries and awards adequately, and ensure that the leading technology and creativity talents remain locked in the combined syndicate. Also, the company should focus on avoiding unmerited expenditures caused by certain behaviors and overlapping of departments. The new company will generate innovative ideas and reduce its operational cost. Acquiring the Pixar Company will increase Disney’s market power. Pixar Company has ten years of registered animation technology, which cannot be purchased by other companies. Furthermore, the total box of Pixar doubles that of Disney, indicating that acquisition will enable Disney to have a stronger market power (Alcacer et al., 2019). Furthermore, the quality standard, creativity, and 3-D technology of Pixar Company will enable Disney to increase its diversification and reduce its operational costs. The acquisition will help the two companies to establish mutual goals through excellent communication by retaining the creativity and unique features of the acquired company. References Alcacer, J., Collis, D., & Furey, M. (2019). The Walt Disney Company And Pixar Inc.: To Acquire of Not to Acquire. Harvard Business School. Dyer, J., Kale, P., & Singh, H. (2019). When to Ally and When to Acquire. Harvard Business Review.[…]